Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony Towns
Hello world, Basically: don't do them. In more detail: it's possible, even easy with the recent versions of dpkg, to do source-only uploads to the archive. That is only upload a diff and a dsc (and maybe an orig.tgz), without any .debs at all. The most important problem this has is how katie

Re: Questions about testing

2001-01-02 Thread John O Sullivan
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 05:38:36 Branden Robinson wrote: Consider that when I manage to hork up X, I know about it within hours of dinstall. Likewise, a few days ago when Wichert busted the vim postinst, he was told about it quite fast indeed. I don't have any concrete recommendations for

bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Erik Hollensbe
Sorry for the crosspost, but I wanted to get this to those involved as such. Hopefully my tone won't sway you, if you read on I think you'll understand why. First, I regard debian as the 'best' linux distro out there. I recommend it to everyone. However, around the time of the potato release,

Re: Questions about testing

2001-01-02 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, John O Sullivan wrote: On a slightly related topic, packages that are updated everyday are a big headache for those of us that are living at the end of a modem, because we have to update many 10's of packages a day == lots of downloading. Its not a problem these days, but

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Mark W. Eichin
actually view what's being upgraded before you download 250 packages that That would be -u, and has been there for a long time (forever?) My only issue is that it isn't the default, really :-) And why are packages being REMOVED (lib-pg-perl for example) when I dist upgrade? Because that's

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
Erik Hollensbe wrote: However, around the time of the potato release, things in woody especially started falling to shit, mainly in stupid QC that could have been easily prevented. That's not my experience. I've seen breakage, but no more than is typical in unstable. In fact I've noticed a

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:06:18PM -0800, Erik Hollensbe wrote: And why are packages being REMOVED (lib-pg-perl for example) when I dist upgrade? Because thats what dist- stands for. If you dont want to remove conflicting or sperseeded packages, then dont use dist-upgrade but upgrade. apt-get

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:52:16PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: That's not my experience. I've seen breakage, but no more than is typical in unstable. In fact I've noticed a degree of holding back on releasing major upgrades (X 4, apt 0.4, etc) into unstable that is either commendable or a PITA

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: Eh? XFree86 4.x packages weren't held back at all. I released them to unstable as soon as they were ready. This waiting until things are ready before they are released is exactly the disturbing trend I was referring to. :-P -- see shy jo

Re: Questions about testing

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:03:44AM +, John O Sullivan wrote: On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 05:38:36 Branden Robinson wrote: I don't have any concrete recommendations for how to take this into account, but I certainly think that a 14-day waiting period for packages like these is excessive. I'm

Re: Boxed Penguin Prototype showcases customization of Debian to build infrastructure server

2001-01-02 Thread Sam Hartman
Bernd == Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bernd Hello Sam, On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 11:27:44PM -0500, Sam Bernd Hartman wrote: In order to actually get something done in an electronic office, we need a certain amount of infrastructure. Bernd Thanks for your work.

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:16:21AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Branden Robinson wrote: Eh? XFree86 4.x packages weren't held back at all. I released them to unstable as soon as they were ready. This waiting until things are ready before they are released is exactly the disturbing trend I

Re: finishing up the /usr/share/doc transition

2001-01-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 02:32:18PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: On the other hand, if we use a script now, we can be done tomorrow. When will the script be run, and which package will it belong to? Obviously it cannot be something which must be run manually, as the update script for Debian 1.3 to 2.0

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: You know, kinda like the way I went nuclear on Wichert when he broke vim. Just use abiword, who's maintainer never updates it(hi gecko). BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:06:18PM -0800, Erik Hollensbe wrote: However, around the time of the potato release, things in woody especially started falling to shit, mainly in stupid QC that could have been easily prevented. [...] have easily rendered a semi-production system completely dead

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:21:50AM -0500, Mark W. Eichin wrote: actually view what's being upgraded before you download 250 packages that That would be -u, and has been there for a long time (forever?) My only issue is that it isn't the default, really :-) put: Apt::Get::Show-Upgraded

