On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:02:46PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Would one more IRC meeting be useful to nail down the ballot options and
> their drafts?
> Our next scheduled meeting is the 27th of February, but we could have
> one on the 13th or earlier at the usual time if that worked for
> ever
Ian Jackson writes:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
>> In this case I suggest to decide just the question of the default init
>> system on Linux architectures first and address further details later if
>> no consensus can
Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Re: Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
> In this case I suggest to decide just the question of the default init
> system on Linux architectures first and address further details later if
> no consensus can be found elsewhere. Finding the c
Hi,
On 02/06/2014 06:33, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>> Would one more IRC meeting be useful to nail down the ballot options and
>> their drafts?
>
> I personally suspect that we have exhausted the capacity of the TC to deal
> with this problem, and that spending more time on it
Don Armstrong writes:
> Would one more IRC meeting be useful to nail down the ballot options and
> their drafts?
I personally suspect that we have exhausted the capacity of the TC to deal
with this problem, and that spending more time on it may actually result
in worse decisions than we would ma
Don Armstrong writes ("Additional CTTE Drafting Meeting useful?"):
> Would one more IRC meeting be useful to nail down the ballot options and
> their drafts?
I'd be happy to do that.
> If you believe a meeting would be useful, please respond, and delete all
> of the
Would one more IRC meeting be useful to nail down the ballot options and
their drafts?
Our next scheduled meeting is the 27th of February, but we could have
one on the 13th or earlier at the usual time if that worked for
everyone.
I can do the following dates:
February 7 2014 18:00:00 GMT
Februa
7 matches
Mail list logo
