[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter S Galbraith) wrote on 16.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - If you are using some docs often on a 486, you end up uncompressing them
>because it's too slow otherwise.
I'm using a 486. Uncompressing text is "too slow"? Ridiculous.
On the other hand, I currently have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manoj Srivastava) wrote on 16.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I disagree quite strongly. If the intent was to have
> uncompressed originals on the system we would have shipped them as
> such.
Indeed - the .debs would be smaller that way.
MfG Kai
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's not discouraged, it's simply not allowed or usable. New
> > maintainer don't accept PGP 5 keys; PGP 5 keys don't go in the
> > Debian keyring and dinstall doesn't accept them.
>
> I find it strange that you would make this mistake.
I've looked
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But
> >> nobody > goe
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the status of gnupg?
Not yet used in Debian.
> Is there a Debian package available?
Yes, on non-US.
--
James
David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> >Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> >> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
> >
--On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 1:57 pm -0500 "Stephen Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 07:54:35PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
>> When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I
get
>> this at the configure stage:
>>
>> [stuff deleted]
>>
>> Is this a bug
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> >Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
> >> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
> >
Michael Stone wrote:
> Simple because you didn't have to worry about xemacs. For other
> maintainers, they'd need e19, e20, xe19, and xe20. That would take what,
> about 100M? Not so elegant.
*shrug* The lesstif maintainer needs more than that just to compile
his package :-)
Supporting only a sp
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
>Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard.
>> I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6...
>2.x; we don't accept later stuff.
Really?
I rece
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 06:02:15AM -0400, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > >
> > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-infor
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary version
> and tell me if it works for you?
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
>
well, i just tried 1.3-30 and it seems to work so far.
--alex
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 07:54:35PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I get
> this at the configure stage:
>
> [stuff deleted]
>
> Is this a bug? If so, in which package? I've copied Che into this email
> anyway, since he seems to be
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But
>> nobody > goes around compiling the stuff from the other archs for
Quoting Ben Pfaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. With w3-el, I just set it up to
> build each flavor in a separate subdirectory; i.e.,
>
> mkdir e19; cd e19; ../configure --with-emacs=emacs19; make
> mkdir e20; cd e20; ../configure --with-emacs=emacs20; mak
When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I get
this at the configure stage:
configure:815: cc -o conftest -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
co
nftest.c -L/usr/lib -lgimpui -lgimp -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -lglib
-lXi -l
Xext -lX11 -lm 1>&5
/usr/lib/l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary
> version and tell me if it works for you?
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
Works for me. I was getting hangs
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there something like a graphical workspace viewer for Gnome?
Do you mean a file browser, or a pager? If the former, then there's
gmc.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Stephen Crowley wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
> >
> > : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> > : > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) writes:
> I am trying to remember the rationale we had for making Emacs' addon
> packages compile when they install themselves, and I can't remember
> it. Perhaps you can remind me.
The main reasons I recall were that we didn't want to have 4 (or more
later) differe
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 12:36:37PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Could you try the next prelimnary version?
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
Great! This seems to fix it, no problems here.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
pgpvX
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree that waiting for the large add-on packages to compile during
installation is very aggravating. At the same time, it puts a lot of
load on the maintainers to build so many byte-compiled versions.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. With w3-el
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
>
> : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> : > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
> : > longer login, nor can I su, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) writes:
> This morning I uploaded a version of w3-el that doesn't compile upon
> installation--instead, there are separate precompiled packages for
> Emacs 19 and Emacs 20, plus a shared documentation package. I see
> this as a better way to go than forcing the end-
Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But nobody
> > goes around compiling the stuff from the other archs for i386! So if
> > I suddenly do all my package development on Alpha, the Al
Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >
> > maybe a compromise would be to leave the packages in slink, make sure
> > the Description: field highlights their alpha status, and automatically
> > close all non-packaging bugs (and forward them up
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > It IS implied that its FULLY gnu-su compatible, if it is not then it
>
> Where did you find that? I never read it.