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
== Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Some packages refuse to install, and of course, break apt in the process. Right now, I'm *hopefully* going to be able to repair a totally hosed server that failed an apt-get because MAN AND GROFF failed to install properly,

X broken after yesterdays dist-upgrade (sid)

2001-01-02 Thread Martin Maciaszek
When booting my workstation today I noticed that xdm won't come up. I tried starting X by hand and got the following error messages: Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol drmUnmap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is

maybe ITP rsync mirror script for pools

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Hi, I've been asked about my rsync mirror script, which is an extension from Joey Hess's one, on irc and here several times. So would there be intrest in a deb of the script coming with a debconf interface for configuration, cronjob or ip-up support and whatever else is needed to keep an

autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Russell Coker
My lilo configuration scripts need to be able to infer the correct location for the MBR. I am currently using the following algorithm: take root fs device from /etc/fstab and do the following: s/[0-9]*// s/part$/disc/ The latter is for devfs. Now for the benefit of RAID systems I need to do:

Re: X broken after yesterdays dist-upgrade (sid)

2001-01-02 Thread Petr Cech
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:37:05PM +0100 , Martin Maciaszek wrote: When booting my workstation today I noticed that xdm won't come up. I tried starting X by hand and got the following error messages: Symbol drmMap from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/mga_drv.o is unresolved! Symbol

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Russell Coker | My lilo configuration scripts need to be able to infer the correct location | for the MBR. I am currently using the following algorithm: | take root fs device from /etc/fstab and do the following: | s/[0-9]*// | s/part$/disc/ What is the use of the first s/? Unless your

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Bart Schuller
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | s/[0-9]*// | s/part$/disc/ What is the use of the first s/? Unless your first letter is a digit, it will just remove the zero-width string '' between the first / and the beginning of the string. A better solution will

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
== Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Russell Coker | My lilo configuration scripts need to be able to infer the correct location | for the MBR. I am currently using the following algorithm: | take root fs device from /etc/fstab and do the following: |

lynx 2.8.4dev.16 --with-ssl

2001-01-02 Thread Christoph Martin
Since ssl support (configure --with-ssl) is now integrated in the main lynx source, will lynx-ssl be obsolete? And will lynx has to go to non-US? Or do we still need separate version? Christoph -- Christoph Martin,

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Bart Schuller | On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | s/[0-9]*// | | s/part$/disc/ | | What is the use of the first s/? Unless your first letter is a digit, | it will just remove the zero-width string '' between the first / and | the beginning of the

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Goswin Brederlow | s/[0-9]$// | | which will remove 5 from /dev/hda5. | | You forgot /dev/hda17, which would become /dev/hda1 with your syntax. you are right. make that regexp a s/[0-9]+$// instead. -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
Bart Schuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | s/[0-9]*// | s/part$/disc/ What is the use of the first s/? Unless your first letter is a digit, it will just remove the zero-width string '' between the first / and the beginning of

Re: lynx 2.8.4dev.16 --with-ssl

2001-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since ssl support (configure --with-ssl) is now integrated in the main lynx source, will lynx-ssl be obsolete? And will lynx has to go to non-US? Or do we still need separate version? Since lynx is GPLed, surely we shouldn't be linking it to OpenSSL at

Re: ITP: ttf-xtt, xfonts-xtt

2001-01-02 Thread Arthur Korn
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb: So, I want to separate TrueType fonts and meta datas such that fonts.scale and fonts.alias included in xfonts-xtt-*. C'mon, it wont do any harm to ppl who are using LaTeX but not X11 if they have fonts.scale and fonts.alias installed but unused. They are not larger

RFP:postgresql 7.1beta1 SGBD

2001-01-02 Thread Christian BAYLE FTRD/DTL/ASR
Hello Postgresql 7.1beta1 is now available at ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/dev/ It is said to be stable What are your plans to release the package? Do you have any available version for testing? Do you have some advice to build this package? This package is needed to package sourceforge2.5

