Regarding a future Date: field for each package in Packages files,
* Should the field be called Date: or Time:?
* Should it be like "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:09:30 GMT" or "1061315862"?
* Should it refer to the time the developer finished wrapping the
package, or the time it entered the distribution?
Le mar 19/08/2003 à 23:33, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
> Oh ! non-free software !
>
> Thanks Richard for keeping me laughing.
Bah, if RMS really didn't like non-free software, he
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mar 19/08/2003 à 23:33, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> > http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i38
> >6.deb Oh ! non-free software !
> >
> > Thanks Richard for keep
Dear Customer,
Due to the large volume of Customer correspondence we have decided to
provide a forum for our Customers to communicate data discrepancies that
they discover while using our products. By visiting our website and
submitting your discrepancy via our on-line form we will be better equip
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Regarding a future Date: field for each package in Packages files,
> * Should the field be called Date: or Time:?
> * Should it be like "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:09:30 GMT" or "1061315862"?
> * Should it refer to the time the developer finished wrapping the
>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Brian May wrote:
> Effectively Jaldhar just needs to merge the source packages together,
> and keep the binary packages split.
>
> However, Jaldhar continues to respond with "we need the binary packages
> split.".
/me mutters chewbacca under his breath.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 00:43, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mar 19/08/2003 Ã 23:33, Mike Hommey a Ãcrit :
> > > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> > > http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i38
> > >6.d
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:20:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Source package has the following files (note: this is called a "source
> > package" not a "binary package"):
> >
> > webmin_1.100.orig.tar.gz
> > webmin_1.100-2.diff.gz
> > webmin_1
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 02:16, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> "The biggest deficiency in our free operating systems is not in the
>software--it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include in
>our systems. Documentation is an essential part of any software
>package; when an
This one time, at band camp, Colin Walters wrote:
>If someone here knows an alternate email address for Angus, could you
>resend this message there? Thanks.
Done.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq
Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
Specifically, I'm interested in learning who uploaded the spip package.
I know it lists Gaetan RYCKEBOER as the maintainer, but this individual
doesn't appear to be listed in the Debian keyring (this would mean they
couldn't have uploaded i
Sanyo Customer Service has received your email. We respond to emails
Monday -Friday 7:30 AM -4:00PM central time except for holidays. Please
allow us time to serve you The products that we are associated with are
Sanyo Televisions, VCRs,DVD players and Multimedia Remotes sold through
Wal-Mart.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
> Specifically, I'm interested in learning who uploaded the spip package.
> I know it lists Gaetan RYCKEBOER as the maintainer, but this individual
> doesn't appear to be l
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 02:16, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > "The biggest deficiency in our free operating systems is not in the
> >software--it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include in
> >our systems. Documentation is an esse
Subject of the message: Re: Thank you!
Recipient of the message: Robyn Elliott
Prohibited attachment: document_all.pif
Hi,
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
[...]
> listed in the list of NM applicants. So, I'm assuming that there must
> be a sponsor for the upload, but is this information kept anywhere?
You could gpg --verify the .dsc or .changes...
R
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:00:15PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
> Specifically, I'm interested in learning who uploaded the spip package.
> I know it lists Gaetan RYCKEBOER as the maintainer, but this individual
> doesn't appear to be l
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.1 (snapshot-20011025)
Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved.
Registered version for 2 domain(s).
Running on host: ns.sigloxxi.com
The file (part0002:application.pif) attached to mail (with subject: Re: That
movie) sent b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 206187 general
Bug#206187: apt-get update fails to get index package list and therefore does
nothing
Bug reassigned from package `apt' to `general'.
> merge 206187 199653
Bug#199653: SIGCHLD being ignored somewhere
Bug#206187: apt-get update
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:22:43AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:33:26AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
| > Now, I could do the dependency on python (>= 2.2), python (<<2.3) thing.
| > But what would that gain me or users? I see no benefit there, other than
| > people
We're sorry, but the list that you have tried to post to is an
announcement-only list and does not allow posts. All posts to the list
come from the list owner exclusively, or from authorized subscribers.
If you have questions regarding the posting policy of this list, please
contact the list own
21 matches
Mail list logo
