Bug#769972: New CTTE members

2014-11-18 Thread Andreas Barth
* Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org) [141118 02:39]: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > Works for me. I like the "start considering" wording, too, as opposed > > to "closing the call for nominations". Good thought. very nice indeed. > OK. I've written the draft of this here: > > http://

Bug#769972: New CTTE members

2014-11-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Don Armstrong writes ("Bug#769972: New CTTE members"): > Feel free to make any changes. I'll send out the announcement in 24 > hours unless someone objects. This is (all) a good idea. Please do go ahead. Thanks, Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-18 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > The policy shouldn't make it possible for a CTTE member to file a > proposal. > Or, if that does happen, it should force that member(s) to recluse themselves from voting on it. -- -- Matthias Urlichs signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [CTTE #746578] libpam-systemd to switch alternate dependency ordering

2014-11-18 Thread Noel Torres
On Tuesday, 18 de November de 2014 15:01:42 Matthias Urlichs escribió: > Hi, > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > > The policy shouldn't make it possible for a CTTE member to file a > > proposal. > > Or, if that does happen, it should force that member(s) to recluse > themselves from voting on it. F