On Tue, Mar 31, 1998 at 02:20:29AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > I'm the maintainer of the file-rc package. File-rc is a replacement
> > > for the old /etc/rc?.d system. It manages the startup scripts in one
> > > single file /etc/runlevel.conf.
> > >
> > > This package contains a replaceme
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> if the signal occurs after the wait system call, but before the result of
> the system call is stored in "wait_or_timeout_retval", the fact, that
> the system call succeeded is lost.
> this is (1) a bug in apache and (2) a problem of me that i want to s
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Previously Brian Mays wrote:
> > There is an easy way to get this button on your screen, assuming that you
> > have the TCL/TK packages installed.
>
> I've done the same thing (using Motif), but added a confirmation check..
> I've found that when I m
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Someone wrote:
> > > 4 or 5? No, in fact there are only 2 vi clones in main: nvi and vim.
> > > ae and emacs in vi-mode certainly don't count. elvis, unlike nvi and vim
> > > is the only one with X support. We should continue to push for it to be
> > >
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I wish you good luck contacting the author. Neither the former
> elvis maintainer, Anders Something, nor me were able to contact
> him. We both sent mail to him but didn't get any response. This
> makes me very sad and angry about it. This is the r
Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >From the copyright:
>
> > >From the README on archive.cs.umbc.edu:
>
> > 1) GUS instruments were freely obtained from anonymous ftp site:
> > archive.epas.utoronto.ca/pub/pc/ultrasound/gravis/disk
>
> So they were extracted from the GUS
Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Make it harder! From now on no new upstream versions to frozen. Cleaning
> Incoming. 1. May is 'early beta' and 1. June is release time (to have some
> more time for arch maintainers and testers).
Please let's not delay it that long if we can prevent
Hi folks,
Twin, the cross-platform windows emulator and development libs,
has recently had version v3.1.5 released. I have been planning
on packing it up, but now that this release is finally out, I find
that I am absolutely swamped at my work! If anybody wants to pack it
up for Debian, please
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a
> > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there.
>
> Someone should tell them about GTK, now that version 1.0 has been released.
> A little bit of
i got bored so i replaced xteddy with the linux logo. voila! here
comes the new xpenguin. i still like my xteddy better, but if anybody
is interested, you can get xpenguin by anonymous ftp from
caliban.lbl.gov (you'll also find xteddy there).
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, b
I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to distinguish
between the two.
The main advantage would be that one could use tar.bz2 for deb
package
>
> I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
> the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
> teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to distinguish
> between the two.
>
> The main advantage would be that one could use tar.bz2
Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
> > the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
> > teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to distinguish
> > between the two.
> >
>
Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files
> > via the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one
> > could teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to
> > distinguish between the two.
> >
> > The m
At 14:16 +0200 1998-04-18, Brederlow wrote:
>I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
>the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
>teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to distinguish
>between the two.
Debian tar has a patch w
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 14:16 +0200 1998-04-18, Brederlow wrote:
> >I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
> >the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
> >teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to disti
Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on debian-policy):
> Hi...
>
> I had been talking to Guy on irc a coupla times, and he let me know he'd work
> on the bug. It's been a few days, and today I tried to check the current
> status but it seems www.debian.org is down. Checking another mirror revealed
>
Christophe Broult <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > BTW: tar can handle bz2 files. you can use --use-compress-program=bzip2.
>
> That option isn't working properly with bzip2 but hopefully bzip2 is
> now supported by tar ie
>
> tar cIf
> tar xIf
> ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Peter Tobias wrote:
> On Apr 16, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Summary: In a bo system, I managed to upgrade netstd without installing
> > libreadlineg2 first and the simple ftp client stopped working. This is a
> > really bad situation I really
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
I'm the tar maintainer for Debian, among other things.
: -z filter through gzip, bzip, bzip2 as appropriate
: That would be a nice thing.
But really hard to get right for compression. :-) For decompression, it is
conceivable that you could pick t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
:> Debian tar has a patch which hands off files to bzip2 if the -I option is
:> passed to it.
: Why wasn't the -z option expanded to recognize the bzip2 signature?
: That would seem to be a better solution to me.
Because the options are used both on comp
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files
> > > via the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one
> > > could teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I'm the tar maintainer for Debian, among other things.
>
> : -z filter through gzip, bzip, bzip2 as appropriate
>
> : That would be a nice thing.
