US Stock Market: AZAA - Military Aircraft Related Stock...dave

2003-11-06 Thread Silas Shepherd
US Stock Market - UP On the NEWS...AZAA BREAKING NEWS - TUCSON, Ariz.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Arizona Aircraft Spares, Inc. (OTCBB: AZAA) - one of the leading military aircraft spare parts manufacturers - announces it has signed a letter of commitment with Wolfe and Turner Investments to obtain a 6

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Greg Stark
Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Regardless. Having people install fresh machines with things like Postgres 7.2 is just embarrassing. I am not embarrassed. Well perhaps you should be. Whenever they ask for support those users will be told the version their running is hopelessly

Re: Bug#219279: ITP: py2play -- A peer-to-peer network game engine in Python

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
Marc Dequènes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: py2play Version : 0.1.5 Upstream Author : Jiba [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL or Web page : http://oomadness.tuxfamily.org/ * License : GPL Description : A

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.11.06.0243 +0100]: about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or linux-* ? If alternative kernels in debian become more popular, is there a potential for confusion in the future? [...] Martin Kraaft?

Looking for Greg Hookey

2003-11-06 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone seen any activity from Greg Hookey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Greg is in the NM queue, but has been put on hold by his AM (madkiss), for reasons I am unaware of, but which I understand included being uncontactable. He has not been contactable

Re: [coreutils,hppa] - touch broken on hppa

2003-11-06 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Marek Habersack wrote: It seems that touch(1) is broken on hppa: [...] The above is on the same machine but not inside the chroot. In the first case the version of coreutils is 5.0, in the latter 5.0.91. Seems like a bug in coreutils 5.0 which has been fixed in

upstream takeover of wmacpi

2003-11-06 Thread Sebastian Henschel
hello list.. in short: i want your blessing. :) well, some of you might be aware of some problems with wmacpi, see also the bug list at debian: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkgdata=wmacpiarchive=no meanwhile, simon fowler has developed a new version of wmacpi (but very

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] also, you did break userland yourself as well, otherwise how would you explain the patches RedHat made to the XFree86 server? actually, unmodified XFree86 works just fine. It will have an executable stack but it will work out of box - so no

Re: [coreutils,hppa] - touch broken on hppa

2003-11-06 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:55:50AM +0100, Santiago Vila scribbled: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Marek Habersack wrote: It seems that touch(1) is broken on hppa: [...] The above is on the same machine but not inside the chroot. In the first case the version of coreutils is 5.0, in the

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread pageexec
[...] also, you did break userland yourself as well, otherwise how would you explain the patches RedHat made to the XFree86 server? actually, unmodified XFree86 works just fine. It will have an executable stack but it will work out of box - so no app was broken. false! my unmodified X

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: actually, unmodified XFree86 works just fine. It will have an executable stack but it will work out of box - so no app was broken. false! my unmodified X server (gentoo) dies with the following core when trying to run it under [1]: you need to

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread era+debian
On 06 Nov 2003 01:06:25 -0500, Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted to debian-devel: Personally I'm of the opinion that stable is useless. It certainly has no use for me. Perhaps if I ran a production server on debian I might think otherwise but I rather doubt it. When I had production

debian-devel@lists.debian.org

2003-11-06 Thread
103523 http://www.fwok.com 0571-63711251 311300 111

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread pageexec
You are trying to make a big fuss about this for no good reason. Ingo, please. it was *you* who objected to PaX's default enforcement policy because it broke Linus's rule. yet you did the same with your own default *and* contested the fact that you hadn't broken anything. i don't have a problem

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] incidentally, if i were to make use of PT_GNU_STACK in PaX, i could claim the same - now what was your point of fighting this silly issue? yes, this was precisely my point to discuss this issue. Executability of the stack is not some divine

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Zenaan Harkness [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I search for packages, I think I'd prefer (assuming I want to see all kernel- type packages), I'd prefer kernel-linux-*, kernel-hurd-*, kernel-freebsd-*, etc. Instead of trying to cram that into package names, would it not be more appropriate

Re: [coreutils,hppa] - touch broken on hppa

2003-11-06 Thread Paul Telford
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Marek Habersack wrote: Hello, It seems that touch(1) is broken on hppa: ... Does anybody have access to any other hppa machines except for those which are accessible for the DDs to confirm the above problem? Confirmed. Linux zaphod 2.4.18-pa35 #2 Thu Jun 6 08:36:33

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there's nothing wrong about an executable stack though. It's been part of Linux ever since. the brk() managed heap has also been executable. yet you break apps that assume so (the ominous XFree86 server would also use the brk() managed heap if

