Package: gdb
Version: 4.15.1-1
If I run "gdb file", gdb says "no such file or directory". If I run
"gdb `pwd`/file", it works.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pixar Animation Studios
Thanx Bruce :-)
I am and I care. It took me years to learn to accept symbolic links.
Now that I am used to them and find them useful you want to take them
away from me?!
No, seriously, I reponded already to this and say; leave them alone.
They cost very little, simple for the human to resolve,
Hi,
Since the new packages are not being publicly available, I'm
only announcing this on debian-devel.
manoj
Date: 12 Dec 95 06:08 UT
Source: c2man
Binary: c2man
Version: 2.40-3
Description:
c2man: Graham Stoney's mechanized man page generator
Priority: Low
Changes:
*
Hi,
Since new packages are not publicly available, I'm only
announcing on debian-devel. I forgot to announce dist-3.60-1, so
this is the first announcement I am making, I am appending the
description field in the control file.
DESCRIPTION: Tools for developing, maintaining and distribu
Hi,
I just uploaded a new package, mailagent-3.44-1. First, a
blurb:
>>Randal L. Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RLS> Or, if you are a *real* power user, use mailagent. I found it
RLS> to be more feature-ized than procmail, and I had been using
RLS> procmail extensively.
RLS> B
Ian Jackson wrote:
> I was logged into chiark as ian. I have permission (according to
> .rhosts files) to log into myrddin as iwj10. root exists on myrddin;
> ijackson and nonexistent do not.
>
> The bug involving quoting the remote dpkg -l invocation appears to be
> a bizarre interaction between
> Package: gdb
> Version: 4.15.1-1
>
> If I run "gdb file", gdb says "no such file or directory". If I run
> "gdb `pwd`/file", it works.
It works for me. What libc5 are you using?
David
--
David EngelOptical Data Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1101 E
Package: cern-httpd
Version: 3.0-4
A user just complained that the httpd log files were empty. It looks like
the new logfiles were created, but httpd carried on writing to the old ones.
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up'
by a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package Ref Subject
Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1 bugs):
gpm 1669 shutdown hangs on gpm -k until mouse is moved
Erick Branderhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1 bugs):
xypi
On Mon, 11 Dec 1995, David H. Silber wrote:
> Package: tk40
> Version: 4.0p3-1
>
> This requires elf-x11r6lib, which does not exist. I installed xlib-3.1.2-2,
> which does not seem to provide what I need, but is the latest xlib available.
> I then forced the install of tk40 and found out that I a
ATTENTION shared library developers. If you have packages with shared
libraries in /lib, please read this.
> > I already have the patch and will be rebuilding libc5 shortly.
>
> Another thing I came across this hour during the build of netstd-1.25-1:
>
> gcc -o ypserv server.o yp_svc.o yp_xdr.o
I'm closing this bug report because there's no intent to address this
issue.
- Begin Included Message -
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 19:50:58 1995
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 19:50:30 -0800
From: Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diff 2,7, and lack of man
Package: netstd
Version: 1.22-1
While heavy NFS access is going on (for example, someone installing
Debian from my NFS-exported mirror), named serves a huge number of
requests which presumably come from nfsd. Should nfsd be performing such
a large number of lookups?
Steve Early
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where precisely is the Incoming directory these days?
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
---
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice,
>
> Package: auctex
> Version: 9.2y-7
>
> The postinst backgrounds itself. How can you tell if it succeeds or
> fails ?
The postinst steps through the tex directories and generates .el code
for auc-tex's use. This process can take a long time on slow
machines.
I decided to background it, and
"James A. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The postinst backgrounds itself. How can you tell if it succeeds or
> > fails ?
> [... (30 to 45 minutes on an old 486 w/ 8 megs RAM) ...]
> Perhaps I should have postinst ask whether or not the .el file should
> be generated? And have a script t
Package: sysvinit
Version: 2.57b-0
Package: mount
Version: 2.5-1
I'm not sure which package this reports belong to.
The new umount (from mount-2.5-1) does not have a '-n' option.
This option is used by some of the scripts from the sysvutils package.
If this is a sysvinit bug, it is fixed by the
Package: mount
Version: 2.5-1
The mount package does not install a /usr/doc/copyright/mount file or link.
Ray
--
POPULATION EXPLOSION Unique in human experience, an event which happened
yesterday but which everyone swears won't happen until tomorrow.
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.0.8
I tried the new dpkg but version number and dpkg-split aren't correct.
Transcript below.
Erick
~/new# dpkg --status dpkg
Package: dpkg
Essential: yes
Status: install ok installed
Priority: required
Section: base
Maintainer: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.
On Tue, 12 Dec 1995, brian (b.c.) white wrote:
> Where precisely is the Incoming directory these days?
>
ftp.debian.org:/debian/private/project/Incoming
--
Matthew S. Bailey
107 Emmons Hall
Central Michigan University
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Any resemblance between the abo
> Package: sysvinit
> Version: 2.57b-0
>
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.5-1
>
> I'm not sure which package this reports belong to.
>
> The new umount (from mount-2.5-1) does not have a '-n' option.
> This option is used by some of the scripts from the sysvutils package.
I believe the flag may indee
> I'm closing this bug report because there's no intent to address this
> issue.
>
[snip]
>
> Yes, if the manpages are generated automatically from the info files.
> Otherwise, sorry, it's probably too much of a pain to maintain it,
> though I might be willing to put in man pages but say they're no
A few days ago, all of the symlinks for the ms-dos file names
disappeared from the package directories.
Intentional?
--
...RickM...
> -umount -a -n
> +umount -a
This may be a "umount" bug. When you unmount the root filesystem, it is
actually the same as remounting it read-only because of special-case code
in the kernel. Umount will attempt to change /etc/mtab to match the un-mount
of root, and will fail because /etc/mtab is no
> I believe the flag may indeed be unnecessary; the source for umount indicates
> it will not attempt to update /etc/mtab when unmounting the root partition,
> regardless of its read/write status, because the partition ends up being
> remounted read-only by the kernel anyway.
That's a good feature
> I still don't see what's wrong with the FreeBSD manpages. They were written
> specifically for the GNU programs we're using, and they have been useful to me
> on a number of occasions.
If their copyright is acceptable, why not put them in the package? FSF
(really Richard Stallman) is attempting
Can someone point me at the cannonical source for RPM and its
documentation? [My net connection is a bit flakey at the moment.]
Thanks,
--
Raul
27 matches
Mail list logo
