On 2023-09-01 Ansgar wrote:
> Hi,
> a practical thing with usrmerge and legacy layout[1] is the following:
> assume you do not want programs to find a specific program via PATH
> lookup or even a fully-qualified path.
> Then a user can just divert that single program away (or just remove
> it, de
On 2022-09-27 Zack Weinberg wrote:
[...]
> What I am asking for is a schedule change: specifically, that the
> merged /usr transition not be allowed to proceed past the status quo
> as of two weeks ago (i.e. *before* init-system-helpers added a
> dependency on usrmerge|usr-is-merged) until after t
On 2020-11-21 Stephan Lachnit wrote:
[...]
> Because the library was designed for embedded use cases where every
> little bit of performance matters, the runtime patch was refused
> upstream. Dropping the runtime patch from Debian actually isn't
> problem, no reverse dependency of libinih uses com
On 2014-01-19 Andreas Barth wrote:
[...]
> On the linux ports, all would work. On the kbsd ports I believe that both
> upstart and openrc could be working, but none is yet. For hurd, at least
> openrc could and probably also upstart.
>
> Porting systemd to kbsd or hurd is not realistic from what
4 matches
Mail list logo
