On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Hartmut Rummel wrote:
> This is cory yearwood from Exsis. Please can you remove the e-mail from your
> website..
And yet the name in your From: line is Hartmut Rummel, and you're using a
totally different e-mail address.
Either way, I doubt that post
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004, Russell Coker wrote:
> Now I don't have the time and interest needed to take this package further.
> I
> offer this first to Henrique if he wants it back. Otherwise it's available
> to anyone who has the time to continue development.
I like fcron, and I use it quite exten
remove me from callwave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:00:58AM -0800, Bao C. Ha wrote:
> Yes, I have been packaging my own qmailadmin. If it is OK, I will
> MMU that.
Well, see the developers reference on how to do a NMU, and go ahead
according to it.
On a sidenote, I guess it'd be a good idea to read the developers
referen
Hi,
I've just started http://wiki.debian.net/SoftwarePackaging, intended to
collect thoughts of packagers how upstream developers can make the life of
a packager easier.
I'm sure all packagers have wondered about "brain-dead" upstream developers
who have not put much thought into how their sof
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wwwstat
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Roy Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/websoft/wwwstat/
* License : Artistic
Description : httpd logfile analysis package
wwwstat proces
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: freemind
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Christian Foltin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://freemind.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A Java Program for creating and viewing Mindmaps
Hi,
the packa
Am Samstag, 15. Mai 2004 04:40 schrieb Timothy Demulder:
> I didn't find that in your mail, but all this is just IMHO.
> I'm absolutly no teacher btw, just another geek helping an elementary
> school.
Hi Timothy again,
how's your work proceeded, meanwhile?
Thanks again for your valuable comments,
Yes, I have been packaging my own qmailadmin. If it is OK, I will
MMU that.
Bao
On Mon, November 8, 2004 1:33 am, Jeroen van Wolffelaar said:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:39:54AM +0100, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote:
>> It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no
>> apparen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-wiki-perl
Version : 0.61
Upstream Author : Kake Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Wiki/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : A toolkit for building Wikis
Helps
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libdbix-fulltextsearch-perl
Version : 0.73
Upstream Author : T.J. Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-FullTextSearch/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : Indexing docu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openguides
Version : 0.43
Upstream Author : The OpenGuides Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://openguides.org/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
Description : A web application for managing a collaborativ
Hi.
By popular demand, I plan to move the PATH definition for root from
the default /root/.profile to the default /etc/profile. If anybody
knows a good reason why this should not be done before the release of
sarge, please say so. After an amount of time which is reasonale for a
"frozen" package l
I am willing to give up fcron if someone is interested in taking it over. I
have done everything I wanted to do with this package, I put SE Linux support
in it, I updated it to the latest upstream version, and I worked with
upstream to fix all the bugs that seemed significant to me.
Now I don'
Am Sonntag, 7. November 2004 15.32 schrieb Jaldhar H. Vyas:
Good morning
First of all. The further discussion for the porting work will be consolidated
on the debian-desktop lists only.
> > Abstract:
> > I search a person (or more than one) who is interested to port Yast2 from
> > Novell/SuSE t
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 03:39:54AM +0100, Christer Mjellem Strand wrote:
> It would seem this package needs to be orphaned. There has been no
> apparent work done on it since it's initial release over a year ago,
> even though there have been many upstream releases since then. New
> upstream versio
On Thu, 04.11.2004 at 00:15:19 +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand my ISP's rationale which is to reduce virus mails hitting
> ISP's mail server. I also understand that SPF will not be a bullet
> proof against mail forgery.
Please point your ISP to this interview (esp. pag
17 matches
Mail list logo