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* (Colin Watson) | Contrary to the subconscious assumption many people make, the first | priority for a regex is to match earliest, not to match longest. | regex(7) specifically mentions this: For a non-POSIX regex, that is. | However, stylistically s/[0-9]*// is better written as s/[0-9]+// |

Re: ITO: zope-popyda, python-popy

2001-01-02 Thread eric
Dear Debian developers, We regret to disturb this mailing list, but we feel that the previous email by Federico di Gregorio was an act of defamation towards PoPy and ZPoPyDA authors. We think that our problems with Federico di Gregorio as a member of Mixadlive S.r.l. board should be independent

Re: finishing up the /usr/share/doc transition

2001-01-02 Thread Ingo Saitz
MoiN On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:21:42PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Maybe I have architecure dependent documentation that should not be in share. Architecture dependent files go to /usr/lib, so I'd put them into /usr/lib/package/doc. You can symlink them from /usr/share/doc/package, too. If

Re: Huh, gcc 2.95.3?

2001-01-02 Thread zhaoway
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:18:51AM +0100, Matthijs Melchior wrote: Yes, OK, I was expecting a method that did not require to download the full package, just the index and a specific file then ask a mirror admin to provide the service (i.e. parse deb to get changelog etc. and

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 03 January 2001 00:24, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | My lilo configuration scripts need to be able to infer the correct | location for the MBR. I am currently using the following algorithm: | take root fs device from /etc/fstab and do the following: | s/[0-9]*// | s/part$/disc/

POSIX regular expressions (was: autodetecting MBR location)

2001-01-02 Thread Colin Watson
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * (Colin Watson) | Contrary to the subconscious assumption many people make, the first | priority for a regex is to match earliest, not to match longest. | regex(7) specifically mentions this: For a non-POSIX regex, that is. Could you point me to some

Re: ITP: ttf-xtt, xfonts-xtt

2001-01-02 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb: So, I want to separate TrueType fonts and meta datas such that fonts.scale and fonts.alias included in xfonts-xtt-*. C'mon, it wont do any harm to ppl who are using LaTeX but not X11 if they have

Re: POSIX regular expressions (was: autodetecting MBR location)

2001-01-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* (Colin Watson) | For a non-POSIX regex, that is. | | Could you point me to some documentation about this? regex(7) claims to | describe POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions, and describes leftmost-first | behaviour. Hmm. Strange. Mastering Regular Expressions by O'Reilly has something about

Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Bruce Perens
I built gtkhtml 0.8 and evolution 0.8 on unstable. Evolution says Can't initialize the Evolution shell. This appears to be a CORBA problem. Before I dive in, has anyone else dealt with it? Thanks Bruce

ITP ilisp

2001-01-02 Thread Craig Brozefsky
ILISP is a emacs interface to various lisp-like systems, including CMUCL and guile (which are already packaged for Debian). I've already coordinated with the upstream maintainer to have the debian subdir in the upstream CVS archive.

Re: finishing up the /usr/share/doc transition

2001-01-02 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Mon, Jan 1, 2001 at 12:20:32 -0800 (+), Joey Hess wrote: Ben Collins wrote: [snip] So it will need to: 1. Remove all symlinks in /usr/doc that correspond to symlinks or directories with the same names in /usr/share/doc 2. If there are any directories with the same names in

Re: ITP: ttf-xtt, xfonts-xtt

2001-01-02 Thread Arthur Korn
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb: For example, if ttf-xtt-* includes meta datas(fonts.alias, fonts.scale, tfm and so on) and when only fonts.alias update and upload. A user would download ttf-xtt-* package (include other files, they are not updated), if the user use the package only for TeX (not

Re: X broken after yesterdays dist-upgrade (sid)

2001-01-02 Thread Martin Maciaszek
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:32:00PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 12:37:05PM +0100 , Martin Maciaszek wrote: When booting my workstation today I noticed that xdm won't come up. I tried starting X by hand and got the following error messages: Symbol drmMap from module

Re: Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Bob Bernstein
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:56:58AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: I built gtkhtml 0.8 and evolution 0.8 on unstable. Evolution says Can't initialize the Evolution shell. This appears to be a CORBA problem. Before I dive in, has anyone else dealt with it? Only to the extent you are duplicating

Re: Huh, gcc 2.95.3?

