e setting /overrides/ the default behavior.
While I can't find the references immediately to hand, I distinctly
remember looking at various GNOME developer blogs and list posts
where they were stating that network-manager was not considered a
one-size-fits-all solution, and that it would
the intention!)
I also wonder, once the patch is in place, how aggressively we
could push adoption in unstable. With sufficient motivation and
aggressive NMUs, could we get this done for wheezy and release
with the autodetection removed? i.e. migrate the majority of
packages, and then h
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:27:40PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > At this point, we have one working and well tested solution.
>
> Which one are you referring to ?
I'm referring to using "make -qn" (with o
rther time lost waiting is not desirable.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your ma
ke any
> long-term solution to the problem easier.
I can certainly look into implementing this in addition. In the
meantime, has the committee reached a decision regarding the
original question posed? It's been several months now without
it being possible to take any action, in the absence of
nvert to debhelper and/or dh, which IMO would be well
worth it in the long run.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
`-GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
benefit to allowing this flexibility.
It should also be noted that tools like "dh" run
"make -Rrnpsf debian/rules" to determine which targets/rules are
present. i.e. they assume and require that debian/rules is a Makefile.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:20:31AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:25:37AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:18:53AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:41:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > &g
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fo
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Because unstable was changing between the rebuilds, some of the
> > failures are likely due to churn, including multiarch work, so a
> > failure
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> (7) Packages failing due to broken autodetection
I'm afraid the query wasn't entirely correct for this one. The
real list is this:
# SELECT o.package, o.version
FROM orig AS o
INNER JOIN auto AS a
ON o.package=
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:37:05PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roger Leigh , 2011-06-11, 12:19:
> >7) Failed autodetection
> > - autodetection failed to detect an existing build-arch target
> > - unconditional used build-arch
> > A complete list of packages is at the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] Steve Langasek
> > Summarised:
> > - auto
rch and fell back to build. However, unconditional still
succeeded here.
Hope this is useful. If you want any additional work doing, or any
further reanalysis or more detail about specific cases above, please
let me know. If you want to look at the data yourself, the data is
in CSV a
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:56:01AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Steve Langasek
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > | 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders
>
same hardware as last time, it'll take around 24-30
hours per complete rebuild, running 24 parallel builds.
I've attached the two patches.
Regards,
Roger
--
.''`. Roger Leigh
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
`. `' Printing on
Build-Depends-Arch/Build-Conflicts-Arch in sbuild is a
trivial change which could be done today.) This would be nice
because there's then a 1:1 correspondence between build, build-arch,
build-indep and the Build-Depends, Build-Depends-Arch and
Build-Depends-Indep fields, respectively (and the sa
des overridable (but I've not yet seen how to use
this, it may be just the API addition to libdevmapper at this point).
However, the default is still unchanged, and so I'll apply my patch as
originally proposed in the NMU.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2/2/06, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's nearly a month since the last mail to this bug. Is this getting
>> close to being resolved?
>
> Did you notice the content of the message before yours in th
Hi folks,
It's nearly a month since the last mail to this bug. Is this getting
close to being resolved?
Many thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debia
mple. The fact that there are other users of
the disk group and alternative ways of granting permissions are not
really relevent. The fact that it is an incompatibility with the rest
of the Debian system *is* relevant.
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:09:37PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:41:17PM +, Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 12:41:17PM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > Which procedure? You seem to know something I don't know. ("Overwrite"
>> > means in my context:
user exists solely for the
purpose of creating and restoring backups, and is equivalent to user
nobody but with disk and tape access. You could consider it
"equivalent to root", since it does have full system access, but it's
only ever used from e.g. /etc/cron.d.
Regards,
Roger
- --
ice other than /dev/mapper/control, the default
ownership and permissions come directly from the devmapper configure.
This is what needs fixing first. I would, however, like to see udev
become involved to allow this sort of customisation, but you will need
to work out the details with
When I filed bug #342455, it didn't get copied to the list due to my not
being subscribed, so I've forwarded it to you.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.
26 matches
Mail list logo
