Bug#1066034: tech-ctte: proposed constitution fix and social contract chg to make documentation accessible to all people

2024-03-11 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:37:45 +0100, debbug.tech-c...@sideload.33mail.com wrote: > The DSC shows “Version 1.2 ratified on October 1st, 2022.” But where > and how? The public should have transparent access to the > discussions, decisions, and changes. The last change of the DSC happened via a Gene

Re: Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing

2023-08-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:47:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 20:12, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I would very much prefer it if we can keep this conversation respectful, […] > > If you're frustrated, I understand that, but please can we take that > > off-list? > The perfect time

Bug#1007717: Updated draft resolution

2022-06-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:56:24 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Fri 17 Jun 2022 at 01:03AM +02, gregor herrmann wrote: > > And that's what we are talking about: Debian experts building > > packages for Debian. At least that's what my priorities are. > I think Ian migh

Bug#1007717: Updated draft resolution

2022-06-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:08:59 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Helmut Grohne writes ("Re: Bug#1007717: Updated draft resolution"): > > Simon looked at how other distributions approach patches and figured > > that basically everyone else uses the patches-unapplied model. > patches-unapplied is a good fit

Bug#1003653: Revision of removal of rename.ul from package util-linux

2022-04-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 09 Apr 2022 19:00:37 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Chris proposes to transition /usr/bin/rename from the perl API to the > util-linux API. [..] > Dom (or whoever maintains perl's rename now), would you agree to release > the /usr/bin/rename name to use it for util-linux' implementation > r

Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes?

2020-12-27 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 15:39:47 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Sun 27 Dec 2020 at 07:26PM +02, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > My reasoning is that init scripts are the end goal, and that elogind is > > just a symptom of that end goal, and that therefore talking about > > elogind in isolation serves no p

Bug#857257: Re: Supporting configuration file changes between versions in unstable/testing

2017-03-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:00:22 +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > The problem with upgrades is due to the change of location of the > defaults which were being read from under /usr/share/doc/ > > Not using /usr/share/doc/ in this way is a clear improvement. Indeed, if only because it would fix a policy

Bug#850887: To the right bug this time: Why do you want us to keep this open?

2017-01-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:02:13 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > as additional input, please have a look at [1] which just recently > popped up. There seem to be still unresolved issues with binutils on > mips*. We had quite a few regressions since the 2.28 snapshots were > uploaded and we still seem to

Re: Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2 (reopening)

2016-10-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:10:35 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The TC is clearly not too busy, just too lazy. I find your recent mails quite aggressive which makes them unpleasant to read for me. Please try to change your tone a bit. Cheers, gregor Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.

Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit support decision is not going to expire

2016-08-26 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:14:25 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit support > decision is not going to expire"): > > Ian, quick question for you because you might know the answer off the > > top of your head. Does running stretch with sysvin

Bug#830344: How should the TC help with a project roadmap?

2016-07-13 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:39:33 +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote: (cc'ing leader@, withstanding the temptation to cc -project in order not to hijack the TC specific bug) > Additionally, I suggested that a team (be it the TC or some other team) could > gather the list of goals and once a year let the

Bug#727708: init system other points, and conclusion

2013-12-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:05:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > By comparison, upstart is effectively used only by Ubuntu, [...] > Both of these statements are incorrect. > I'm sure that somewhere in the many vast threads that we've had over the > init system, someone pointed out to me that Google's

Bug#691098: unblock: mumble/1.2.3-349-g315b5f5-2.1 [pre-approval request]

2012-10-21 Thread gregor herrmann
opusthreshold option to =100 + (instead of =1) + - add #opusthreshold=100 comments to murmur.ini.system (shipped as + etc/mumble-server.ini) to match murmur.ini example +Closes: #675971. +This implements the TC decision in #682010. +[Thanks to Gregor Herr

Re: Bug#675971: patches for fixing RC bug, intent to upload NMU

2012-10-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:57:51 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Still, I'd appreciate a quick look by a CTTE member to check if this > implements their decision correctly, and especially a pre-approval of > the RT, since this is targetted at wheezy (please note that the > versions

Re: Bug#675971: patches for fixing RC bug, intent to upload NMU

2012-10-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:33:07 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > CCing the tech-ctte and release-team, as the intent is to coordinate with > both > for approval to upload this NMU. [..] > I contacted Gregor Hermann and with his help we created a minimal diff for a > new upload targeted for Wheezy, as