Hey, why ain't anyone bringing in dwm? Sure, no config is a bummer... But just
a few thousand lines of code sure makes it compile fast. Add dmenu and
powerline and it is pretty awesome!
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:09:04 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > Nah. Awesomewm is much better! ;-)
>
> Unfortunately no more. I still have awesome on hold on 3.4.15-1
> because 3.5.x is incompatible with the no more updated awesome-extra
> package. And without awesome-extra, awesome is far less awe
On 2016-02-05 06:45:49 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[M-F-T set, as this is getting increasingly off-topic]
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:16:55AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I mean, who needs a desktop? A background? Overlapping windows? We the
*real* tech-savvy people only need a tiling window manager
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:47:40 -0600, Gunnar Wolf said:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:45:49PM +0100]:
>> [M-F-T set, as this is getting increasingly off-topic]
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:16:55AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> > I mean, who needs a desktop? A background? Overla
Hi,
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst dijo [Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:45:49PM +0100]:
> > [M-F-T set, as this is getting increasingly off-topic]
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:16:55AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > I mean, who needs a desktop?
You mean a bloaty, shiny desktop environment?
Wouter Verhelst dijo [Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:45:49PM +0100]:
> [M-F-T set, as this is getting increasingly off-topic]
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:16:55AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I mean, who needs a desktop? A background? Overlapping windows? We the
> > *real* tech-savvy people only need
[M-F-T set, as this is getting increasingly off-topic]
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:16:55AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I mean, who needs a desktop? A background? Overlapping windows? We the
> *real* tech-savvy people only need a tiling window manager, such as
> i3:
Nah. Awesomewm is much better! ;
7 matches
Mail list logo