On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:59:45PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I do not know enough about what X resource files are supposed to look
> like to identify this bug for sure. However, I notice that the
> /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources file from Daniel's experimental X4.3.0 debs
> appears to have had all it
Matt Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Amazing. dselect managed to mention 4 relationships, but not that one.
> "There has to be a beter way..."
Erm, actually, I just took another look at your original mail and saw
the provides line at the bottom. Still, I would suggest giving
aptitude a try
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thanks! I was wondering if it wouldn't have been clearer to say
> > that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms
> > Conflicts with xmms. Any thoughts?
>
> xmms both provides and conflic
Matt Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks! I was wondering if it wouldn't have been clearer to say
> that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms
> Conflicts with xmms. Any thoughts?
xmms both provides and conflicts (with) alsa-xmms; dselect just only
chooses to mention
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rng-tools
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkernel/
* License : GPL
Description : Daemon to use a hardware RNG
This package provides rn
--- "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the erstwhile alsa-xmms maintainer, I can officially confirm
> Cameron's explanation: the latest upstream XMMS version (1.2.8)
> incorporates the ALSA plugin itself, so there's no longer any need for
> a separate package and you should go ahead an
Julian Mehnle wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Julian Mehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It's about forging an e-mail sender's identity. By preventing
> > > the unauthorized use of domains as the sender domain of e-mails,
> > > most of the practiced cases of identity forgery are prevented.
Branden Robinson wrote:
> No, it's a problem for programs that use cpp to parse X resource files.
>
> In particular, I noticed that xdm broke due to a mangled
> /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources file when built with cpp 3.3 instead of cpp 3.2.
I do not know enough about what X resource files are supposed t
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:45:07PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
>> GNU Sysutils is intended to compliment coreutils. These utilities
>> are ones that are either primarily useful to system administrators,
>> or would need to be installed by a system admi
As the erstwhile alsa-xmms maintainer, I can officially confirm
Cameron's explanation: the latest upstream XMMS version (1.2.8)
incorporates the ALSA plugin itself, so there's no longer any need for
a separate package and you should go ahead and remove the obsolete
alsa-xmms package in favor of the
2003-10-15, sze keltezéssel Matthew Palmer ezt írta:
> It's not as though anyone is going to beat you up because of a Lintian
> warning. Are we having "my package is cleaner than yours" contests? (Maybe
> we should, considering some of the crud I've seen in NMUs I've built).
I have always thoug
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> runit is okay, and it has debian packages already. What i didn't like
> about runit is the "forest" of processes it creates. The output of
> pstree is really fancy. ;-) Minit seems to be able to do most of this
> without using that m
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:29:27AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
> > > which Debian does have availabl
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 07:48:33PM +0200, W. Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a few days ago, I uploaded an emacs mode package (all) source only
> w/o problems to ftp-master. Today, a source only upload was rejected.
> Why? I think, we should get rid of binary uploads...
>
> Cheers!
Please search the
Hi,
a few days ago, I uploaded an emacs mode package (all) source only
w/o problems to ftp-master. Today, a source only upload was rejected.
Why? I think, we should get rid of binary uploads...
Cheers!
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:37:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
> >
> > I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
> > which Debian does have availa
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> know the latest policy version. IMHO it is a lintian bug to hardcode the
> policy version to check against instead at least verifying an installed
> policy version.
IBTD. It is feature, you get nice warning that some of lintian's
warnings might be
Sam Hocevar wrote:
> ... or fix the timestamps of the various auto* files before calling
> configure. Use something like this: (order is important)
>
> touch configure.ac \ (or configure.in)
> && touch aclocal.m4 \
> && touch configure \
> && touch config.h.in \
Keressen havi több ezer dollárt könnyû internetes munkával! Részletek: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
* Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031015 11:31]:
> - disabling of services in a consistent way (some are disabled via
> /etc/defaults/package, some expect you to edit the init.d script,
> some suggest removing the links)
I think removing the link is the way to go.
> - hooks for other init
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: etw
Version : CVS
Upstream Author : Gabriele Greco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://etw.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : arcade-style soccer game
Eat The Whistle is an arcade soccer game si
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I'd better send all my passwords and serial numbers here. In
> > case my hard disk crashes I can always recover it from the mailing list
> > archives. SCNR.
>
> Isn't this basically how Linus does/
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> There is now (as of 2 days ago) an Alioth project for the Debian
> packaging, and it has a mailing list:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-public
Thanks - I'm going to subscribe this soon ...
> That shouldn't make any dif
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Perhaps I'd better send all my passwords and serial numbers here. In
> case my hard disk crashes I can always recover it from the mailing list
> archives. SCNR.
Isn't this basically how Linus does/says to do his backups? Or was that
someone else?
