Thank you for the discussion! I found it educational and motivating,
and hope that everyone found the same. It's really refreshing to see
this. Sorry for the naivety in my analysis and in the delay replying;
I've been drained/busy, but I read each of your emails carefully, wanted
to reply to
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 10:42:29PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:37:28PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>Le 03/12/2021 à 22:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> c) parse /target/etc/fstab, and attempt to mount other partitions
>>
>>The rescue system already
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:37:28PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>Le 03/12/2021 à 22:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
>>
>>
>> c) parse /target/etc/fstab, and attempt to mount other partitions
>
>The rescue system already offers to do it for separate /boot and /boot/efi,
>so why couldn't it
Le 03/12/2021 à 22:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
c) parse /target/etc/fstab, and attempt to mount other partitions
The rescue system already offers to do it for separate /boot and
/boot/efi, so why couldn't it do for separate /usr too ?
(Speaking only on my own behalf, not on behalf of the TC, here)
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 at 16:08:24 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> 1. Debian isn't yet ready for usrmerge
Merged /usr is not actually the problem here, although it exacerbates what
appears to be a pre-existing bug in the rescue
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:08:24PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags = confirmed
>
> CCing the release team, and CTTE because I don't know who else is
> tracking issues related to the usrmerge effort. I've consciously chosen
> not to pour gasoline on
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags = confirmed
CCing the release team, and CTTE because I don't know who else is
tracking issues related to the usrmerge effort. I've consciously chosen
not to pour gasoline on the flame war by CCing anyone else (nor will I
contact anyone else about the
7 matches
Mail list logo