2001-01-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 07:49:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:42:22AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: Ack!(tm). Not shades of rh7, I hope? I know that people using sid (like Uh, GCC 2.95.3 CVS NOT 2.96 OR 2.97! Please be careful what you say. We are talking

Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages

2001-01-02 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know about freshmeat (I only use it for the software search engine), but IMHO Sourceforge suffers just as much or probably even more so from the current Debian hierarchy problem: too generic or just overcrowded categories. That's two of the problems I'm

upstream packages with bad version number

2001-01-02 Thread Ingo Saitz
MoiN I just found that some (398) packages which seem to be build from upstream sources contain a bad version string. e.g.: adolc_1.8.7-3.tar.gz an_0.93-1.2.tar.gz an_0.93-2.tar.gz animals_19991226-4.1.tar.gz aolserver_3.0rc2-4.tar.gz apache-perl_1.3.12-1-1.24-2.tar.gz

Problem with start-stop-daemon and pidfile

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
Hi, I want to use start-stop-daemon to start the debian-mirror script if its not already running. I don't trust the script, so I run it as user mirror:nogroup. But then start-stop-daemon can't write a pidfile to /var/run. Whats the right[tm] way for this? root:~% start-stop-daemon -S -m -c

Re: upstream packages with bad version number

2001-01-02 Thread Brian May
Ingo == Ingo Saitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ingo MoiN I just found that some (398) packages which seem to be Ingo build from upstream sources contain a bad version Ingo string. e.g.: Ingo adolc_1.8.7-3.tar.gz an_0.93-1.2.tar.gz an_0.93-2.tar.gz Ingo

Re: Linux Progress Patch for Debian available!

2001-01-02 Thread Paul Hedderly
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:37:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Ferret Who recalls a cddb access program designed for blind people where cddb.com DENIED a certification because the program couldn't display a graphical logo where the blind people could see it. Presumably no blind

Re: Problem with start-stop-daemon and pidfile

2001-01-02 Thread Adam Heath
On 3 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Hi, I want to use start-stop-daemon to start the debian-mirror script if its not already running. I don't trust the script, so I run it as user mirror:nogroup. But then start-stop-daemon can't write a pidfile to /var/run. Whats the right[tm] way

Re: Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Frank Belew
-- snip-- I'm using the debs from deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian ./ And evolution runs for me. Can you try these debs and see if they fix any problems for you? -- Frank Belew [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with start-stop-daemon and pidfile

2001-01-02 Thread Goswin Brederlow
== Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 3 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: Hi, I want to use start-stop-daemon to start the debian-mirror script if its not already running. I don't trust the script, so I run it as user mirror:nogroup. But then

Re: Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Frank Belew's letter: -- snip-- I'm using the debs from deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian ./ And evolution runs for me. Can you try these debs and see if they fix any problems for you? i am using the helix debs on a

Re: Problem with start-stop-daemon and pidfile

2001-01-02 Thread Adam Heath
On 3 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: set -e test -x /usr/sbin/debian-mirror || exit 0 touch /var/run/debian-mirror.pid chown mirror.nogroup /var/run/debian-mirror.pid touch /var/log/debian-mirror.log chown mirror.nogroup /var/log/debian-mirror.log start-stop-daemon -S -m -c