Mik
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 14:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was a debian-postgresql list but it seems to have died ... :-(
There is now (as of 2 days ago) an Alioth project for the Debian
packaging, and it has a mailing list:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-postgresql-p
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:53:06AM -0700, salah rahhal wrote:
> Hi there I'm Salah and i tried many times to get the
> serial number for my software demo from
> the resource, but unfortunately the server rejected my
> e.mail because they want (not free
> e.mail) to contact me ,,so i searched the
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:23:24PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>Just for an example where it annoys me: I use lintian.d.o as a summary
> of my lintian warnings because it gives me a nice overview of what needs
> to be done, and I always need to manually filter out newer-standards-
> version warn
Hi,
there was a debian-postgresql list but it seems to have died ... :-(
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 15 15:39:10 2003
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:40:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the Pos
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> People in general seem to get unnecessarily het up about Lintian
> warnings. They're intended as advice to be read and understood by
> humans, not as things you should be blindly counting.
Just for an example where it annoys me: I use lintian.d.o as
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:31:01PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >Try reading upgrading-checklist.txt.
> >
> > Where do I get a copy of this document? A summery of what to check
> > for when updating a packa
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 10:21:07PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [lintian warnings about newer-standards-version]
> > It is not fair to issue warnings against a package if the warning
> > should be intended to the checker itself.
>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:04:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
[lintian warnings about newer-standards-version]
> It is not fair to issue warnings against a package if the warning should be
> intended to the checker itself.
It's not as though anyone is going to beat you up because of a Lintian
war
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:39:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> There are more serious lintian errors like missing-depends-line (nine
> packages - nine RC bugs). If the maintainer would have used lintian
> these bugs would have never existed.
>...
A small correction:
While preparing the bug
As an ex-Debian-developer I'd like to introduce a tool only few Debian
maintainers seem to know about:
lintian
It's e.g. described in Chapter 7 of the "Debian New Maintainers' Guide"
[1] and there's a server that runs daily lintian over all (i386)
packages [2].
lintian does not catch all err
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:05:40AM +0200, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-10-15
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: lartc
> Version : 1.41-1
> Upstream Author : Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.lartc.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:28:09AM +0200, Gerrit Pape wrote:
[...]
>
> Regards, Gerrit.
init
minit
runit
Gerrit!
Sounds like a name conflict ;)
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
-
Hi there I'm Salah and i tried many times to get the
serial number for my software demo from
the resource, but unfortunately the server rejected my
e.mail because they want (not free
e.mail) to contact me ,,so i searched the web for any
real e.mail to feed back the installation
site, and by chan
Thank you for your interest in Wildform Wild fx 3 DEMO for MacOS.
Your user name and serial number enable you to install your copy of Wildform
Wild fx 3 DEMO for MacOS.
Please save this information so that you can install or reinstall your software.
username: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
ser
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> Not really; the people complaining about newer-standards-version serve
> to remind the lintian maintainer that he needs to update lintian for any
> changes in policy. :) Updating lintian is not just a matter of
> increasing the number.
Well for sure. But
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>See also /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
Thanks for the hint, which hopefully prevents me from any future automake
caused frequent wordnet uploads.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would love to do so but it happened to me that the files I created seem
> to depend from automake. I do not call any automake script - just
> the usual
>configure; make; make install
> but I had to add a build-dependency f
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading
> > upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check
> > packages, rather than inspecting th
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would love to do so but it happened to me that the files I created seem
> to depend from automake. I do not call any automake script - just
> the usual
>configure; make; make install
> but I had to add a build-dependency from automake accordin
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:32:20AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading
> > upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check
> > packages, rather than inspecting them
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
> You assign way too much value to the latest two revisions. Try reading
> upgrading-checklist.txt. In general, relying on automated tools to check
> packages, rather than inspecting them manually based on actual (*gasp*!)
> knowledge of policy, isn't partic
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Santiago Vila wrote:
> In general, Debian source packages should not need to build-depend on
> automake. In theory, the author should already care to create an
> original tarball with all the required things already created
> (in fact, it is part of GNU standards that packages
Hi,
i have working minit packages (not sure if i uploaded them to
ppl.d.o/~erich/boot/ yet) and i've been using them for weeks to init my
system.
There are a couple of open issues, that is why i didn't upload them.
for example current init-scripts are not aware of the monitoring
capabilities; when
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:20:15PM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> (I thought I sent this, but now I cannot find it to be sure.)
>
> I'd like to build against sid on a machine (ia64) I don't own but
> which Debian does have available.
>
> I tried the recipe from the developer's manual using fakeroot.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:54:41PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > No, you understood it correctly. That's exactly the point.
>
> If I can configure my domain with a list of IPs from which mail claiming to
> originate from it must come without having a static IP and without the
> cooperation of th
Le mar 14/10/2003 à 19:44, Daniel Kobras a écrit :
> Still, this whole prelink issue is tangent to the main
> point: There are valid reasons for static linking, and I oppose the
> blanket statement that we should deprecate this method.
And there are also good reasons to change our policy regarding
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 10:15:31PM -0700, Matt Bonner wrote:
| It seems that as a couple, xmms and alsa-xmms are likely to break up
| soon. Can anyone help them? Or at least me?
The latest xmms package has the alsa plugin included, so the alsa-xmms
package is no longer needed. i.e. the couple
Hi,
(Please CC me, I'm not on this list.)
Today in dselect (I use testing) I got this bit of wisdom, please
advise me how best to report this problem:
*-* Opt soundxmms Versatile X audio player that looks like Winamp
**- Opt soundalsa-xmms
--
52 matches
Mail list logo
