Steve Langasek writes (Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft
resolution):
Voting no, for the record. In addition to the points raised regarding the
length of term, this resolution purports to be a decision in advance about
who will be elected chair at various future points, which I
Voting no, for the record. In addition to the points raised regarding the
length of term, this resolution purports to be a decision in advance about
who will be elected chair at various future points, which I don't believe is
constitutionally valid.
If a resolution were proposed that was a
On 2/22/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:07:22PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
If you believe that, then the whole thing is going to be far too much
hassle. We can't be having a faffy voting election thing every month
or two just to routinely elect the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:07:01PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
On 2/22/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:07:22PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
If you believe that, then the whole thing is going to be far too much
hassle. We can't be having a faffy
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:20:11PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
THE COMMITTEE AND ITS MEMBERS RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
3. The intent is that the Chairmanship should rotate through the
committee in the following order,
Ian Jackson[Feb / Aug]
Steve Langasek [Mar / Sep]
Anthony Towns writes (Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft
resolution):
Augh, we just agreed on a rotation, why a new one now? Downside to the
above: it schedules newbies and oldbies together rather than interspersing
them (Me then Andy; Bdale then Ian).
Your resolution doesn't deal
On 2/21/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Augh, we just agreed on a rotation, why a new one now? Downside to the
above: it schedules newbies and oldbies together rather than interspersing
them (Me then Andy; Bdale then Ian).
Because the dates on the original proposal were already
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:11:08PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Anthony Towns writes (Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft
resolution):
Augh, we just agreed on a rotation, why a new one now? Downside to the
above: it schedules newbies and oldbies together rather than interspersing
8 matches
Mail list logo