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread pageexec
[...] randomization serves NO purpose in the grand scheme, it does not provide guaranteed protection against the PaX attack model (arbitrary read/write access to the address space). [...] there's another, practical aspect of address-space randomization which i find to be the most

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread pageexec
It is in fact a simulation of a multithreaded application. [...] The test incorrectly assumes that thread stacks are executable. I suspect we both agree that it's desirable to have thread stacks non-executable as well. while i agree with you on this one, it is in stark contrast to what you

Bug#219447: Networking/PCMCIA startup issues (sarge)

2003-11-06 Thread Max Cohan
Package: General Version: Sarge The pcmcia-cs init script runs AFTER networking. If your primary network card is on a pcmcia card (as with a laptop) this requires you to run 'networking start' after boot. Solution: 1) Add/Move the 'pcmcia' init script to /etc/rcS.d/ (I have it as 'S37pcmcia'

Re: upstream takeover of wmacpi

2003-11-06 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:31:30AM +0100, Sebastian Henschel wrote: in short: i want your blessing. :) Go, go, go! Just package the thing as wmacpi and be happy. -- Marcelo

Bug#219452: ITP: jabberoo -- library for interaction with Jabber

2003-11-06 Thread Goedson Teixeira Paixao
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2003-11-06 Severity: wishlist * Package name: jabberoo Version : 1.9.0.1 Upstream Author : Thomas Muldowney [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://jabberoo.jabberstudio.org/ * License : LGPL Description : library for

Bug#219447: Networking/PCMCIA startup issues (sarge)

2003-11-06 Thread Sam Hocevar
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003, Max Cohan wrote: The pcmcia-cs init script runs AFTER networking. If your primary network card is on a pcmcia card (as with a laptop) this requires you to run 'networking start' after boot. I suggest you read /usr/share/doc/pcmcia-cs/FAQ.Debian.gz: oThe PCMCIA

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread John Belmonte
Marek Habersack wrote: * License : GPL, LGPL, Public Domain What does this mean exactly? My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's the case, the library as a whole must be considered to be under the GPL,

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The test incorrectly assumes that thread stacks are executable. I suspect we both agree that it's desirable to have thread stacks non-executable as well. while i agree with you on this one, it is in stark contrast to what you said earlier:

Cotton

2003-11-06 Thread Robert Yadgarov
Dear Sir, I acquired your email address from a Cotton Website that portrayed your company as a leading exporter of raw cotton within the CIS. I am interested in establishing a relationship with a company that can supply me between 20,000 to 40,000 bails a month CIF Mexico. Please let me know

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:38AM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled: Marek Habersack wrote: * License : GPL, LGPL, Public Domain What does this mean exactly? It's a mix of licenses of the source files composing the library. My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under

Bug#219453: ITP: tigr-glimmer -- [Biology] gene detection in bacteria

2003-11-06 Thread Steffen Moeller
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: tigr-glimmer Version : 2.12 Upstream Author : Art Delcher [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven Salzberg [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Harmon [EMAIL PROTECTED], Simon Kasif [EMAIL PROTECTED], Owen White [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:53:38AM -0500, John Belmonte wrote: Marek Habersack wrote: * License : GPL, LGPL, Public Domain What does this mean exactly? My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's

Fwd: Bug#219258: openmosix patches do not apply cleanly to debian kernels

2003-11-06 Thread Daniel Rogério de Souza
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Em Qua 05 Nov 2003 11:52, Stephen Frost escreveu: * Daniel Rog?rio de Souza ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: OpenMosix Kernel Patch patch for 2.4.20 does not apply cleanly That I can believe but I'm not entirely sure which way I'd like to go with

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:05:22PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:47:41PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (local.debian-devel) you wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: synaptic-touchpad Version :

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the time. /me hands Josip an Excellence in Un-self-conscious Irony Award -- G. Branden Robinson|A committee is a life form with six Debian

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-06 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:23:09PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:05:22PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:47:41PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (local.debian-devel) you wrote: Package: wnpp Severity:

Re: Bug#219163: ITP: synaptic-touchpad -- Synaptics TouchPad driver for XFree86

2003-11-06 Thread Tobias Wolter
On 2003-11-06T13:23:09-0500 (Thursday), Branden Robinson wrote: [synaptic-touchpad] It may be a good idea to go ahead and package it, though I am not sure you have picked the best name for it. My .02 Euro: Try xfree86-driver-$module. I wouldn't go as far as using something like

rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers

2003-11-06 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]: Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is this dependes really necessary? without further checks of feasibility What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux? This will prevent

