* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [120929 07:29]:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:30:23PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > You can actually check out the sources pretty easily using
> > > debcheckout, and as bzr is a distributed VCS, you don't really need a
> > > launchpad account to contribute
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:30:23PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > You can actually check out the sources pretty easily using
> > debcheckout, and as bzr is a distributed VCS, you don't really need a
> > launchpad account to contribute to it. But I think these sorts of
> > details should be worke
> You can actually check out the sources pretty easily using
> debcheckout, and as bzr is a distributed VCS, you don't really need a
> launchpad account to contribute to it. But I think these sorts of
> details should be worked out between Matthias and any potential
> co-maintainers he decides to a
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
> > C interpreter packages in Debian.
> > C
> > C 7. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
> > C additional co
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
> C interpreter packages in Debian.
> C
> C 7. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
> C additional co-maintainers to the python interpreter package.
I had m
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Bug#573745: Initial draft of resolution of the
> Python Maintainer question"):
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > If that is the case, I suggest to briefly mention that the
Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Bug#573745: Initial draft of resolution of the
Python Maintainer question"):
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > If that is the case, I suggest to briefly mention that the options
> > have been formed discussing "wi
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Just a comment on the above 3 options. Considering the fact that
> this conflict has been very long running now, I think it is
> important to be clear on how the tech-ctte has assembled the set of
> possible team options. I presume the above options
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:12:08PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I have prepared the draft as discussed; please find it below and in
> 57375_python_maintainer/dla_draft.txt in the git repository. If there
> are no changes, I would like to begin a call for votes in the next 48
> hours or so, with op
I have prepared the draft as discussed; please find it below and in
57375_python_maintainer/dla_draft.txt in the git repository. If there
are no changes, I would like to begin a call for votes in the next 48
hours or so, with options A, B and C as below, and F being further
discussion.
=== BEGIN D
10 matches
Mail list logo