On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:36:21AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> FWIW, I think the TC should punt this bug to a GR.
>
> The dpkg maintainer has chosen not to engage with the TC in #994388, and
> now seems to be actively subverting a validly-made TC decision.
>
> I do believe it reasonable to as
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> * Because this is a violation of a Policy "must" directive, I consider
> the downgrade to be a tricky way to modify Debian Policy without
> following the usual Policy decision-making procedure.
Please also note that https://release.de
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 06:48:45PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> gpsd
netbase | systemd-sysv
> mandos
systemd-sysv | lsb-base (>= 3.0-6)
> micro-httpd
openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver | micro-inetd | netcat-traditional |
systemd-sysv
> munin
cron | cron-daemon | systemd-sysv
--
WBR, wRA
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:36:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> One question I have is about this: "several packages now require just
> systemd-sysv". Can someone refer to some examples, please ?
Third random try from `reverse-depends systemd-sysv` yielded lava-server.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.as
4 matches
Mail list logo
