Colin R. Telmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
Also, netplan only reads and writes to
LIB/netplan.dir the directory that netplan puts files into, and the only
directory that netplan will read from (see Network
Security).
where LIB under the vanilla
Greets,
I've finally managed to key in my '92 security paper on Shadow. You can
find it at
http://www.tab.com/~jfh/shadow-paper.html
As I get some time to go over how things have changed in the last 5
years I intend to update it.
My next Shadow-related project is cleaning up the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian White) wrote on 05.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I can understand Debian making policy that none of the core system will
depend on such packages, but I don't see any advantage to simply disallowing
such copyrights from the main distribution.
With respect to copyrights,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Pick) wrote on 01.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, very limiting. The code actually cannot be linked statically!
Can't be linked dynamically either... read the GPL.
Can too. Read the law.
The GPL _cannot_ restrict someone from doing that, regardless of what they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lees) wrote on 02.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 30 May 1997, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lees) wrote on 27.05.97 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are ways to avoid this. For example, modify dpkg not to include
any line with config=yes in it in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Pick) wrote on 02.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shouldn't have said 'dropping'. I don't think they are throwing any of
the old code out. But they are switching to Java as the primary language
which they are pushing. All of the NextStep API's will be 100% accessible
I've packaged `cgiwrap`, which makes it so ordinary users can safely
run CGI scripts. The scripts run SUID/SGID the user who owns the
script, and thus have full access to that persons files, and no
permissions on things that user normally doesn't have.
I am reading the policy manual right now;
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:
Can't be linked dynamically either... read the GPL.
Can too. Read the law.
The GPL _cannot_ restrict someone from doing that, regardless of what they
put in it.
Although they _can_ restrict you from
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Pick) wrote on 01.06.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, very limiting. The code actually cannot be linked statically!
Can't be linked dynamically either... read the GPL.
Can too. Read the law.
That is
Yes yes yes *Please* include this in the main distribution!!!
On Sat, 7 Jun 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
I've packaged `cgiwrap`, which makes it so ordinary users can safely
run CGI scripts. The scripts run SUID/SGID the user who owns the
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes yes yes *Please* include this in the main distribution!!!
On Sat, 7 Jun 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
I've packaged `cgiwrap`, which makes it so ordinary users can safely
run CGI scripts. The scripts run SUID/SGID the user who
11 matches
Mail list logo
