El Vie 14 Sep 2001 21:00, Debian/SPARC Build Daemon escribió:
UNSUBSCRIBE
Salut,
J'aéi un petit problème de scripts debconf qui marche avec sid mais pas
avec potato.
Le message d'erreur en potato est :
Use of uninitialized value at /usr/lib/perl5/Debian/DebConf/ConfModule.pm line
118, GEN0 chunk 1.
Si quelqu'un à une idée ?
Christian
I've been perusing the bug catalogs, and I thought it might be useful
for others who want to help closing bugs, to see which maintainers
need the most help. Here's a list of the oldest bugs (also see the
list of bugs more than 2 years old at
master.debian.org/~ajt/oldbugs.html). Following that is
I installed sendmail 8.12.0 and had problems delivering mail to local users.
I get a Service Unavailable.
If I send from the local machine root gets a message indicating that
setreuid got a Operation not permitted.
What am I doing wrong?
Please reply to me direct since I have not yet resubscribed
Which packages are these? It's probably a bug in the package source, in
that it's coded in such a way that bin-nmu's aren't possible. There're
a bunch of packages like that. (ie, a Depends: otherpkg (= myver) line)
In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree not
On Saturday 15 September 2001 07:29, you wrote:
In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree
not installable.
Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (= ${Source-Version})'
dependency in debian/control. Is there any generic solution for the problem?
On 14 Sep 2001 16:37:20 +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
I'm about to take an extended vacation from being a Debian developer,
Think i would miss you, but to take your word: how about prototyping
co-maintenance on publib-dev? With a good upstream ... ;)
Some pkg i happen to have to compile
Tille, Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Edward Betts wrote:
I had the same problem, just worked out how to fix it, I used the chattr
program, see the chattr man page for more details.
Could you please be a little bit more detailed?
# chattr -V -i postgres.log.7.gz
Debian was easily installed on my Gateway Solo 3500 laptop, with ATI
Mach64 Rage Mobility graphics card
The best VGA console fonts are obtained by
# insmod atyfb
providing slim 80x30 fonts. However Xwindows does not stabilize
subsequently with this driver active, AND
# rmmod atyfb
fails because
On Sat 15 Sep 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
As of the next dinstall/testing run (a few hours away yet) there'll be a
new set of lines in the update_excuses output [0] (NB: it's now over a MB so
it's quite long and tedious). They look like:
Would it be possible to also offer a compressed version
also sprach Ardo van Rangelrooij (on Fri, 14 Sep 2001 07:06:52PM -0500):
Please do. Something like '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' or so? I'm still gonna
file against lists.debian.org. Once that is created we can move over. Do you
also support archiving? That would be really great.
alright. doing so
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 06:37:08PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
...and the new prerm remove it, and future versions of these scripts
until the end of ti^W^W^Wrelease after next...
Actually, if you'd also ship the symlink in the new .deb, dpkg would
remove it. Or am I missing your
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Sep-01, 18:37 (CDT), Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debconf question: do you want a symlink.
Please, no. The fact that debconf provides an easy, consistent way to
interact with the user does not mean that every possible choice that
a
Hello, fellow Debian developers !
dhelp was recently orphaned. IMHO a online help is quite a good idea,
but the code hasn't touched quite a while.
I ported the source code from db1 to db2, which is definitely needed
to make it work for woody.
Unfortunately dhelp_parse -r get stucked in the
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Paul Slootman uttered:
Would it be possible to also offer a compressed version of these files
(update_excuses.html, update_output.txt, etc)? Most browsers can handle
uncompressing these on the fly and it makes accessing these lists MUCH
faster. As a
SH == Stefan Hornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello, fellow Debian developers !
Hi,
dhelp was recently orphaned. IMHO a online help is quite a good idea,
but the code hasn't touched quite a while.
I ported the source code from db1 to db2, which is definitely needed
to make it work for
On 15-Sep-01, 09:14 (CDT), Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Sep-01, 18:37 (CDT), Edward Betts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your scheme works, but at least tell the sys admin what is going on with a
debconf note.
If you don't want to be
Hi,
Would it be possible to also offer a compressed version of these files
(update_excuses.html, update_output.txt, etc)? Most browsers can handle
uncompressing these on the fly and it makes accessing these lists MUCH
faster. As a porter I often use update_excuses for tracking down
packages
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:41:21AM +0200, Gerhard Tonn wrote:
On Saturday 15 September 2001 07:29, you wrote:
In my case it's esound-common, which in turn makes the entire gnome tree
not installable.
Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (= ${Source-Version})'
dependency in
Roland == Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a comment...
Roland Branden Robinson (2001-08-30 21:26:18 -0500) :
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:40:03PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
Build a fire for a man, an he'll be warm for a day. Set a
man on fire, and he'll be warm for
Package: debhelper
Version: 3.0.44
Severity: normal
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Most of the esound packages have a 'esound-common (= ${Source-Version})'
dependency in debian/control. Is there any generic solution for the problem?
You could manually tweak debian/substvars
help!
I'm the maintainer of gtk+extra (libgtkextra16, libgtkextra-dev) which is
quite out of date in testing, and I have no idea why. It has no RC bugs and
the dependencies are satisfied. Maybe I'm missing something that someone
can clue me into?
gtkmm (day 10) sorely needs to make it in as
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:11:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
Your scheme works, but at least tell the sys admin what is going on with
a debconf note.
If you don't want to be bugged change the debconf priority.
I've got it set to high. Apparently a number of maintainers think that
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 08:24:32PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
We can't really expect the admins to parse through hundreds of changelogs;
README.Debian would be a good place, though.
OTOH, apt-listchanges displays the changelog upon upgrade, whereas there's
no automated way to display changes to
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:34:38PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
We can't really expect the admins to parse through hundreds of changelogs;
README.Debian would be a good place, though.
OTOH, apt-listchanges displays the changelog upon upgrade, whereas there's
no automated way to display
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 06:34:38PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 08:24:32PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
We can't really expect the admins to parse through hundreds of
changelogs; README.Debian would be a good place, though.
OTOH, apt-listchanges displays the changelog
On 15-Sep-01, 13:24 (CDT), Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:11:20AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
There is already a standard, reliable way of communicating package
changes to the admin. Amazingly enough, it's called a changelog. I
usually find them under
Michael Bramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) notification mails
This is already fixed.
Verybody can stop the server to send this mails. And I send a
No it's not. You have to send an email for every package that you maintain.
This is simply unacceptable. If I don't stop receiving these
whatever the call is on how we should proceed in terms of Debian
apache package task force, i have created a mailing list, webpage, and
cvs repository for the crew.
you can subscribe at
https://lists.madduck.net/mailman/listinfo/debian-apache
you can post with
debian-apache at
There is something I do not understand about resolving hostnames. It seems the
search primitive of resolv.conf does not work properly in sid, nor in woody.
Let's see some of my configuration files :
resolv.conf
search lifl.fr univ-lille1.fr iut-info.univ-lille1.fr
[moving the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno BEAUFILS [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is something I do not understand about resolving hostnames. It seems the
search primitive of resolv.conf does not work properly in sid, nor in woody.
Let's see some of my configuration files :
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 01:49:34AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
People shouldn't have to sift through a bunch of entries of boring and
meaningless text (to them, at least :) to get such information...
The same being true of README.Debian. I like to know what changes
on my box, so I can anticipate
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:46:52PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Currently, most users probably don't read README.Debian unless they have a
good reason, so while it's the correct place to put things like this, they
aren't always seen. In the future, though, package management frontends
should
Simon Richter wrote:
Hrm, I just tried to build a package using
DH_OPTIONS=--dpkg-gencontrol-params=-v0.1-1.0.1 dpkg-buildpackage -B
In principle this could work, however current debhelper treats
--dpkg-gencontrol-params as equivalent to -u in
Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Getopt, so the -v
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:18:39PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:46:52PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Currently, most users probably don't read README.Debian unless they have
a good reason, so while it's the correct place to put things like this,
they aren't always
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not that hard to do this for a single package, but it is a completely
different matter to do it by hand for every newly-installed package. This
is something that frontends should simplify.
I have over a thousand packages
I'm trying to do a fresh sid install using my local partial mirror and I
get stuck with a debootstrap error 2. The problem is with
dists/sid/Release.
Is there a script which creates this file? I have tried to create a
valid version to match my mirror but had no success.
TIA
Lindsay
--
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 09:44:23PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
It's not that hard to do this for a single package, but it is a completely
different matter to do it by hand for every newly-installed package. This
is something
38 matches
Mail list logo
