Users votes so far are;- (out of a pop. of~ 151,000)
systemd9473
upstart64
openrc5
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=systemd
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=upstart
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=openrc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Users votes so far are;- (out of a pop. of~ 151,000)
systemd9473
upstart64
openrc5
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=systemd
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=upstart
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=openrc
So what are the votes for sysvinit,
Nick Rhodes writes (Bug#727708: ):
So what are the votes for sysvinit, approx 130,000 ?
Please, STOP. These kind of messages aren't going to change anyone's
mind at this stage.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Colin Watson
The de facto interface for making an init system the default is to
install it as /sbin/init. While I'm coming at this from a starting
point different from Cameron's above - I haven't yet decided whether I
]] Colin Watson
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Colin Watson
The de facto interface for making an init system the default is to
install it as /sbin/init. While I'm coming at this from a starting
point different from Cameron's above - I haven't
On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 16:53 +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 12:57:39PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
You mean, like installing the systemd-sysv package?
Indeed; but people earlier in this thread have said that this isn't the
preferred approach, so I was arguing that this
On Sat, 01 Feb 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
Where would this ballot option rank vis-à-vis FD, for those TC members
who are opposed to the loose coupling option?
I'm planning on ranking everything above FD. However, I would rank this
particular option at the same level as L.
== dependencies
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Michael Gilbert writes:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
So all deferring for another cycle does is leave Debian with annoying
cumbersome init scripts and unsolvable race
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:00 PM, ChaosEsque Team
chaosesquet...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ah, you're a systemd acolyte. You smugly proclaim that it is USELESS to
resist!
No wrong.There are just possible ways to resist. Then there are
impossible ways.
Forking every package that depends on
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM, ChaosEsque Team
chaosesquet...@yahoo.com wrote:
Honestly. I, and many many many others, do NOT WANT SYSTEMD.
We do not want to be forced or cajoled into using it.
NOR do we want to be PUNISHED for not using it.
heheh yea you don't have to use it, but nothing
10 matches
Mail list logo