Re: wider availability of pocket-devotee/devotee?

2016-11-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > > Debian often wants to have informal votes (team meeting dates for eg). > > I was thinking it would be useful to have pocket-devotee/devotee more > > widely available, perhaps by packaging them in the Debian archiv

Re: wider availability of pocket-devotee/devotee?

2016-11-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 03 Nov 2016, Paul Wise wrote: > Debian often wants to have informal votes (team meeting dates for eg). > I was thinking it would be useful to have pocket-devotee/devotee more > widely available, perhaps by packaging them in the Debian archive. > > I wonder about the correct approach here,

wider availability of pocket-devotee/devotee?

2016-11-02 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Debian often wants to have informal votes (team meeting dates for eg). I was thinking it would be useful to have pocket-devotee/devotee more widely available, perhaps by packaging them in the Debian archive. I wonder about the correct approach here, should pocket-devotee be merged back in