Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights

2014-01-28 Thread Chris Knadle
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:45 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Chris Knadle > > > I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init > > system in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic > > administration interface in the middle of a Stable support period. >

Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights

2014-01-27 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Chris Knadle > I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init system > in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic administration > interface in the middle of a Stable support period. Probably the most > interesting scenarios with this involve servers r

Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights (was: Bug#727708: init system gr override - formal resolution proposal)

2014-01-27 Thread Chris Knadle
On Monday, January 27, 2014 18:52:45 Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Bdale Garbee writes: > > Ian Jackson writes: > >> I hereby propose the following resolution: > >> 1. The Technical Committee does not wish any resolutions it passes > >> > >> about the init system question(s) to stand in the fa

Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights (was: Bug#727708: init system gr override - formal resolution proposal)

2014-01-27 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Bdale Garbee writes: > Ian Jackson writes: > >> I hereby propose the following resolution: >> >> 1. The Technical Committee does not wish any resolutions it passes >> about the init system question(s) to stand in the face of any >> contrary view expressed by a majority of the Develope