On 12-05-07 at 11:28pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable be
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because
> > > requests to rename axnode was met with ei
* Steve Langasek [2012-05-06 10:11 -0700]:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 10:50:21PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > If nodejs is installed later because an other package depends on it or
> > recommends it, this symlink would be overwritten by dpkg without any
> > prior notice.
>
> No; one package install
Greetings, dear Debian developer,
[replying via bugreport as I am not subscribed to tech-ctte@d.o]
On 12-05-06 at 10:22am, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because
> > requests to re
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:07:27AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> We have until now maintained Nodejs only in unstable because requests to
> rename axnode was met with either silence or refusal with the reasoning
> that axnode was more widely used in Debian than Nodejs.
> Obviously Nodejs is n
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 08:29:40AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> How about doing the following:
> node package replaced by a node-legacy package that contains no more
> than a README and a symlink node --> ax25-node, and depends on
> ax25-node
As mentioned by Carsten Hey on debian-ctte, we s
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 10:50:21PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Steve Langasek [2012-05-04 09:49 -0700]:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:38:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Raphael's approach of creating a compatibility symlink in postinst
> > > during upgrades but not for new installs sounds
* Steve Langasek [2012-05-04 09:49 -0700]:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:38:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Raphael's approach of creating a compatibility symlink in postinst
> > during upgrades but not for new installs sounds better to me the
> > more I think about it, since that addresses the
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:38:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael's approach of creating a compatibility symlink in postinst during
> upgrades but not for new installs sounds better to me the more I think
> about it, since that addresses the major concern of breaking someone's
> system during
The Fungi writes:
> I think this is part of the misunderstanding. If these systems are nodes
> on an AX.25 network, what's being renamed (and potentially broken) is
> the userspace binary which connects the machine to the network. Think of
> it as if you're suggesting a rename of /usr/sbin/sshd t
10 matches
Mail list logo
