On 23/12/13 08:41, Adrien Clerc wrote:
> Le 23/12/2013 00:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
>>> It looks like both upstart and systemd don't provide direct
>>> mechanisms to
>>> manage all instances.
>> That's true (I'm only speaking about systemd). There have been
>> requests for
>> such f
On 22/12/13 21:03, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes:
>
>> This email is not so much about the change of init system but just about
>> the multiple-instance problem, regardless of which init we use. It is
>> not a huge hassle but it is something that could be
This email is not so much about the change of init system but just about
the multiple-instance problem, regardless of which init we use. It is
not a huge hassle but it is something that could be handled more smoothly.
Some packages provide a way to start multiple instances in one shot from
their
On 05/04/13 14:06, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Daniel Pocock writes ("SI units (was Re: failure to communicate)"):
>> It may actually be useful for the technical committee to review what is
>> on the wiki and make some general statement about Debian's position (if
>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/13 22:43, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting ian_br...@fastmail.net (ian_br...@fastmail.net):
>
>> If Debian bug report #684128 proves anything, it is that you will never
>> convince anyone with technical argument, facts advanced in support o
On 30/08/12 22:26, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 14:51:06, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> This is not a comment in support of or against Mumble, rather, it is
>> looking beyond Mumble
>>
>> A few weeks ago I put up a wiki page about alternativ
This is not a comment in support of or against Mumble, rather, it is
looking beyond Mumble
A few weeks ago I put up a wiki page about alternatives to mumble:
http://wiki.debian.org/AlternativesToMumble
and I've put up an ITP (sponsor needed) for SylkServer (supports SIP,
Jabber and IRC conf
7 matches
Mail list logo
