Hello Chris,
On Mon 28 Mar 2022 at 10:35PM +02, Christoph Berg wrote:
> The problem here is that if ul-extra contains things besides rename,
> and it conflicts with the perl rename, people will rightfully complain
> that they can't install /usr/bin/fincore-from-ul-extra and
>
Hello Lucas,
Many thanks for providing this summary of your position. Let me just
note a point of disagreement:
On Tue 15 Mar 2022 at 10:06PM +01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> A point that I find important is the following: as a project, I think
> that we care about facilitating the review of
On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 18:04:14 + Luca Boccassi
wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 11:32 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Luca Boccassi dijo [Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:28:12PM +]:
> > > I am part of that group, and that is definitely _not_ why I
wouldn't
> > > touch dpkg with a barge pole as things
Re: Chris Hofstaedtler
> > * which binary package should contain the util-linux rename?
> >- bsdextrautils
> >- something else
>
> util-linux-extra. Unrelatedly, other non-essential binaries from
> util-linux should also move into this package, but this is only
> tangentially related.
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:58:11PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I would like to ask a question: under which constitution point will
> the CTTE act?
Given your reply, I believe that no 6.1.1-4 decision is necessary. The
views of the submitter seem sufficiently covered in what you
Hi Helmut,
* Helmut Grohne [220208 21:23]:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:04:34PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > I was hoping we could put util-linux' rename into the
> > "bsdextrautils" binary package, which has utilities like write, col,
> > etc; to avoid putting it into an
6 matches
Mail list logo
