Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Svante Signell
One claim is changed, see below. On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Hello, > In summary: > a) Upgrades should _not_ change init: whatever is installed should be > kept. > b) New installs should get systemd-sysv as default init with a debconf > message about alternative ini

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 07:15:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > One claim is changed, see below. > > On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Hello, > > > In summary: > > a) Upgrades should _not_ change init: whatever is installed should be > > kept. > > b) New installs shou

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:14 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 07:15:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > One claim is changed, see below. > > > > On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > In summary: > > > a) Upgrades should _not_ change i

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
On 29-11-2014 19:40, Svante Signell wrote: [...] > This is another nail in the Universal OS coffin: Let's move to devuan, > please! Use Debian as upstream (as long as it lives) > > Yes, next Debian release is lendows, not jessie :( Thanks! We appreciate less noise on these lists and on the next

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > This is another nail in the Universal OS coffin: Let's move to devuan, > please! You are of course free to do that. This discussion is about what Debian should do, however. If you wish to discuss Devuan, please do so in a more appropriate

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:40 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > This is another nail in the Universal OS coffin: Let's move to devuan, > > please! > > You are of course free to do that. This discussion is about what Debian > should do, howev

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:14:07PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 07:15:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > One claim is changed, see below. > > On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > Hello, > > > In summary: > > > a) Upgrades should _not_ change in

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 21:27 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > But it does not seem like you are realizing what is > happening unfortunately. Debian will not be as it was historically due > to this issue. Maybe the new DDs are to young to learn from history? Please don't patronise people. Just because

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2014-11-29 21:30, Steve Langasek wrote: Debian releases when it's ready. If large numbers of our users are going to have a bad experience with jessie as a result of being switched to systemd, then we should take appropriate steps to address that, even if that means unfreezing the installer

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Svante Signell
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 22:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2014-11-29 21:30, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Debian releases when it's ready. If large numbers of our users are > > going to > > have a bad experience with jessie as a result of being switched to > > systemd, > > then we should take appr

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-11-29 22:25 GMT+01:00 Svante Signell : > On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 22:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On 2014-11-29 21:30, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > Debian releases when it's ready. If large numbers of our users are >> > going to >> > have a bad experience with jessie as a result of being switc

Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-30 Thread Philip Hands
Hi Steve, Steve Langasek writes: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:14:07PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 07:15:08PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: >> > One claim is changed, see below. > >> > On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:56 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: >> > > Hello, > >> > > In summ

Re: Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-30 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Philip Hands: > P.S. For those that think there's no choice when installing: > > https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd > > I'd suggest that anyone that knows enough to have an opinion about their > preferred init will be able to manage that simple extra step with ease.

Re: Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-12-01 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 08:14:07PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > That's even more unlikely than to add a debconf message (which would be > > package-owned). Yes, debian-installer is frozen. This would add new > > udebs, new strings, new