Hi,
regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
subsubversion?
I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
automake stuff. Since I switched to auotmake1.7 I have
亲爱的朋友: 您好!你的人生成功吗?你渴望您的事业飞黄腾达吗?我就渴望. 当
我22岁的生日还要用妈妈的钱买生日蛋糕的时候,说真的,我恨自己, 人生能有几
个20岁?我怎么能还在花父母的血汗钱,怎么能没有自己的理想, 没有自己的事业,没
有自己的未来?我想到,未来是否有属于我的一块土地,一片蓝天, 一个生活在我的声誉
和气息下的群体?学生可在校兼职，每星期安排一些时间在网上宣传即可））） 当一
切还在迷惘,当事业的脚步原地徘徊的时候,我找到了即将而且正在改变我一生的SOHO商务
网 http://money66.com/soho/index.asp?user= 我义不容辞的加
Le lun 13/10/2003 à 22:19, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > You're right as for static linking, I thought pkg-config supported
> > --static while it doesn't. Well, maybe it is better that way; I
> > personally feel we should deprecate the whole static linking stuff.
>
> In which case, we could easily
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I really feel we should get rid of all these static libraries. Who uses
> static linking now that even our glibc doesn't support it correctly
> across versions?
People who want their binaries to run across different Linux machines
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> there has been a lot of interest lately on tecniques to obtain a faster
> boot; for example
[...]
> http://www.fefe.de/minit/
[...]
> is anyone trying to implement the above in Debian?
I've implemented the runit package, somewhat s
Hi!
Which policy checker should I use?
Lintian apparently does not know about the new policy version.
#194257: lintian: Policy version 3.6.1.0 has been released
Package: lintian; Reported by: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 145 days old.
Linda apparently does not know about the new policy version
debian-devel:您好!
向您推荐几款Office2000增值软件
推荐一
软件名称：Office2000财务系统
软件简介：
本套财务软件与微软Office2000系统紧密集成，包括帐务,报表等部分，帐务部分包括凭证管理、账簿
查询，辅助管理、系统管理等主要功能，具有符合财务工作习惯、使用简便、上手快等优点。具有数量核算、
外币核算、银行对帐、部门及个人核算、项目管理等辅助核算功能，并且融入了微软Office2000自动感知技术
等先进性能，具有完善的数据备份和恢复功能，保证财务数据的绝对安全。细致的权限管理功能使您可以对使
用人员分配不同的操作权限，预
Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which policy checker should I use?
> Lintian apparently does not know about the new policy version.
> #194257: lintian: Policy version 3.6.1.0 has been released
> Package: lintian; Reported by: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 145 days old.
> Linda appar
Title: Message
MS Corporation Security Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On 2003-10-13 21:08 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I sent a mail to upstream two days ago, but didn't receive an answer
> yet. I will wait with uploading (or rather, looking for a sponsor)
> until I get an answer or run out of patience (maybe after a week of
> silence).
FYI: I just got an answer
Dear Cindy/Robert
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 03:32:23PM -0400, Robert Bulick wrote:
> I purchased "NEW LOOK HIS & HERS" Pattern # 6307. The front pattern
> piece for all of the fronts for the tops was missing. I'm going to
> Wal Mart to get another one, but thought I should let you know what
> happ
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gngeogui
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gunnm.org/~soda/softwares/gngeogui
* License : GPL
Description : GTK GUI-frontend for gngeo
gngeogui is a GUI-Front
At 6:46 pm, Tuesday, October 14 2003, Magos?nyi ?rp?d mumbled:
> Linda apparently does not know about the new policy version.
> It isn't even reported as a bug (filing it right now).
>
It does! Stop spreading lies, Linda 0.2.21 deals with Policy 3.6.1
correctly, but does not drop to testing immed
> This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it is
> orphaned upstream and has reached its end-of-life.
Speak-freely is not abandoned and should remain in Debian.
It was orphaned upstream, but it has NOT reached its end-of-life.
Development has moved to http://speak-freely.sour
Hi,
> >>Mozilla builds fine without libical.
> >What does happen, then? Will it still be able to read iCalendar events?
> I just uninstalled libical and mozilla calendar still seems
> to work fine for me.
Sounds like it is okay to remove the build-dependency on libical, then.
I just wanted to p
Hi!
Please take my apologies for "spreading lies".
Linda in sid does check against policy version 3.6.1 .
Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing?
Wait until python2.3 provides python (>= 2.3), or change
the dependencies of linda?
Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-stabl
At 10:05 pm, Tuesday, October 14 2003, Magos?nyi ?rp?d mumbled:
> Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing?
> Wait until python2.3 provides python (>= 2.3), or change
> the dependencies of linda?
>
I'm going to wait. Like I usually do.
> Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-
On 14-Oct-03, 03:38 (CDT), Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I really feel we should get rid of all these static libraries. Who uses
> > static linking now that even our glibc doesn't support it correctly
> > across ver
On 14-Oct-03, 07:00 (CDT), Magos?nyi ?rp?d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which road will you take to make linda fall into testing?
Why do you need it in testing? The whole point of it is to run against
packages you are building, and you should be building in unstable.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Andreas Tille wrote:
> regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
> Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
> subsubversion?
>
> I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
> automa
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [CCing debian-x because if I get hit by a bus or arrested by Secretary
> Ashcroft today, the following will be important for the inheritor of our
> XFree86 packages to know.]
Ah, for some reason I had trouble finding this mailing list. I poked aroun
Joel Baker writes:
> Many places do hosting of DNS domains (only; no web or mail, etc) for
> absurdly cheap rates ($5/mo in some cases), and allow either DDNS or an
> automateable webpage to do updates with.
I'm aware of these. While interesting should they start supporting SPF
they are not reall
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magosányi Árpád <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the policy manual there is no mention of the Uploader field of
>> debian/control. (version 3.6.1.0)
[...]
> the package control files. However Uploaders ends up in the dsc file
> and is not unsupported. Af
I hate to jump in but I really feel the need to correct the below. You
have a good number of points wrong.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:38:49AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I really feel we should get rid of all these static lib
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:09:32AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Which doesn't, in any way, promote the idea that we should keep the .la
> files. People who need/want a statically linked binary often want to
> control exactly *which* libraries are statically linked, and will build
> the link comm
Alioth is not accepting ssh connections and mail to a mailing list is
neither arriving nor bouncing.
I have mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but it occurs to me that if mail
is not getting through to the lists, it may not have got to that address
either.
--
Oliver Elphick
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:57:40AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:38:49AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > I really feel we should get rid of all these static libraries. Who uses
> > > static linkin
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:35:38PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:57:40AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:38:49AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > I really feel we sho
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 04:38, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> To name but a few. Just because there's little incentive to use static
> linkage when building Debian packages doesn't mean that we should
> deprecate it. Unless you're willing to convince the admin of the
> beowulf cluster next door to install li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libphysfs
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Ryan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.icculus.org/physfs/downloads/
* License : zlib
Description : A filesystem abstraction for game programmers
Phy
* Daniel Kobras
| If you ever tried to get, say, ten static libs in the right order
| for a medium-sized application, you know what tedious task I'm
| taking about. From my personal point of view, removal of .la files
| would significantly degrade Debian's usability as a build platform.
You can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netpanzer
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Authors: Matthias Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ivo Danihelka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tyler Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 12:48:28PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Often worse, due to the dramatically increased amount of data which
> must be loaded from disk in a cold-cache situation. Another 800K of
> glibc you've got to read in. The memory usage sucks too.
That's glibc. It's already in
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 13:06, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> * Package name: libphysfs
> Version : 0.1.9
> Upstream Author : Ryan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.icculus.org/physfs/downloads/
> * License : zlib
> Description : A filesystem
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 06:48, Julien Delange wrote:
> Description : GTK GUI-frontend for gngeo
"graphical frontend for gngeo"
> gngeogui is a GUI-Frontend to gngeo writed in Perl language. So, it
> works on many computers. It can configure gngeo, and show all roms,
> which are stored in a d
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 13:30, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Description : An online multiplayer tactical warfare game
Drop the "An."
> netPanzer is an online multiplayer tactical warfare game designed for
> play across the Internet and over LAN systems. One on one games are
> possible
* Joe Drew
[...]
| "gngeogui is a graphical frontend to gngeo which can configure gngeo as
| well as show all ROM game files stored in a directory. It also shows
| screenshots of each game.
|
| gngeogui uses GTK for its graphical interface."
It should also describe (in one sentence) what gnge
Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:09:32AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>> Which doesn't, in any way, promote the idea that we should keep the .la
>> files. People who need/want a statically linked binary often want to
>> control exactly *which* libraries are sta
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 02:00:31PM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> Anyway I feel it is a pity that the almost-stable distribution
> does not contain a checker for the current policy which is
> in effect since at least two months.
