I have a very serious problem with the latest stuff in hamm, it seems the
dynamic linker has changed behavoir, an example:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../pkglib/.libs/ ldd ./apt-get
libpkg.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpkg.so.0 (0x4000c000)
libstdc++.so.2.8 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8 (0x400ce00
Previously Chris Fearnley wrote:
> But yesterday I upgraded a bo system to hamm which has a 3000 line
> /etc/passwd. Now adduser takes OVER ONE MINUTE to find a UID and GID
> for the new user. And my staff is complaining about the wasted time.
Are you sure it's a problem with perl? I've had the
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> I noticed that apt is not yet in hamm. In my opinion, this is the
> currently the single most important issue for hamm: unless we have
> a real good reason, we should be focussing our efforts around putting
> apt into hamm.
IMHO, the single most importan
Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 01:48:58AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
> > be included in the main
> > distribution area.
> >
> > I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
> > inclu
I noticed that apt is not yet in hamm. In my opinion, this is the
currently the single most important issue for hamm: unless we have
a real good reason, we should be focussing our efforts around putting
apt into hamm.
[Yeah, it's new software -- it's also the best way to keep the hamm
upgrade fro
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Meskes, Michael wrote:
> Please tell me what exactly you like more about mysql in comparison to
> PostgreSQL which really is DFSG free.
I find it much faster, it uses less resources... of course it has less
features too, but you dont always need subselects and transactions.
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "There's always one more bug"
> I got it. At least, I got one...
>
> Adam P. Harris writes:
> > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34.
> > Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out
> > with that ke
Hi,
Originally I thought that it was OK that bug #19085 which I submitted
about poor performance in perl was downgraded from "important" to
"normal" severity because it only affected one application that I
wrote.
But yesterday I upgraded a bo system to hamm which has a 3000 line
/etc/passwd. Now
Tomislav Vujec wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:16PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Problem is, you'll never be able to convince a DOS user of a text editor
> > with different modes. Sorry, I don't think a dumb newbie should be able to
> > install a workstation, but he should be able t
Please tell me what exactly you like more about mysql in comparison to
PostgreSQL which really is DFSG free.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 521
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 04:56:20PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
>
> : gd 1.3 is now DFSG free, and works around the patent issues too. I have
> : uploaded a non-maintainer release of gd to main, thus, webalizer can go in
> : main.
>
> Sounds reaso
"James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
> list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
> help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a
> list of *all* the bugs.
What about h
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 11:24:21PM -0400, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Where should I start?
>
> I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
> list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
> help cut down du
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
: gd 1.3 is now DFSG free, and works around the patent issues too. I have
: uploaded a non-maintainer release of gd to main, thus, webalizer can go in
: main.
Sounds reasonable. Though, in the copyright file of webalizer, the copyright
text of GD (1.2!)
At 17:47 -0700 1998-06-12, Richard Braakman wrote:
>Package: libc6-dev
>Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>[HELP] Dale Scheetz: "I have not had a chance to even read these
> reports yet. Some outside help determining what should, or
> shouldn't change would be helpful here."
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Where should I start?
I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a
list of *all* the bugs.
Yesterday, 12 Jun 1998, I uploaded dict-foldoc-19980612, which
included a new upstream version. After uploading it, I realized that
dpkg-buildpackage had treated it as a Debian specific package, so no
.orig.tar.gz or .diff was included in the upload.
I have removed this package from I
Bdale Garbee wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> : What will you record as fixing-version ?
> If we reorganize the server the way I've been discussing recently, this
> problem would go away... because no package could ever get into a stable
> tree without going through unstab
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> On 13 Jun 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> > Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 22978 Please move ircii from main to non-free
>
> This one can
On 13 Jun 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org (pseudo)
> Maintainer: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 22978 Please move ircii from main to non-free
This one can be closed. IrcII is now free.
Greg
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTEC
I just uploaded an NMU of ssh to non-us. It fixes a
nasty security bug where anyone could inject data
into an encrypted ssh stream. I suggest you upgrade
ASAP. The files can be found for now at
ftp://nonus.debian.org/pub/incoming/debian-non-US/
sorry, here is the test image. :-(((
andreas
test.raw.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
here is a test image. on my 2.1 kernel it works well :
total 2
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 45 Jun 13 12:23 TRANS.TBL
lr-xr-xr-x 1 root root3 Jun 13 12:22 bar -> foo
on a plain 2.0.33 it doesn't work well :
total 1
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 45 Jun 13 1998
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 01:48:58AM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
> be included in the main
> distribution area.
>
> I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
> included.
>
> Is it that you must purcha
On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> Is it that you must purchase it if you wish to develop commercial
> applications that require it?
And that you cannot sell it.
--
Madarasz Gergely [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's practically impossible to look at a
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 11:14:19PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> Many of us send a mail when going off-line for some time. This is
> however quite informal: these anouncements are posted once in -devel,
> once in -private; mainly there is no automated way of tracking them.
Please contact netgod
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 01:01:36PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'd like to offload some of the admin stuff for the bug system.
>
> I don't know how Guy (the other admin of the bug system) feels, but
> I'd like to reduce the amount of time I spend running the bug system.
As there were enough peopl
After carefully reading over the license of Mysql it seems like it could
be included in the main
distribution area.
I am wondering exactly what parts are preventing it from being
included.
Is it that you must purchase it if you wish to develop commercial
applications that require it?
Truefully
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > ... but there are times when you
> > just have to make a clean break. Going between libc versions was one
> > of those times, as was going from a.out to elf. Otherwise, what are
> > major number changes for?
>
> This is simply not true. When we moved
Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and it's an ugly method, and costs $99/seat. Netscape has
> native support for SSL. I'm trying to avoid clear passwords
> across the network. Eudora and qpopper support apop, but netscape
> doesn't... sheesh..
Well, there's the whole mozilla thing you c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: What will you record as fixing-version ?
If we reorganize the server the way I've been discussing recently, this
problem would go away... because no package could ever get into a stable
tree without going through unstable... one version stream should
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:24PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> And thus spake Tim Sailer, on Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:58:25PM -0400:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> > >
> > > Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
> > >
> > > No, but you
Tim Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, but I need to support netscape mail under Lose95...
There's a command line version of ssh that runs under win32
(I've used it under NT, I never run '95), that will do
port redirects (which would allow you to tunnel the pop
port).
--
Raul
--
To UNSU
And thus spake Tim Sailer, on Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:58:25PM -0400:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
> >
> > No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
>
> Yeah, but I need to support nets
On Sat, Jun 13, 1998 at 12:03:34AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'd like to receive some help. The program gets called with the
> following command
>
> /usr/bin/java JavaLex.Main $*
>
> The main problem is that there is no JavaLex.Main file. It is not
> included in the .tar.gz nor in the .d
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 08:21:34PM -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
>
> No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
Yeah, but I need to support netscape mail under Lose95...
Tim
--
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] / (home) [EMAIL PROTE
On 13 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now.
>
> OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and
> runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...
My machine has been running .34 for two days now, I have a proxy server at
work that has be
Tim> Does anyone know of a SSL-enabled pop3 server?
No, but you can run fetchmail within ssh 'tunnel'.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] According to the latest official figures,
http://rosebud.ml.org/~edd 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, Jun 12, 1998 at 09:53:16PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Problem is, you'll never be able to convince a DOS user of a text editor
> with different modes. Sorry, I don't think a dumb newbie should be able to
> install a workstation, but he should be able to install the base system and
> p
39 matches
Mail list logo
