BTW, could you make a procps-dev package with a libproc.a, and libproc's .h
files in it? I need this for a package I would like to make called
w.bassman, it's a different version of 'w', that links with libproc, and
needs whattime.h to build.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
Martin -
I'm packaging a kernel driver for the Gravis Ultrasound sound card.
It requires some special device files to be created (in addition to
those normally used by the OSS driver) in order for all of its
features to work. My question is, how should I create the device
files?
The same issue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is libc5-altdev OK in its present state?
Hmm... OK for what? You said you needed David Engel's patch, you
didn't say why :-)
The effect of this patch on libc5-altdev will be to remove the
Conflicts: libc5-dev line from its package description. This is
part of the
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:06:02 PM
| Richard wrote about need libc5 non-maintainer upgrade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is libc5-altdev OK in its present state?
Hmm... OK for what? You said you needed David Engel's patch, you
didn't say why :-)
The effect of this patch on libc5-altdev
Pardon me for a nosy question. Does Debian have any money flowing in
from users that is used to compensate full-time Debian developers?
Debian does solicit donations to Bruce Peren's Software in the Public
Interest, Inc. non-profit to help defray costs (like Internic fees,
etc.).
Here's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'm not sure there is a problem with libc5-altdev. There
definitely is a dependency clash between libc5 and libc6, which
David Engel thinks we should patch by producing an upgrade for
libc5. This will have to be installed before hamm. It's not yet
clear to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like it but...
I like it too.
1) How about dwww? (Yes, I know dwww needs a web server...)
I think I'll add support for .dhelp files to dwww too.
2) I really dont like to have 2/3/... methods of building indexes
of documentation installed in the debian system.
Look for an updated dwww package and a new kaffe+kore package this week
Yuhuu!
Is it the version with the big step forward, you promised some time ago?
Unfortunately, not. It's more of a fix as many of the 40 bugs as possible
release. It'll be a little step
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
YEs, that is the whole point. I need to be have an account on master, and
added to the keyring, etc, for this all to work. I am going to keep working
on
This will be done, but everything needs some time.
compiling for libc6, and
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anybody already noted this here?
[ Cut - Posting about Yggdrasil packages - RPM/deb/slackware/yggdrasil from
common source ]
Looks interesting!
I wonder if they are proposing a new source packaging format - or if they
are building all the
Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Did you let the maintainer of the list (I think it was Phillipe Troin)
: know you were taking maintenance of this package? I guess leting
: debian-devel know is not enough.
: Why would I do that, when I took over directly from the former maintainer?
On 1 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need someone to do a non-maintainer upgrade of libc5-altdev, installing
the patch in David Engel's mail. I'm busy with boot floppies. Can someone
pretty please do this?
I have been talking with David about helping out here. I'll take a look at
his
The memory doesn't necessarily go away when you free or delete an object,
unless you are running Electric Fence. Thus, it's perfectly possible
that the program would work sometimes, with some libraries.
By the way, the security folks said they got your new maintainer application
four days ago and
Nobody's going to be upset if you create the new package. I think you should
go ahead.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
OK, I think the patch is only necessary for libc5 run-time.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
It's not _my_ corporation. It's got 4 people on the board.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
It looks as if Richard has taken care of libc5, and libc5-altdev doesn't
need a change. Dale, did you do the ae-using-slang upload? I'm going to
need that soon.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble?
On 2 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks as if Richard has taken care of libc5, and libc5-altdev doesn't
need a change. Dale, did you do the ae-using-slang upload? I'm going to
need that soon.
I've been out of town, and just got back this evening. I already have the
patches, (got them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott == Scott Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-
Scott /usr/lib/libc.a(connect.o): In function `__libc_connect':
Scott connect.o(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `__connect'
Scott /usr/lib/libpthread.a(wrapsyscall.o)(.text+0x3b0): first defined here
Scott
| On Friday, 2 January 98, at 12:15:19 AM
| Bruce wrote about My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!
--- pacman-10.orig/board.cc
+++ pacman-10/board.cc
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
oldtemp=oldlist;
while (oldtemp) { //delete elements in the now previous
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 8:55:02 PM
| Martin wrote about My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 02:46:11PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
YEs, that is the whole point. I need to be have an account on master, and
added to the
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I saw that bug report, to. Should the debian package still be name mdutils,
: but use the raidtools source? If not, how should the dependencies be set to
: make sure that someone upgrading will get raidtools, and have mdutils
: deselected.