See control file, under provides.
>
> > should not provide su, very very simple..
>
> But then gnu-su is not yo
This morning I uploaded a version of w3-el that doesn't compile upon
installation--instead, there are separate precompiled packages for
Emacs 19 and Emacs 20, plus a shared documentation package. I see
this as a better way to go than forcing the end-user to have to sit
through a long compile (it c
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 09:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> *- Jeff Noxon wrote about "Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names.
> Re: what's after slink"
> | On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
> | > > On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuet
*- Jeff Noxon wrote about "Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re:
what's after slink"
| On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
| > > On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > > > john> I'd still like to use penguins.
| > > > Indeed,
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 11:20:28 +0200 (CEST), Remco van de Meent wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
> : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> : > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
> : > longer login, nor can I su, it jus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Ristuccia
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Unfortunately, this new security fix breaks the binary-only gigabit ethernet
>driver.
That's what stable kernel interfaces are for. Actually I don't recall
_any_ change in a stable kernel that broke any kernel-interface.
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:54:28AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Thomas Lakofski wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too
> > unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I
> > hope I can expect a
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
[snip]
>
> nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that
> the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has
> been exceeded.
>
Do you have PAM installed. I vaguely remember you can s
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Thomas Lakofski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too
> unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I
> hope I can expect a new unstable to appear within a few days, if only to
> drop those packages
Alex Romosan wrote:
> Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i just installed sysklogd 1.3-29.1 on one of my systems. i'll let you
> > know if i have any problems with it or not. thanks.
> >
>
> well, i can't send any mail out, and there is nothing logged to
> syslog. i can't su either.
Gregory S. Stark wrote:
> > You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb
>
> Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem.
Yes. That was the intention - which failed again.
The dmotif netscape packages seem to depend on lesstif, does this mean you can
run them with just lesstif? Or is that in addition to requiring real Motif
libraries? I'm surprised (but happily so) since i thought lesstif aimed only
at source-level compatibility not binary level.
greg
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed:
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb
Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem.
greg
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> >
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information
> > > usr/X11R6/lib/modules/xf86Jstk.so=20
> > >
> > > I have always gotten
Hi,
I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too
unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I
hope I can expect a new unstable to appear within a few days, if only to
drop those packages which were removed from frozen into it.
I guess a name
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Nuno Carvalho wrote:
> I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened
> when the power was down ! :((
>
> That's what appears:
>
> - cut here --
> Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
> /dev/hda2 contains a file system with
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
: On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
: > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
: > longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I
: > also cannot telnet to localhost. Someon
Hi,
I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened
when the power was down ! :((
That's what appears:
- cut here --
Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98)
/dev/hda2 contains a file system with errors, check failed
/dev/hda2: Unattached inode 70007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen)
|
| > - Another naming scheme without any background would be A, B, C...
| > There where programming languages doing this for only three
| > stages to get *very* popular...
|
| Nope. That wasn't the sequence that led to C. I won't swear to it, but I
| seem
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
> longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I
> also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got
> the exact same pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Tille) wrote on 08.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> see at the people near you and look at yourself with the eyes of
> an Hitchhiker)
Can't. (Can you guess that I don't much like the Hitchhiker stuff?)
> - Another naming scheme without any background would be A, B,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Gertzfield) wrote on 16.10.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Brent" == Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Brent> I'd like to chime in -- It's a real annoyance that the base
> Brent> disks don't set up lilo to let you boot into multiple
> Brent> oper
Nope, same problems, cant su, cant telnet in.
--
Stephen Crowley
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
pgpD1gxhbyDMg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i just installed sysklogd 1.3-29.1 on one of my systems. i'll let you
> know if i have any problems with it or not. thanks.
>
well, i can't send any mail out, and there is nothing logged to
syslog. i can't su either. looks like nothing changed.
--alex-
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you like to test a pre-release of -30? Again, on my server
> it runs as expected. This release contains a patch against the
> former version.
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.1_i386.deb
>
i just installed
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Stephen Crowley wrote:
>>Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
>longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I
>also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got
>the exact same problem. What is going on!?
