Processed: reassign 671364 to src:dma, retitle 671364 to dma package uses outdated (2 y/o) upstream dma version

2013-06-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 671364 src:dma 0.0.2010.06.17-6 Bug #671364 [tech-ctte] Please decide on dma maintenance Bug reassigned from package 'tech-ctte' to 'src:dma'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #671364 to the same values previously set Igno

Bug#671364: Please decide on dma maintenance

2013-06-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Peter, On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:00:17PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Based on the prior discussion in this bug, it looks like this is just a > > > case of an overwhelmed maintainer who hasn't had time to work on Debian. > Well, the truth is

Bug#671364: Please decide on dma maintenance

2013-06-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > In any case, I believe that someone willing to help maintain dma, should > just do the work and add himself as co-maintainer. We have had no signs > that Peter would be opposed to that. Absolutely not. "Co-maintainer" implies a re

Bug#671364: Please decide on dma maintenance

2013-06-24 Thread Simon Schubert
On 06/24/2013 12:00 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > my packaging work is available > at a Gitorious repository and, of course, it may be migrated to > collab-maint or something similar - unless the new maintainer desires to > start from scratch with the packaging of a newer version of dma based on > up

Bug#671364: Please decide on dma maintenance

2013-06-24 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:28:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Based on the prior discussion in this bug, it looks like this is just a > > case of an overwhelmed maintainer who hasn't had time to work on Debian. > > And who apparently fails

Bug#671364: Please decide on dma maintenance

2013-06-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Russ Allbery wrote: > Based on the prior discussion in this bug, it looks like this is just a > case of an overwhelmed maintainer who hasn't had time to work on Debian. And who apparently fails to acknowledge it. Peter recently packaged libwebsockets (as a response to an