Re: Bug#219293: ITP: songwrite -- a tablatures editor and player

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:16, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: songwrite Description : a tablatures editor and player Drop the leading 'a'. Songwrite is a tablatures (guitar partitions) editor and player entirely written in Python. Is 'partitions' the right word here? (I

Re: Bug#219301: ITP: arkhart-data -- Data for the Ark roleplaying kernel

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:42, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: arkhart-data Description : Data for the Ark roleplaying kernel Don't capitalise Data. Powerful and flexible framework to create (networked/single player) role playing games, without having to write a single line of

Re: Bug#219302: ITP: worlded -- World editor for Ark roleplaying kernel

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:44, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: worlded Description : World editor for Ark roleplaying kernel Don't capitalise World. Tool to construct a world for Ark, a roleplaying game kernel. More detail is needed here. What can worlded do to the Ark world?

Re: rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers

2003-11-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:55:03PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]: Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is this dependes really necessary? without further checks of feasibility What not rename

Re: rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers

2003-11-06 Thread Adam Heath
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Eduard Bloch wrote: #include hallo.h * Otto Wyss [Sun, Nov 02 2003, 10:21:14AM]: Since when does the package libc6-dev depend on linux-kernel-headers? Is this dependes really necessary? without further checks of feasibility What not rename linux-kernel-headers to

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread John Belmonte
Marek Habersack wrote: My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's the case, the library as a whole must be considered to be under the GPL, correct? Yes, that's the case. I just wanted to highlight the fact that

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:59:26PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the time. All the time? ... Someone has been saying that every once in a while for the last N years. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:51:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the time. /me hands Josip an Excellence in Un-self-conscious Irony Award I was merely responding to a sentence written with the same beginning, but now

Re: Sarge Jigdo files incompatible with Debian mirror

2003-11-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:17:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: I wanted to try Sarge installer for a new box and thus I used jigdo with http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i386-1.jigdo Unfortunately one package seems to be removed from the mirrors (see

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 05-Nov-03, 19:14 (CST), Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or linux-* ? If alternative kernels in debian become more popular, is there a

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Darren Salt
I demand that Greg Stark may or may not have written... Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, no need to Cc: me - or did Gnus not notice the Mail-Followup-To header? Uhm. What Mail-Followup-To header? I didn't receive one on this message, perhaps it's stripped by the mail server? Or

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 05-Nov-03, 19:14 (CST), Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or

hi, ChineseRen

2003-11-06 Thread a little news
http://218.130.220.10/

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread John Belmonte
Chad Walstrom wrote: My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's the case, the library as a whole must be considered to be under the GPL, correct? Not necessarily. If work is done on the Public Domain portion of

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:22:31PM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled: Marek Habersack wrote: My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's the case, the library as a whole must be considered to be under the GPL,

webmin and usermin package descriptions

2003-11-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
There was discussion here a while ago about the package descriptions in webmin and usermin not quite being up to snuff. Now that the package reorganization has been completed, would someone (Joe?) like to review them and give me some better ones? The source packages are webmin webmin-optional

Re: Bug#219293: ITP: songwrite -- a tablatures editor and player

2003-11-06 Thread Brian Nelson
Joe Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 09:16, Marc Dequnes wrote: * Package name: songwrite Description : a tablatures editor and player Drop the leading 'a'. Songwrite is a tablatures (guitar partitions) editor and player entirely written in Python. Is

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Steve Greenland
On 06-Nov-03, 13:47 (CST), Keegan Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: Surely these won't all show up in the same Packages file...if you're running GNU/KFreeBSD, it will be a FreeBSD kernel, right? Why would the Linux and Hurd

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:50:52PM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled: Chad Walstrom wrote: My guess is that it means some parts of the library are under GPL, some under LGPL, and some in the public domain. If that's the case, the library as a whole must be considered to be under the GPL,

Re: Bug#219276: ITP: ircopm-ptlink -- Open Proxy Monitor for PTlink IRCd

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:19, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: ircopm-ptlink Description : Open Proxy Monitor for PTlink IRCd Open Proxy Monitor isn't a proper noun, and as such should not be capitalized here. PTlink is an advanced IRC server, used by the Portuguese PTLink

Re: Bug#219251: ITP: ircservices-ptlink -- IRC Services for PTlink IRCd

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 06:21, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: ircservices-ptlink Description : IRC Services for PTlink IRCd De-capitalize Services. PTlink is an advanced IRC server, used by the Portuguese PTLink network It is fast, reliable, and powerful with good support for

