Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs

2013-02-22 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/22/2013 1:48 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > No. Both situations are buggy and neither of them is acceptable in > testing. > > [There are situations where we do knowingly introduce > uninstallability to testing, but those are always short term and

Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs

2013-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:44:42AM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 2/22/2013 1:48 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > No. Both situations are buggy and neither of them is acceptable in > > testing. > > [There are situations where we do knowingly introduce > > uninstallability to testing, but those are

Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs

2013-02-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek writes: > I'm not sure how you've arrived at this conclusion. Have you overlooked > that the shlibs in the ntfs-3g package have been fixed by the maintainer > in unstable (as commented in bug #700677)? > It still doesn't comply with policy 8.1. But I think that's a policy > bug

Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs

2013-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:27:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > I'm not sure how you've arrived at this conclusion. Have you overlooked > > that the shlibs in the ntfs-3g package have been fixed by the maintainer > > in unstable (as commented in bug #700677)? > > It s