On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 09:46:25AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: communicator (debian/contrib)
Maintainer: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
60193 communicator: buss error when replying to message
Communicator is a meta package. This bug should be reassigned to
the version of netscape
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
It might be he wants to talk about -changes ? There he's right (and I do
totally agree with him).
I'm not excited about a list per architecture, but I've often wondered if
only posting to the lists messages for uploads that include source might not
be
On Mar 17, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, David Starner wrote:
Honestly, I found the interface of ImageMagick to be too clumsy
to just view pictures. Until I grabbed xzgv out of Incoming,
xv was the least clumsy graphic viewer interface. The authors
of xzgv have produced an X
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 05:30:41PM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
Currently i've subscribed to devel-changes on another mail account which
only serves for sorting out the relevant (at least for me) parts. These
are sorted out using procmail (which is not
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 09:41:49PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
I see. Thanks. I tried unix/localhost:7100 and that doesn't work.
remove that 'localhost' and you are on!
Bye,
Matthias
--
+-created at Sun Mar 19 10:59:46 CET 2000-+
|Matthias Berse
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 07:05:23PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
Package: lsof (debian/main)
Maintainer: Jim Mintha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
57203 lsof does not build with 2.3 kernel headers [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Log
for failed build of lsof_4.48-1 (dist=frozen)]
Should this be release-critical?
hi,
i just realized that /etc/shadow are mode 644 (owned by root:root) on
two of my systems. (Another two machines are not affected, however)
i'm sure this change was not made manually, but have no clue what
could have caused it.
a grep in /var/lib/dpkg/info didn't show anything.
anyone got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
BugScan reporter writes:
Package: tetex-base (debian/main)
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
42698 tetex-base: The french option of babel is broken
Package: tetex-bin (debian/main)
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I intend to package abook (an ncurses address book program):
http://www.linuxstart.com/~jheinonen/abook/
License is GPL.
I have the package ready.
This package is being sponsored by Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Alan Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have packaged my selection of Perl/Tk network utils, from:
http://www.whirlnet.co.uk/linux/
All are under GPL.
I've had a package of these sitting around since June, waiting for
new-maintainer to re-open, but now I've become fed up of waiting and
this is being sponsored by Edward Betts
Solfege is an eartraining program for GNOME written in python.
(http://solfege.sourceforge.net)
I'm the author of the program and Olav Stetzer will be sponsoring me.
The package will be called solfege
Tom Cato Amundsen
Previously Jacob Kuntz wrote:
Robert Ramiega ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I must have missed it... Anyway it needs dpkg.h and i cant find it on my
system... Searcher on Debian Web site can't find it either =o((
it's in dpkg-dev.
It used to be, but I remove libdpkg and its header-files from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi there,
I have put some new version of tetex-* for potato in
ftp.uni-mainz.de/pub/Linux/debian-local for testing.
Please test them for the fixed bugs and let me know if there are
further issues.
from the changelogs:
tetex-bin (1.0.6-4) frozen unstable;
Previously Zed Pobre wrote:
It's a fairly common ruleset, I think. You can have mine.
That can be done a lot simpler:
:0:
* ^X-Mailing-List:.*debian-devel-changes
{
:0
* ^Subject:.*\((alpha|arm|powerpc|m68k|sparc)\)
/dev/null
:0
debian-devel-changes/
}
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
During the slink freeze there was some discussion of the wasted
bandwidth due to -devel-announce and -announce listing all packages
installed/uploaded to all architectures.
As I recall, the consensus was that, after
Hello Siggy,
It seems your are the new maintainer of hwtools. Good :-))
I sent few weeks ago a request to enhance hwtools for multiarch support
(#58060).
In fact, I'm willing to use the scsi stuff on my sparc too (especially scsiinfo
scsidev). I succedeed to using it with really minor
Ben Collins wrote:
As I recall, the consensus was that, after slink was released,
these lists would be split by architecture, and anyone interested in
more than one architecture could subscribe to as many lists as
required. I am sure that the overwhelming majority would subscribe to
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
During the slink freeze there was some discussion of the wasted
bandwidth due to -devel-announce and -announce listing all packages
installed/uploaded to all architectures.
close 60750
close 60753
thanks
On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
When using mutt in an xterm, the color bindings in /etc/Muttrc make it
very hard to read mail: 8 different colors on one screen, colored
Ben == Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben try running:
Ben dpkg-deb --extract man.deb /tmp/tmpdir
Ben If that fails too, then add strace -o dpkg-deb.out to the
Ben start of that line and send me the dpkg-deb.out file.
No errors:
lyell:~# dpkg-deb --extract
The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does what
someone would expect.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
When using mutt in an xterm, the color bindings in /etc/Muttrc make it
very hard to read mail: 8
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 07:53:35PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
The /etc/Muttrc in the mutt package makes a fruit salad of mutt.
Most people like it.
BTW, the default key bindings in mutt are horribly broken. No key does
what someone would expect.
that depends on what you're used to.
23 matches
Mail list logo