Re: Bug#219277: ITP: gnusound -- Powerful sound editor

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Drew
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:21, Marc Dequènes wrote: * Package name: gnusound Description : Powerful sound editor s/Powerful // - let the user determine that. GNUsound is a sound editor for Linux. It supports multiple tracks, multichannel output, and 8, 16, or 24/32 bit samples. It

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread John Belmonte
Marek Habersack wrote: Quoting from the nettle manual: Nettle is distributed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) (see the file COPYING for details). However, most of the individual files are dual licensed under less restrictive licenses like the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL),

Re: Bug#218832: ITP: libnettle -- a low-level cryptographic library

2003-11-06 Thread Marek Habersack
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 05:21:59PM -0500, John Belmonte scribbled: Marek Habersack wrote: Quoting from the nettle manual: Nettle is distributed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) (see the file COPYING for details). However, most of the individual files are dual licensed under

Re: Looking for apt-get internals guide

2003-11-06 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said: (this is debian-devel material; please followup there) OK. For those who missed the original post on -mentors - I'm in charge of some non-standard packages for a company I work for, and I would like to write a hook into apt that does things

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Ryan Underwood
Hi, On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 05-Nov-03, 19:14 (CST), Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or

Re: Looking for apt-get internals guide

2003-11-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:31:44PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:46:39PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: But, I don't see why you should need to hook into apt at all in order to do what you want. If the files you change are conffiles, your changes should be preserved,

Bug#219507: ITP: gtkscintilla2 -- Gtk-2 wrappers for the Scintilla source editing components

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan Oxer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: gtkscintilla2 Version : 0.0.8-aj Upstream Author : Andy Jeffriess [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dennis J Houy [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.gphpedit.org/, http://http://sourceforge.net/projects/moleskine * License

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:14:31PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 05-Nov-03, 19:14 (CST), Jonathan Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or

Re: kernel package names (was Re: Package libc6-dev depends on linux-kernel-headers)

2003-11-06 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:43:52PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 20:14, Jonathan Dowland wrote: I'm in two minds whether or not to ask this, but I've been wondering about the naming scheme for linux packages - kernel-*. Why not linux-kernel-* or linux-* ? If alternative

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

2003-11-06 Thread Yven Johannes Leist
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 07:28, Graham Wilson wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:49:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] [...] Please, guys, don't have your discussion here. I don't think we really care about the differences between PaX

Re: A case study of a new user turned off debian

2003-11-06 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: | On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: | It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer | than about 2 years old. | | It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping

Re: Changes in t1lib.

2003-11-06 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Artur R. Czechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And last but not least: upstream name is t1lib. I do not like to change it until it is really needed. Fair enough; that's probably the best argument. (I similarly resisted renaming alsa-xmms to xmms-alsa because I felt it would be better to keep

Re: Looking for apt-get internals guide

2003-11-06 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Matt Zimmerman said: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 06:31:44PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:46:39PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: But, I don't see why you should need to hook into apt at all in order to do what you want. If the files you

Re: rename linux-kernel-headers to system-headers

2003-11-06 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:20:36 -0600 (CST), Adam Heath wrote: Sorry, users will still ask. They always ask. Users still think that updating /usr/include/linux to point to /usr/src/linux/include/linux is the right thing to do. And then, which package does provide /usr/src/linux directory?

Re: Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstreamproject

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Buck
Well, given you talk about being a pure GPL project, why not put your documentation under the GPL as well? Even if you were writing in plain text or in a WYSIWYG program, it's a reasonable choice. But given you're writing in docbook, with a very clear source-compiled-to-object mapping, the

Accepted mozilla-thunderbird 0.3-6 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Alexander Sack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:23:40 +0100 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Binary: mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alexander Sack [EMAIL

Accepted boson-base 0.9-1 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mickael Marchand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 23:41:29 + Source: boson-base Binary: boson boson-base Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mickael Marchand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mickael Marchand

Accepted boson-data 0.9-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mickael Marchand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:13:51 + Source: boson-data Binary: boson-data Architecture: source all Version: 0.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mickael Marchand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mickael Marchand [EMAIL

Accepted boson-music 0.9-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mickael Marchand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 01:18:46 + Source: boson-music Binary: boson-music Architecture: source all Version: 0.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mickael Marchand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mickael Marchand [EMAIL

Accepted openwebmail 2.20-4 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Sergio Rua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:44:13 + Source: openwebmail Binary: openwebmail Architecture: source all Version: 2.20-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sergio Rua [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sergio Rua [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl 0.24-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:40:13 +0100 Source: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl Binary: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.24-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof

