Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-12 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM > +1000: > > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages > > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to > > pu

LIQUIDACION DE KITES IMPORTADAS

2003-05-12 Thread DOMINICANOS
Title: Welcome to Adobe GoLive 6 LA CUARESMA TERMINO, PERO SIEMPRE HABRA VIENTO PARA VOLAR ESTAS UNICAS E INCREIBLES CHI

(no subject)

2003-05-12 Thread LIONHEAR

Bug#193125: RFA: jnethack -- The dungeon exploration game JNetHack (nethack with Japanese l10n)

2003-05-12 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: normal The development of jNethack goes jnethack.sourceforge.jp, but I haven't make a enough time to follow and maintain. Current package is based on 1.1.5, but CVS version is 3.4.1-0.1. Instead of dropping GTK+ mode support,

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-12 Thread Joe Nahmias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ivo Marino wrote: Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE - -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Tue, 13 May 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > It appears as though anyone who has an account can upload any package they > > like. While this isn't a p

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-12 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM > +1000: > > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages > > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to > > pu

Re: noicon.xpm?

2003-05-12 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Mon, 12 May 2003 21:24:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > Will adding an icon remove that confusion? Perhaps those people, or > others, will think that menu options with the famous 'swirl' icon are > enabled, while others are not. I mean, the swirl has some kind of mo

Re: Non-Official Fix of APT

2003-05-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 12 May 2003, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> I've sent one version to solve all serious (#192409, #192458), and one >> grave bug(#131779) to my repository[1]. >> >> All patches applied on this version already was sent to the BTS and >> are waiting the m

Re: can touch(1) readonly files

2003-05-12 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:02:05AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > $ chmod -w f; touch -d 'next year' f; ls -l f > > -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 666 2004-05-13 03:02 f > > You can only do that if you have write permissions to the directory the > file is in; if not: which is not quite true: ga

Re: can touch(1) readonly files

2003-05-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:10:58AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Gentlemen, what's the deal where one can change the dates on read-only files? > $ chmod -w f; touch -d 'next year' f; ls -l f > -r--r--r-- 1 jidanni jidanni 666 2004-05-13 03:02 f You can only do that if you have write permissions to

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote: > Ivo Marino wrote: > > Of course we can't actually ensure that all uploaded packages on the > > system are secure, for now we trust the testers of the system but in > > future we'll introduce higher security standards. > > > > If someo