Re: Dispute resolution in Debian

2020-07-29 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Sean, On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:10 PM Sean Whitton wrote: > > So what you are proposing would correspond to the last of our > proposals -- try to remove the meditation role the TC presently has? I am sorry you read my proposal as curtailing TC's "territory". I merely meant to write that media

Re: Dispute resolution in Debian

2020-07-29 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Wed 29 Jul 2020 at 03:26AM -07, Felix Lechner wrote: > As a computer project, Debian's highest decision making body should > probably be a Technical Committee. Current committee members who like > to adjudicate more along human lines, under my proposal, may wish to > join the Community

Re: CTTE requesting questions for DebConf20 BoF

2020-07-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Marga, On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:58:51PM +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > which of the three options does the tech-ctte (roughly) prefer? > This is a great question and I hope we'll find the answer to this during the > BoF. :)) > > > Allow design work > > > - > > > **Pr

Re: Dispute resolution in Debian

2020-07-29 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Felix Lechner dijo [Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:26:00AM -0700]: > > Do you think it shouldn't have those other roles, maybe? That would > > correspond to the last of our proposals, I think. > > As a computer project, Debian's highest decision making body should > probably be a Technical Committee. Cu

Re: Dispute resolution in Debian

2020-07-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi folks, On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 07:01:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >On Sun 26 Jul 2020 at 07:59PM -07, Felix Lechner wrote: >> >> Like any court, the Community Team and Technical Committee should be >> able provide independent solutions of their own design. Ideally, the >> judges at the lower

Re: Dispute resolution in Debian

2020-07-29 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Sean, I hoped respected members like Sam would send additional ideas first, but then did not wish to keep you waiting. On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 7:01 PM Sean Whitton wrote: > > Do you think it shouldn't have those other roles, maybe? That would > correspond to the last of our proposals, I thin