On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:00:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > My understanding is that the point of virtual packages is so that
> > several *can* provide it. But you're now telling 1 package that it
> > can't do that, while you instead could say only one (other) packa
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140322 01:39]:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:38:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > In general I worry that your interpretation of resolution texts
> > focuses far too much on the exact words used, and far too little on
> > the substance of the underlying issues.
> >
2 matches
Mail list logo
