On 01/19/2014 08:15 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
How mature a system is and how well-developed in Debian are relevant
factors
If we're making a competition of how long has an given init system been
in Debian, then for sure, OpenRC looses. However, on all the tests I
did, I see no major issue with
Keith Packard writes (Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion status):
I feel that having the Debian community endorse software where a CLA is
involved will tacitly encourage developers to enter into those
agreements so that their work can be published as widely as possible.
I can see the force
Nikolaus Rath writes (Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at
all):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Thomas, does OpenRC provide a means for do non-forking daemon
startup ?
[...]
Ian, quoting from your previous evaluation of upstart
Steve Langasek writes (Bug#727708: On diversity):
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:17:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I think (a) and (b) are pretty non-controversial. (c) and (d) are
required if we want to deal with new GNOME stuff and anything other
than systemd probably, and don't seem very
Steve Langasek writes (Bug#727708: Thoughts on Init System Debate):
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:41:32PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
...
I should point out that I have not extensively examined openrc, nor have
I taken into account planned features and development in either systemd
or upstart
Thomas Goirand writes (Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at
all):
On 01/19/2014 08:15 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
* The daemon does not double-fork; it runs in the foreground of
of its initial process.
Something like start-stop-daemon then? :)
Err, no, becase...
See
On 2014-01-19 23:18:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
As you say that planned features or development could sway your opinion: are
there particular features that you have in mind, here? For instance,
correcting upstart's socket-based activation interface is on the upstart
roadmap in the jessie
Enrico Zini writes (Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for Debian):
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 03:26:31PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
The main objections to some of the upstreams' behaviours are,
basically, they don't care what anyone else thinks, and are trying to
impose their will by
I think people should read this from Lennart about some basic insights of
what to look for in a Init system which has not been discussed in this
thread.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LennartPoetteringTheOneAndOnly/posts/ip8e1DqJdxT
Ian Jackson wrote:
Enrico Zini writes (Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for Debian):
I would imagine that among these four options, the middle two would be
far less polarising:
- we will use systemd, and way to go Lennart!
- we will use systemd, although we are concerned about
Hi Ian,
Le lundi, 20 janvier 2014, 11.34:35 Ian Jackson a écrit :
Don, seriously, if there is something I could go and implement or fix
in upstart that would convince you, that would be a lot easier and
more fun than arguing on the internet.
It might also demonstrate how easy it is to work
* Ian Jackson (ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [140120 12:27]:
Keith Packard writes (Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion status):
I feel that having the Debian community endorse software where a CLA is
involved will tacitly encourage developers to enter into those
agreements so that
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:23:39AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Keith Packard writes (Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion status):
I feel that having the Debian community endorse software where a CLA is
involved will tacitly encourage developers to enter into those
agreements so that their
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
I would prefer to see more neutral wording, something to the effect
of:
I didn't mean that the TC decision should mention the CLA. I don't think
that's an appropriate place for this kind of statement.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpUSSrYvh1Wi.pgp
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Nikolaus Rath writes (Bug#727708: The tech ctte isn't considering OpenRC at
all):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Thomas, does OpenRC provide a means for do non-forking daemon
startup ?
[...]
Ian, quoting from your
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2014-01-19 23:18:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
As you say that planned features or development could sway your opinion: are
there particular features that you have in mind, here? For instance,
correcting upstart's socket-based activation interface
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I think this is a good idea. I have written a draft paragraph about
the Canonical upstart CLA, in my most recent message to Keith.
At the risk of feeding the horrible energy beast I think I need to try
to propose some wording about these
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 07:09:51PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On 2014-01-19 23:18:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
As you say that planned features or development could sway your opinion:
are
there particular features that you have in mind, here?
18 matches
Mail list logo