Accepted brltty 3.3.1-6 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mario Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:18:43 +0100 Source: brltty Binary: brltty-udeb libbrlapi-dev libbrlapi brltty Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.3.1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mario Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted straw 0.20-2 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Ross Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:40:43 + Source: straw Binary: straw Architecture: source all Version: 0.20-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted mobilemesh 1.0-5 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:15:09 +1100 Source: mobilemesh Binary: mobilemesh Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted smstools 1.12.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Mark Purcell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:42:10 +1100 Source: smstools Binary: smstools Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.12.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted groff 1.18.1-13 (powerpc source)

2003-11-06 Thread Colin Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:52:18 + Source: groff Binary: groff-base groff Architecture: source powerpc Version: 1.18.1-13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Colin Watson [EMAIL

Accepted storebackup 1.14.1-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Arthur Korn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:00:22 +0100 Source: storebackup Binary: storebackup Architecture: source all Version: 1.14.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Arthur Korn [EMAIL

Accepted cupsys 1.1.19final-2 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Kenshi Muto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 18:31:02 +0900 Source: cupsys Binary: cupsys-bsd libcupsys2-dev libcupsys2 cupsys libcupsimage2-dev libcupsimage2 cupsys-client Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.19final-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low

Accepted libclass-methodmaker-perl 1.12-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Peter Palfrader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:16:57 +0100 Source: libclass-methodmaker-perl Binary: libclass-methodmaker-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libclass-methodmaker-perl 1.12-2 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Peter Palfrader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 14:41:42 +0100 Source: libclass-methodmaker-perl Binary: libclass-methodmaker-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.12-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted tilp 6.68-3 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:23:26 +0100 Source: tilp Binary: tilp Architecture: source i386 Version: 6.68-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl 0.24-2 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:38:20 +0100 Source: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl Binary: libmasonx-request-withapachesession-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.24-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Krzysztof

Accepted openssl096 0.9.6l-1 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Christoph Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:53:09 +0100 Source: openssl096 Binary: libssl0.9.6 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9.6l-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Christoph Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Christoph Martin

Accepted ayttm 0.4.4-1 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Halls
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:56:42 +0100 Source: ayttm Binary: ayttm Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Chris Halls [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted gcl 2.6.1-18 (i386 source all)

2003-11-06 Thread Camm Maguire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:40:25 + Source: gcl Binary: gcl-doc gcl Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.6.1-18 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted gclcvs 2.7.0-14 (i386 source all)

2003-11-06 Thread Camm Maguire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:43:07 + Source: gclcvs Binary: gclcvs gclcvs-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.7.0-14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Camm Maguire [EMAIL

Accepted webmin-extra 1.120-1 (i386 source all)

2003-11-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:19:07 + Source: webmin-extra Binary: webmin-sendmail webmin-bind webmin-grub webmin-xinetd webmin-shorewall webmin-lvm webmin-usermin webmin-firewall webmin-wuftpd webmin-fetchmail webmin-inetd webmin-lilo

Accepted libtext-chasen-perl 1.04-3 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:29:13 +0900 Source: libtext-chasen-perl Binary: libtext-chasen-perl Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.04-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NOKUBI Takatsugu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: NOKUBI

Accepted webmin-extra 1.110-1 (i386 source all)

2003-11-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 02:04:21 + Source: webmin-extra Binary: webmin-sendmail webmin-bind webmin-grub webmin-xinetd webmin-shorewall webmin-lvm webmin-usermin webmin-firewall webmin-wuftpd webmin-fetchmail webmin-inetd webmin-lilo

Accepted webmin-optional 1.120-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:52:25 + Source: webmin-optional Binary: webmin-squid webmin-stunnel webmin-sshd webmin-jabber webmin-samba webmin-dhcpd webmin-cfengine webmin-ldap-useradmin webmin-updown webmin-lpadmin webmin-adsl

Accepted webmin-optional 1.110-1 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:38:52 -0400 Source: webmin-optional Binary: webmin-squid webmin-stunnel webmin-sshd webmin-jabber webmin-samba webmin-dhcpd webmin-cfengine webmin-ldap-useradmin webmin-updown webmin-lpadmin webmin-adsl

Accepted chasen 2.3.3-3 (i386 source)

2003-11-06 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:29:27 +0900 Source: chasen Binary: libchasen-dev libchasen0 chasen chasen-dictutils Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.3.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NOKUBI Takatsugu [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted yada 0.25 (all source)

2003-11-06 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:32:04 +0100 Source: yada Binary: yada-doc yada Architecture: source all Version: 0.25 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL

  1   2   >