You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try readi
> there has been a lot of interest lately on tecniques to obtain a faster
> boot
It depends of what is machine meant to do.
If it's just a X workstation with some services run just for testing
purposes you can start just after syslog and xfs-xtt and X server.
I managed to lower the start time to
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 08:52:37PM +0200, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> It seemed to me that only the fields explicitly mentioned and those
> starting with X should be in the control files, but I cannot find
> it explicitly stated.
>
> Did I miss something?
Exactly what you wrote. The list of fields i
Hi!
I am asking your advice per policy section 10.9. [*]
/etc/zorp is mode 0700 in upstream. In a typical setup, almost
every single file under this directory contains sensitive information:
firewall rules, cryptographic keys, etc.
I think it justifies a lintian override.
What do you think?
[*
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:51:14PM +0200, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am asking your advice per policy section 10.9. [*]
>
> /etc/zorp is mode 0700 in upstream. In a typical setup, almost
> every single file under this directory contains sensitive information:
> firewall rules, cryptograph
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:21:23 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I understand all that, which is why I found statements such as those
> in
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> confusing. The fact is I can add SPF
> records for any IP numbers I want to domains I control. Thus if I
> want to be able
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:14:55PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It should also describe (in one sentence) what gngeo is.
Yes, you're right. So, I take your ideas and I will change the
description when I will package gngeogui.
Please excuse me, but I'm french, and my english is maybe poor. But,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> I will correct some poor english and make some editing changes too:
>
> "gngeogui is a graphical frontend to gngeo which can configure gngeo as
> well as show all ROM game files stored in a directory. It also shows
> screenshots of each
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I do not know, a priori, what the IP address is likely to be,
> and getting DNS changed for datasync.com would take days, not hours,
> by which time I would no longer be at the IP.
You'd just need something akin to the ddns services... but in
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:44:05PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 12:48:28PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Often worse, due to the dramatically increased amount of data which
> > must be loaded from disk in a cold-cache situation. Another 800K of
> > glibc you've got t
Manoj Srivastava said on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:40:15PM -0500:
> Consider this use case: I travel a lot, and stay in hotels
> with network connections. Unfortunately, these nigtly billed domains
> have very poor mail gateways; I've been burned before. I now connect
> directly and deliver
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-10-15
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lartc
Version : 1.41-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.lartc.org
* License : (Free)
Description : Linux Advanced Routing and Tr
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 18:30, Julien Delange wrote:
> Please excuse me, but I'm french, and my english is maybe poor. But, I
> try to write sentences, which can be understand.
Which is exactly why we send friendly corrections :)
--
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
My weblog doesn
(I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
which Debian does have available.
I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot. It
failed because it could not find a package. Perhaps, this is a bug
Manoj writes:
> Consider this use case: I travel a lot, and stay in hotels with network
> connections. Unfortunately, these nigtly billed domains have very poor
> mail gateways; I've been burned before. I now connect directly and
> deliver mail from the MTA on my laptop.
> I do not know, a priori,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt.
Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check
for when updating a package would be very useful. (I've just agreed
to take over a few more packages, two which havn't been updated since
woody.)
-
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Alioth is not accepting ssh connections and mail to a mailing list is
> neither arriving nor bouncing.
I noticed the same from work earlier today, and the same from home now.
:-(
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
>
> I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
> which Debian does have available.
>
> I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:40:15PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:21:23 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I understand all that, which is why I found statements such as those
> > in
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> confusing. The fact is I can add SPF
> > records
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:31:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt.
>
> Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check
> for when updating a package would be very useful. (I've just agreed
> to ta
Andreas Tille wrote:
> regarding to bug #215554 I would like to ask for my personal clarification:
> Which sens makes automake if the resulting output depends from every new
> subsubversion?
>
> I've thought that I would do the wordnet program some good if I would add
> automake stuff. Since I sw
Prospectus Intelligence (ASAP Translations Team) specializes in translating
your documentation into any major foreign language so that it reads as though
it were originally written in the language itself.
When you need to:
- Market your products & services internationally
- Create foreign lang
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:45:15PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> gngeogui uses GTK for its graphical interface."
Don't forget that (I believe) the official spelling of the library's
name is "GTK+".
--
G. Branden Robinson|It's like I have a shotgun in my
Debian GNU/Linux
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:05:40AM +0200, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> * Package name: lartc
> Version : 1.41-1
> Upstream Author : Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.lartc.org
> * License : (Free)
Uh, that's not specific enough.
What actual license
62 matches
Mail list logo
