Takuo KITAME wrote:
Description: A tty recorder
ttyrec is a tty recorder. A recorded data can be playback with the included
ttyplay command. ttyrec is just a derivative of script command for recording
timing information with microsecond accuracy as well.
Hmm, are you aware of bug #68556?
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:49:49 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Younie)
wrote:
Or add woody to sources.list and parse the Packages files locally.
Since we have a Debian mirror, I decided to locally parse the Packages
files on the mirror machine.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:17:28 GMT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Haber) wrote:
I am maintainer for run and console-log, and waiting for NM to
complete. Unfortunately, run has a nasty bug that causes console-log
to hang which in turn may prevent a clean shutdown. I don't have the
expertise to fix this one
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:43:08AM -0700, John Galt wrote:
RTFFYI. It refers to bandwidth
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Marc Haber wrote:
The four lines rule doesn't apply to bandwidth. It applies to screen
real estate.
no need to quarrel here, historically it applied to *both*.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 08:02:10PM -0600, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
On the more mundane side, it doesn't know how to deal with BO2K, and
upstream development appears to be halted (no mailing-list or CVS
updates updates in a year).
Yes. It's unmaintained.
More details on the 'Unmaintained Free
Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
I wouldn't mind doing it - i'm going to do kernel-patch-int, and openwall
fits in nicely..
Greets,
++ 27/12/00 12:21 +0100 - Martin Schulze:
Debian will have a booth in exhibition. Also we need to be
reprepresented on all conferences. We need volunteers! BTW, I hope to
see some non-russian debian developers on Moscow exhibition, because there
are
only two of us in .ru.
Are there
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:18:35PM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
Quoting Matt Zimmerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Has anyone looked into packaging the Openwall patches for the kernel? Their
licensing is kosher. If nobody else steps up, I'll probably do it.
I wouldn't mind doing it - i'm
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
On this box, there are...
$ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
dpkg
catdoc
cdcd
cflow
dvidvi
electric-fence
fakeroot
hfsutils
libgdbmg1-dev
liblockfile1
libmime-base64-perl
lsof-2.2
m4
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make to handle dependancies).
My point being, that yes I already use squid as a proxy server for a whole
network of
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
On this box, there are...
[...]
...several packages that install stuff in /usr/man . Do these warrant bug
reports?
Yep, IMHO. We should be FHS compliant
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I updated vim-perl from Debian unstable and got
the following error during installation with dselect:
[snip]
Should I file this as a bug, or could be something wrong with my Perl
installation?
Don't file
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:58:44PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
problem in the BTS...
Alright.
There are just two wrong linebreaks in the postinst script.
Ahh, this was indeed a simple problem.
Many thanks.
Guenter
--
Linux:
Previously Uwe Hermann wrote:
Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
problem in the BTS...
9 at the moment it seems.
There are just two wrong linebreaks in the postinst script.
Indeed, a stupid copypaste error I made. Should be fixed in 5.7.019-2
which is
Previously Chad Miller wrote:
I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
On this box, there are...
There are more problems, like packages usage /var/cache which shouldn't
exist anymore.
Wichert.
--
Previously Chad Miller wrote:
dpkg
Looking at the changelog the dpkg manpage were moved to /usr/share/man
in version 1.4.1.5, released Tue, 13 Jul 1999. I just checked and I
have dpkg manpage in /usr/share/man on my system.
Wichert.
--
Hi Guenter!
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
Should I file this as a bug, or could be something wrong with my Perl
installation?
This issue has been filed about 10 time (really!) and is resolved in -2
which is currently in incoming (yes, wiggy uploaded a new -2).
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Chad Miller wrote:
dpkg
Looking at the changelog the dpkg manpage were moved to /usr/share/man
in version 1.4.1.5, released Tue, 13 Jul 1999. I just checked and I
have dpkg manpage in /usr/share/man on my system.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:14:30PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Uwe Hermann wrote:
Don't file a bug. There's already _at least_ 5 or 6 bugs about this
problem in the BTS...
