On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
> +1000:
> > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
> > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
> > pu
Title: Welcome to Adobe GoLive 6
LA CUARESMA TERMINO,
PERO SIEMPRE HABRA VIENTO PARA VOLAR ESTAS UNICAS E INCREIBLES
CHI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The development of jNethack goes jnethack.sourceforge.jp, but I haven't
make a enough time to follow and maintain.
Current package is based on 1.1.5, but CVS version is 3.4.1-0.1.
Instead of dropping GTK+ mode support,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivo Marino wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tue, 13 May 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > It appears as though anyone who has an account can upload any package they
> > like. While this isn't a p
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
> +1000:
> > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
> > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
> > pu
Em Mon, 12 May 2003 21:24:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
>
> Will adding an icon remove that confusion? Perhaps those people, or
> others, will think that menu options with the famous 'swirl' icon are
> enabled, while others are not. I mean, the swirl has some kind of mo
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 12 May 2003, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> I've sent one version to solve all serious (#192409, #192458), and one
>> grave bug(#131779) to my repository[1].
>>
>> All patches applied on this version already was sent to the BTS and
>> are waiting the m
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:02:05AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > $ chmod -w f; touch -d 'next year' f; ls -l f
> > -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 666 2004-05-13 03:02 f
>
> You can only do that if you have write permissions to the directory the
> file is in; if not:
which is not quite true:
ga
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:10:58AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Gentlemen, what's the deal where one can change the dates on read-only files?
> $ chmod -w f; touch -d 'next year' f; ls -l f
> -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 666 2004-05-13 03:02 f
You can only do that if you have write permissions to
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> Ivo Marino wrote:
> > Of course we can't actually ensure that all uploaded packages on the
> > system are secure, for now we trust the testers of the system but in
> > future we'll introduce higher security standards.
> >
> > If someo
11 matches
Mail list logo