Re: Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Bruce Perens
Ettore set me straight. The problem is that oaf is not looking in /usr/local/share/oaf , and if you do the default installation, CORBA won't work. Move the contents of /usr/local/share/oaf to /usr/share/oaf . Run oaf-slay. Various GNOME applications die. Start evolution. There may be a policy

Re: ITP: ttf-xtt, xfonts-xtt

2001-01-02 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb: For example, if ttf-xtt-* includes meta datas(fonts.alias, fonts.scale, tfm and so on) and when only fonts.alias update and upload. A user would download ttf-xtt-* package (include other files, they

IPv6 support in Debian

2001-01-02 Thread Brian May
Hello, I have posted this to both -ipv6 and -devel mailing lists, as I think it is an important issue to Debian as a whole. Is IPv6 a release goal for any future release of Debian ? The reason I ask is because in bug #80503, one of the responses was that IPv6 is not a release goal. However, I

Re: IPv6 support in Debian

2001-01-02 Thread Dancer Vesperman
I was under the impression that ipv6 was a release goal for woody. Not necessarily a _total_ showstopper, but more on the 'extremely desirable' sort of priority range. Certainly we have things like exim, lftp, ssh that work 'out of the box' with v6...and apps that work with v6 work (equally)

Re: IPv6 support in Debian

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 01:30:50PM +1100, Brian May wrote: Is IPv6 a release goal for any future release of Debian ? Debian doesn't do release goals per se. I for one would love to have Debian work out of the box with IPv6, but the only way for that to happen is for someone to actually do the

Re: autodetecting MBR location

2001-01-02 Thread Stephen Zander
Russell == Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Russell Right. The s/[0-9]+$// should do it. pedant mode=major s/\d+$// not s/[0-9]+$//. The former will continue to work in Unicode capable file-systems (assuming Linux ever supports such). /pedant Nothing to see here, move along...

Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-02 Thread Anthony Towns
Hello world, Basically: don't do them. In more detail: it's possible, even easy with the recent versions of dpkg, to do source-only uploads to the archive. That is only upload a diff and a dsc (and maybe an orig.tgz), without any .debs at all. The most important problem this has is how katie

Re: Anyone get Evolution 0.8 working?

2001-01-02 Thread Bob Bernstein
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:51:52PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: Ettore set me straight. The problem is that oaf is not looking in /usr/local/share/oaf , and if you do the default installation, CORBA won't work. Move the contents of /usr/local/share/oaf to /usr/share/oaf . Run oaf-slay. Various

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Branden Robinson wrote: You know, kinda like the way I went nuclear on Wichert when he broke vim. You use vi? Emacs rules. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Jim Lynch
Hi Eric. One of the things you said, is: Some packages refuse to install, and of course, break apt in the process. Right now, I'm *hopefully* going to be able to repair a totally hosed server that failed an apt-get because MAN AND GROFF failed to install properly, ending the upgrade process and

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Jim Lynch
One more thing... You are correct, that developers need to test and not cause syntax errors before uploading packages, even to unstable or woody. But people do, and -if- you're using unstable or woody in production, errors and problems you get are your responsability. If not, file appropriate

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Jim Lynch wrote: Hi Eric. One of the things you said, is: Some packages refuse to install, and of course, break apt in the process. Right now, I'm *hopefully* going to be able to repair a totally hosed server that failed an apt-get because MAN AND GROFF failed to

Re: dpkg-statoverride vs. suidmanager

2001-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
Aj and I were talking about this, and here's an alternative: * Make a new suidmanager package that predepends on the new line of dpkg packages and, in its preinst, converts everything to use statoverride. * Dpkg doesn't need any support for suidmanager conversion stuff at all. * Any package

Re: Important Note On Source-Only Uploads

2001-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Towns wrote: Basically: don't do them. Gack. I know several people have counted on this working in the past. Moreover, it's really a *good* thing, if you don't have a lot of control over your build environment. Let the autobuilders do it. The most important problem this has is how