9 at the moment it seems.
Guess you'll have a lot of fun, closing/merging all those bugs :-)
Uwe.
--
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:05:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
Martin. Yes. I tried. Do you think I'm a newbie or something? Why
do you think the file is owned by root? It's on windows partition...
Hold on ... this is an msdos partition mounted? If so, check
I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
- chad
--
Chad Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://web.chad.org/ (GPG)
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
First corollary to Clarke's
Chad Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
Just do a
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
where sed do the right thing. That is an easy way, right? (say yes!)
On 28 Dec 2000, Brian May wrote:
Hamish == Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hamish On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:23:52PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
still haven't tried 2.2.18. The video= options seems to be
completely ignored, and Linux boots up as if it wasn't there.
Chad Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't suppose there's a easy way to submit a batch of bug reports, eh?
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:17:40PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Just do a
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
where
Chad Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:41:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
BUT gmc (and most possibly mc) will not be
able to rename stuff, though you can move
files ;) It's a bug for certain!
Whoa. I don't understand that; what's the difference between moving and
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:08:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
Branden On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:58:47PM +1100, Brian May
Branden wrote:
I seem to have problems booting Linux 2.2.18 via NFS root
image. **2.2.17 works fine**, but 2.2.18 says No NFS servers
available, giving
Hmm. sorry to step in here, but
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
My point being, that yes I already use squid as a proxy server for a whole
network of apt-geting debian boxes and after only a little work it works
this could also be replaced by NFS, or a small
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:41:03AM -0500, Damian M Gryski wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Edward Betts wrote:
Arto Jantunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to adopt abuse, if that's okay with you. I don't think I can
handle
the 'only 8bpp'-bug, thought. There is/was a project for
Is there a GRUB mailing list, or is this the proper forum for
GRUB questions?
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|_) (_) |_) 1294 S.W. Seagull Way [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palm City, FL USA GPG Key ID: 390D6559
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:58:09PM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Is there a GRUB mailing list, or is this the proper forum for
GRUB questions?
bug-grub@gnu.org
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp89c6oWkCJo.pgp
These files include such things as fvwm, koules and xbill.
There doesn't seem to be any tools specifically for building packages.
I know the source for all the packages is kept under the source
directory, but these files aren't in their subcategory directory.
eg we have
Anyway, what does apt-cache not do that you want to have happen?
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed
here.
[...]
Martin Schulze [EMAIL
Daniel Kobras wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Below is a listing of packages needing a new maintainer. I know that
all the information is in the WNPP already, but I thought it would
be a good idea to post a summary since the WNPP bugs were not CCed
here.
[...]
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Martin Schulze wrote:
Daniel Kobras wrote:
O: manpages-de -- German manpages
I'd be willing to take them, if it's just for the Debian maintainership
and fixing the few outstanding bugs. However, Joey, I see you are also
Please take over Debian maintainership.
hi
Peter Makholm schrieb:
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
You'd better use [EMAIL PROTECTED], else you need a very
good asbestos suit ...
ciao, 2ri
Hi
Hamish Moffatt schrieb:
Package X and package Y are not truely unrelated if they share any
dynamic libraries, though, eg libc.
So do you have any suggestion as to how this could actually be
implemented? Even if it's actually desirable (which I dispute),
implementation seems far from
* Michael Moerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20001219 01:30]:
I have tried to talk to Brian Bassett [EMAIL PROTECTED] directly
several times by email. The first email was sent at least 2 months
ago. The second was sent over than 1 month ago and since I have
sent the third about a week has passed by.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:56:37PM +0100, Arthur Korn wrote:
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
You'd better use [EMAIL PROTECTED], else you need a very
good asbestos suit ...
Too late. }:)
BTW your Mail-Followup-To is broken.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:08:08PM +, Chad Miller wrote:
I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
On this box, there are...
$ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
[...]
mpg123
Not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dpkg -l
On 00-12-28 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Kurz wrote:
|dpkg-scriptlib -- dpkg-perl and dpkg-python (142 days old)
Is any package using functions of dpkg-perl or dpkg-python? If yes, I
think someone should take care of this packages and the bugs that are in
them. If not,
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
$ find /usr/man -exec dpkg -S {} \; |cut -d: -f1 |grep -v , |sort |uniq
Just parse a Contents-ARCH.gz file to find all packages that still have
/usr/man.
Roland
--
Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Previously Martin Michlmayr wrote:
to contact Brian as well. I'm posting to debian-devel now to ask if
anyone knows what's up with Brian.
He is alive, He uploaded a package on Dec 3, and his last message
to debian-devel was sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Nov 4.
Big brother is watching you :)
Hi Martin,
in the light of what has been discussed...
could you please replicate the bug and report
upstream?
thanks,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
[ Ben Armstrong writes ]
So, for subsections perhaps:
...
Education/Language
qvocab
I'd love an Education/Language section too.
I'm not really happy with any of the Menu choices available for my
kdrill program, which is a vocabulary quiz program,and dictionary for
kanji.
The
Hello
I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago.
Two questions:
1. Why are packages kept back like follows?
$ apt-get update apt-get upgrade
Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
Hit http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Release
Hit
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make to handle dependancies).
Not quite. dpkg-deb
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make to handle
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 08:22:52AM -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Yes, that was kind of my point.
An analogy would be that we don't need dpkg because most of its
functionality could be done by a mixture of tar, gzip, and perl (and maybe
make
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
Hello
I am running 'testing', upgraded from potato a few days ago.
Two questions:
1. Why are packages kept back like follows?
$ apt-get update apt-get upgrade
[ snip ]
The following packages have been kept back
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:39:04PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
Not quite. dpkg-deb actually does call out to tar and gzip, and lets those
programs do what they do best. It doesn't try to be tar and gzip and dpkg
all
at once. The UNIX approach is to build tools that do one or a few jobs
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Same idea, different implementation. It is using (de)compression code that is
shared with other programs.
Being linked to it statically means it doesn't share the code. This increases
dpkg code size.
Will we one day see a shared libdpkg, with more
Greetings,
IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
far seem to imply adding new fields to the debs, but his seems like
overkill to me.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:12:35PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Same idea, different implementation. It is using (de)compression code that
is
shared with other programs.
Being linked to it statically means it doesn't share the code. This
Cristian == Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cat /proc/cmdline auto rw root=/dev/nfs video=788
nfsaddrs=192.168.87.130:192.168.87.129:192.168.87.129:255.255.255.0:
Cristian ^
Cristian Am I seeing double or
Hi,
In my (potato) /var/cache is...
apache/ apt/ bind/ cracklib/ man/ man2html/ xfstt/
-Jim
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:32:12PM -0800, esoR ocsirF wrote:
Greetings,
IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
far seem to imply
esoR ocsirF wrote:
Greetings,
IANAD, but I would like to suggest an idea that I had. There has been a
lot of interest in getting packages arranged by different
catagorizations, something like the menu. Most ideas that I have seen so
far seem to imply adding new fields to the debs, but his
Neal H Walfield wrote:
I think that this is a reasonable idea, however, it only addresses a
small part of the problem. I feel that a better solution would be to use
a similar method to perl modules: a hierarchal name space. In fact, we
We'll have better than that :) My tool will have a full
I'll be off for a few days, so I may not be able to answer the
posts in RFC: pools... thread.
Happy New Year!!
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
On Thursday 28 December 2000 17:23, Michael Boman wrote:
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 01:13:50PM +0200, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
Hello..
Has anyone tried to set up any such debian systems?? I'm thinking of
trying to set up two machines sharing the same raid disksystem as
--
Arthur H. Edwards
712 Valencia Dr. NE
Abq. NM 87108
(505) 256-0834---BeginMessage---
I'm haveing some difficulty getting my network to accept mail messages.
I'm using exim through a cicso router. I have forwarded port 25 to my
mail machine. I am able to send mail to anyone. And I can receive
64 matches
Mail list logo
