On Thu, 07 Nov 2013, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [131106 23:41]:
> > I'm OK with voting on the entire slate of nominees who were willing to
> > serve, even if that means that some might be ranked below FD, but I
> > would accept nominees telling the CTTE to do otherwise
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:32:31AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [131106 23:41]:
> > I'm OK with voting on the entire slate of nominees who were willing to
> > serve, even if that means that some might be ranked below FD, but I
> > would accept nominees telling the
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [131106 23:41]:
> I'm OK with voting on the entire slate of nominees who were willing to
> serve, even if that means that some might be ranked below FD, but I
> would accept nominees telling the CTTE to do otherwise.
If we vote only on those who are proposed here
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Picking a new member - process"):
> > If the way each member voted were obscured, I wouldn't have a problem
> > with a public vote. However, since actually obscuring votes is difficult
> > when there are so few voters, I'm not sur
Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Picking a new member - process"):
> If the way each member voted were obscured, I wouldn't have a problem
> with a public vote. However, since actually obscuring votes is difficult
> when there are so few voters, I'm not sure how that would be handled.
Constitution 6.3(4
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So we should hold a public vote.
>
> On the other hand I see no reason to list on the ballot candidates
> that no existing TC member feels we should be voting on. Doing so
> makes the slight to those candidates more formal and obvious.
If the way each me
* Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) [131106 12:51]:
> Nonetheless, that's not relevant here. There are several likely candidates
> in existence, so the choice will not be to use something existing versus
> implementing from scratch; the choice will be between existing projects,
> and given that, t
NOTE this is to the public list.
So, I think the picking a new member conversation seems to be mostly
done, and I think further relevant information isn't likely to be
forthcoming.
It's not clear whether we have consensus, but in any case rather than
try to come up with a consensus on a single na
On Wed, November 6, 2013 09:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" writes:
>> On Wed, November 6, 2013 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> We'll want to look at both sides of that question, and try to
>>> understand how much work like that is potentially on the horizon with
>>> the various choic
"Thijs Kinkhorst" writes:
> On Wed, November 6, 2013 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> We'll want to look at both sides of that question, and try to
>> understand how much work like that is potentially on the horizon with
>> the various choices.
> Do you? In the past Debian has not shied away from m
10 matches
Mail list logo
