On 02/14/2014 01:52 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
I am not so sure it's there. The current version runs without systemd
but doesn't support everything
Based on what? There is only one new interface in logind between v204 and
v208, an
On 02/14/2014 12:14 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:59:34PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-02-14 15:46:18 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Bug#727708: init system coupling etc."):
Don't you mean "drop GNOME, KDE and others"? It's not only GNOME that
On 02/14/2014 09:58 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
Hi guys,
So in light of the new announcement[1] how much of L vs T is still
relevant?
Upstart is obviously going to be pretty much dead in the water now given
this - after who is going to seriously contribute to a deprecated
project CLA or no?
It wo
On 01/04/2014 12:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Cory writes:
If Debian go's with systemd they need to use systemd 207 as its
supported in RHEL 7 so we know it's going to be supported for around 10
years also why does Debian have systemd 204 in it's repos?? systemd 207
is way bette
On 01/04/2014 11:21 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Commenting as a porter, the decision on default init system might affect
me something like this:
If GNU/Linux defaults to Upstart, it's likely in porters' interest to
get that working as well as possible so we can keep consistency with
Linux arch
On 12/30/2013 04:31 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
4. Conclusions
I previously argued that much of the benefit of a new init system comes
from when we can stop maintaining init scripts. I still believe that, but
after thinking more about the cul
6 matches
Mail list logo