>
> But really hard to get right for compression. :-)
Here are the author's description and copyright. I have questions
about each.
> This program converts text file between MS-DOS and **IX format. It
> works under System V, 4.3BSD, Ultrix, and MS-DOS/Turbo C. It detects
> binary files in a nearly foolproof way and leaves them alone unless you
> o
I am a new commer to the Debuan Linux. I use the shadow password file.
I installed qpopper 2.2 and couldn't get it work properly. I am
getting a 'password is incorrect' message. Can somebody help? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
What is the upload procedure for non-US? And what is the status
of non-US with regard to frozen etc; what distribution should I use
to get into non-us/slink?
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.a
The `gcc' texinfo, "(gcc.info)Nested Functions", refers to a paper
about trampolines, and references a server in Chili that no longer has
the paper.
I asked around a while ago about it, and got sent a copy of it in
`pdf' format. I would like it if someone could put it up in a stable
and permane
On Sun, Apr 19, 1998 at 02:15:57AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> What is the upload procedure for non-US? And what is the status
> of non-US with regard to frozen etc; what distribution should I use
> to get into non-us/slink?
Same as for non non-US, same .changes file, same distribution field.
O
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
> Here are the author's description and copyright. I have questions
> about each.
>
> > This program converts text file between MS-DOS and **IX format. It
> > works under System V, 4.3BSD, Ultrix, and MS-DOS/Turbo C. It detects
> > binary files in
At 15:30 +0200 1998-04-18, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> At 14:16 +0200 1998-04-18, Brederlow wrote:
>> >I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
>> >the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
>> >teach gzip
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The bzip2 tool is vastly less well deployed than gzip, so you'd be
> making it much harder for folks not running Debian boxes to play.
> You would also have to add bzip2 to the base/essential list in
> Debian, and it's not clear to me that having two compr
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> appropriate, though?
By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to use pristine
upstream source (since the vast majority of source stills comes in
.tar.gz form).
Having sa
On 13-Apr-98, 09:05 (CDT), Scott Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [re: bad symlinks for ldconfig]
>
> The messages are a symptom of not having the library and -dev package
> versions in sync. The solution is to either bring them into sync, or
> uninstall the -dev package. Either way will fix y
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > appropriate, though?
> By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to use pristine
> upstream source (since the vast majority of s
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> appropriate, though?
Not as the only format -- even the linux kernel is available in gzipped
tar.
I'm sorry, but the source format is needed in a far wider range of
contexts than the .d
Hi,
> i got bored so i replaced xteddy with the linux logo. voila! here
> comes the new xpenguin. i still like my xteddy better, but if anybody
> is interested, you can get xpenguin by anonymous ftp from
> caliban.lbl.gov (you'll also find xteddy there).
Why dont u make a debian PAckage out of it
Today, when installing some packages, I noticed some errors that
I didn't expect. Looking closer, my /etc/group file had been
damaged.
Looking closer, I found a couple of packages (msqld and sudo)
which updated /etc/group in what I would consider an insufficiently
paranoid fashion. While they co
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > appropriate, though?
>
I seem to remember that there was some legal problem with using bzip2
in the US - software patent, that sort of t
Daniel> I seem to remember that there was some legal problem with using
Daniel> bzip2 in the US - software patent, that sort of thing. Is this
Daniel> true is it just FUD?
IIRC that was the case for bzip compression. Bzip2 was rewritten to avoid it.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Santiago approached us (pgp-update) about splitting the debian-keyring
from doc-debian because a) the keyring tar ball is currently 256Kb
(36% of doc-debian's installed size) and growing (it may eventually
double in size when I get round to adding a debian-keyring.gpg) and b)
the keyring is up
Joel Klecker writes:
> However, I have run across a patch that adds an option that does use magic
> numbers to guess which compression program to use. The URL was posted on
> gnu.misc.discuss some months ago, but it is unfortunately not on dejanews.
For things like that, I have developped a uti
James Troup writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > appropriate, though?
>
> By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to use pristine
> upstream source (since the vast majority of source s
>Why dont u make a debian PAckage out of it? You can do one PAckage
>xteddy with an additonal command-line parameter to select the
>personality shown.
somebody else (Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) has already
expressed interest in packaging xteddy. i can share the pixmaps with
him though.
--a
43 matches
Mail list logo