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 10:30:16PM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> > rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running.
> Why not? I noticed today that it wasn't working...are there any fixes?
Its a bug in rvplayer
reopen 24893
thanks
Alex Romosan wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
>
> > sysklogd (1.3-29) unstable; urgency=low, closes=24893
> > .
> >* Re-Applied patch provided vom Topi Miettinen with regard to the people
> > from OpenBSD. This provides the additional '-a' argume
I have packaged up some gtk 1.0 / gtk 1.1 packages that include the
gtkstep patches. I am about to upload these to ftp://fx1.circlefx.com/debian/
in a little while. So anyone feel free to try them out / test them.
I have also packaged up cooledit 3.7.4.
Regards,
Are there any plans to package things like the nextish GTK patches or
anything like that? From freshmeat:
subject: GTKstep 1.1.2
added by: Ullrich Hafner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
time: 15:08
category: Software
GTKstep is a patch to improve the boring GTK+ look and feel with a
NEXTSTEP(tm) look a
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. We have zless to less gz'd files. Magicfilter will print them, as
> will a2ps (maybe some others will too, haven't tried it.) Netscape reads
> them, so does lynx. And of course man and info work with them. zgrep
> will grep them. vim reads them just
Zed Pobre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't agree here. Some programs have included example files
> that are either c files that (unless there's a trick I don't know
> about) will not compile compressed, or example data files that cannot
> be read by the program in question compressed. T
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> M-x toggle-auto-compression
> M-x auto-compression-mode
Just put
(auto-compression-mode 1)
in your .emacs.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running.
Thanks. That explains it. Hope it gets fixed soon one way or
another...
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
"W. Paul Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x4018)
Ah. You're using the older version, but other than newer versions, I
have all the relevant libs.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running.
Why not? I noticed today that it wasn't working...are there any fixes?
It'll suck when 2.2 comes out and rvplayer don't wrok...
> "Rob" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> I've installed the rvplayer package, but even something as
Rob> simple as
Rob> rvplayer /usr/doc/rvplayer/examples/welcome.rm
Rob> doesn't work. The app comes up, and then it just sits there.
Rob> Does this work
> "Michael" == Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I found more than GXedit. There is a nice task timer
Michael> available named gtimer. I might package that one
Michael> too. Also there is a GTK mp3 player named replay. It is
Michael> GPLed but based on amp.
> "Michael" == Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I read so much about a patch needed to get syntax
Michael> highlighting. Do we have that patch in out gtk libs? If
Michael> no, why not?
I'm not sure what you mean by "syntax highlighting" (isn't that what
Emacs do
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1)
> > that the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time
> > limit has been exceeded.
>
> Only on serial l
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that
> the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has
> been exceeded.
Only on serial lines or on telnet/ssh/console, too? Are u sure there are
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:49:54AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Quoting Tom Lees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want
> > a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use
> > GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:03:30AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem
> > also occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was
> > noticed.
>
> perhaps cpu seconds limit en
Works for me. Make sure you have all the libs you need.
Output of ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rvplayer/rvplayer
/lib/nfslock.so.0 => /lib/nfslock.so.0 (0x4000c000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXmu.so.6 (0x4000e000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXt.so.6 (0x400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
> sysklogd (1.3-29) unstable; urgency=low, closes=24893
> .
>* Re-Applied patch provided vom Topi Miettinen with regard to the people
> from OpenBSD. This provides the additional '-a' argument used for
> specifying additional UNIX domain
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:03:30AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem also
> occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was noticed.
perhaps cpu seconds limit enforced by ulimit?
See ulimit -a
Greetings
Bernd
--
(
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 12:21:06PM -0400, Mitch Blevins wrote:
> > FWIW - I have the same problem. No idled. No logoutd. No lines
> > in /etc/porttime. Still get booted off the console after several
> > hours.
>
> Perhaps it's your shell; tcsh has a
73 matches
Mail list logo
