I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
- Why are we loosing time to discuss the timeline of uploads, to see if
there was upstart support at some point
Thomas Goirand writes ("Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
> I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
> accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
> wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
This is backwards.
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
> the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
> merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting existing
> support without a comp
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
> > the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
&
2014-05-03 19:53 GMT+02:00 Ian Jackson :
> Thomas Goirand writes ("Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
>> I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
>> accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
>> wrote tha
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140504 01:03]:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
> > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
> > the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
> > merging reasonable contributions
On Sun, May 4, 2014 10:33, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140504 01:03]:
>> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> >
>> > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
>> > the multiple available init systems in Debian. T
7 matches
Mail list logo