See the
On Fri, Jan 02, 1998 at 04:25:09AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
dbview closes 14563
Please do not close this. The package needs some investigation
and will be libc6'ed by that time. If you have patches to it, please
send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok. I will try to isolate all the
'[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:'
Actually, I'm not sure there is a problem with libc5-altdev. There definitely
is a dependency clash between libc5 and libc6, which David Engel thinks we
should patch by producing an upgrade for libc5. This will have to be installed
before hamm. It's not yet clear to me
Pardon my ignorance, but why is there an gmp_2.0.2-3.deb in hamm's devel
directory when we have gmp2_2.0.2-4.deb in hamm/libs ?
Gregor
---
|Gregor Hoffleit Mathematisches Institut, Uni HD|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] INF 288, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany |
|
If I am running make on a multi-processor system I can use the -j
switch to allow multiple jobs to be spawned. Is there a similar
facility with dpkg-buildpackage or a way I can pass a '-j 4' option to
calls to debian/rules?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe
Hi!
[first of all sorry for the heavy crossposting]
[second of all please cc: your replies to me (either this address, or the
one at the bottom)]
I hereby announce the existence of Yate (Yet Another Text Editor).
It is in GPL and in embrionic state, still it makes a linuxdoc-sgml file
(and if
Package: ftp.debian.org
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but why is there an gmp_2.0.2-3.deb in hamm's devel
directory when we have gmp2_2.0.2-4.deb in hamm/libs ?
Probably because Guy missed removing it. I'm forwarding this as a bug
against ftp.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two options:
I merge the psmic into procps
I create a new package called psmisc.
procps is required. pure compatability would argue that
psmisc also be required (or something very close).
--
Raul
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:
Who maintains the tecra patch, and where can I find it?
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
I was wondering about that too -- because gdb has an older bfd in it
that doesn't support sparc-linux, but we've got a current sparc-linux
libbfd; if gdb could use the common package and shared lib, it would
save a lot of porting work. (Of course, I was hoping someone else
would do it -- trying
Ok. I will try to isolate all the patches that affect these programs. Some
bugs, however, should be merged(see majordomo), and I don't know if a
non-developer(yet!) can do it.
Everybody who has access to the bugtracking system can merge bugreports.
And as you only need to have mail access
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but why is there an gmp_2.0.2-3.deb in hamm's devel
directory when we have gmp2_2.0.2-4.deb in hamm/libs ?
As the maintainer, I have no idea. I uploaded both gmp2 and gmp2-dev and
they are both where they belong. gmp2 will
The menu package is amazingly flexible. :-)
(thanks!). (And, BTW, I agree with all that you said and I didn't
repeat).
wait=t or wait=nil - some programs exit after output, but I want
to read it first. (like how mc says push a key after it runs a cmd.)
This is a good idea, and can be
I made a list of packages that include shared libraries for which ldd
says statically linked. I plan to use this list to automatically
generate bug reports (about 50). However, I am unsure of the text
to use. This is my first try:
joost == joost witteveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
joost Uhm, there's a slight problem with ifeq($visable,
joost false,...). If we assign booleans to the string variables
joost ($visable etc are essentially strings), then I'd prefer
joost them to by default to have the 0 value.
Am 01.01.98 schrieb fog # perosa.alpcom.it ...
Moin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f I like it but...
Fine :).
f 1) How about dwww? (Yes, I know dwww needs a web server...)
On my notebook dwww is very slow when your're accessing documents. And
building the index produces a very high load on this system.
From the bug reprts on the xforms0.86 package, I've been able to
ascertain the following:
xforms0.86 currently depends on elf-x11r6, a virtual package that is
now obsolete.
xforms0.86 is libc5, and available in binary form only.
xforms0.88 is available, and is distributed compiled for libc6.
I've finally packaged up the shared and static versions of the otcl
libraries. Otcl allows embedded objects in tcl and is used by a
number of interesting applications. I've only compiled them against
libc5 but will upgrade them to libc6 soon, I hope. Testing is
encouraged. Take a look at:
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
[xforms0.86]
I think this more than warrants a non-maintainer upload..
Heh, it wouldn't be a non-maintainer upload. If xforms 0.88 is
packaged, it will become a new package named xforms0.88. Whoever
packages it will simply be the maintainer of that package.
Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Braakman) writes:
Ben Gertzfield wrote:
[xforms0.86]
I think this more than warrants a non-maintainer upload..
Heh, it wouldn't be a non-maintainer upload. If xforms 0.88 is
packaged, it will become a new package named xforms0.88. Whoever
packages it will
Scott == Scott Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scott As soon as someone packages xforms0.88, I'll rebuild both
Scott xmysql and xmysqladmin with it...
Well, I guess I'll do so, since nobody else is stepping forward to do
it.
Should I distribute the binary-only .tar.gz as the
42 matches
Mail list logo
