Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 09:39:40PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Helmut Grohne [220131 17:09]:
> > > #966468 & #982944 asked for rename.ul to return (though the latter rather
> > > confuses the removal vs alternatives issue)
> >
> > I think it is relatively uncontroversial to re
Hello Helmut,
Thank you for the very detailed research (which I have removed
in my reply below).
* Helmut Grohne [220131 17:09]:
> > #966468 & #982944 asked for rename.ul to return (though the latter rather
> > confuses the removal vs alternatives issue)
>
> I think it is relatively uncontrover
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:11:19AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> The two renames have substantially different CLI syntax, making them
> unsuitable for an alternatives arrangement
I think that much of the discussion has taken this point for granted,
but it is one of the aspects that the submi
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 at 10:11:19 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> There are two "rename" programs, one part of upstream util-linux "rename.ul"
> and one provided by the rename package "rename.pl"[0]
Almost!
The one in src:rename is installed as file-rename(1p), aka prename(1p)
via a symlink (you not
Hi,
Having joined the committee, I thought it best to try and get up to
speed on this issue. Is my summary correct?
--begin
There are two "rename" programs, one part of upstream util-linux
"rename.ul" and one provided by the rename package "rename.pl"[0]
For a long time, Debian's "/usr/bin
===BEGIN
A: Christoph Berg
B: Helmut Grohne
C: Elana Hashman
D: Simon McVittie
E: Niko Tyni
F: Matthew Vernon
G: Sean Whitton
H: Gunnar Wolf
===END
G > A = C = D = E = H > B = F
[rationale: being new I don't really have much of an opinion, other than
the new chair probably shouldn'
6 matches
Mail list logo
