Hi.
Josselin Mouette wrote:
As long as the linux26 installation ends up with both sound modules
loaded, that's a bug that needs to be fixed, though. Another option
would be to put the alsa modules in separate packages, just like pcmcia
modules.
That definetly sounds much better ;).
Kind regards
Tho
Hi.
Nick Welch wrote:
(not sure if i can post to this list, but what the hey)
Hey, thanks for joining the discussion.
It's the fair license, which is OSI approved:
http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php
Yet it seems that the BSD license's
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:59:12AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Describing how the code is small si sure some fun, but is this package
> really useful for something? As described, it sounds just like one more
> random window manager nobody cares for.
(I will some day learn to use "reply to li
[no cc thanks]
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 12:16:03AM -0600, Nick Welch wrote:
> > Thanks for pointing this out. Now we have a concrete example of just
> > how screwed up OSI is. That licence does not grant any permission to
> > modify, redistribute, or otherwise deal in the work in a Free manner.
>
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 07:59:11AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > That licence does not grant any permission to modify,
> > redistribute, or otherwise deal in the work in a Free manner. For it to be
> > judged as satisfying the Open Source Definition
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> That licence does not grant any permission to modify,
> redistribute, or otherwise deal in the work in a Free manner. For it to be
> judged as satisfying the Open Source Definition is ludicrous.
Are you an Laywer, is that based on research?
I mean, for
> Thanks for pointing this out. Now we have a concrete example of just
> how screwed up OSI is. That licence does not grant any permission to
> modify, redistribute, or otherwise deal in the work in a Free manner.
> For it to be judged as satisfying the Open Source Definition is
> ludicrous.
Int
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:38:49PM -0600, Nick Welch wrote:
> (not sure if i can post to this list, but what the hey)
>
> > That's not a free license. In fact, it's about as non-free as you can
> > get, since it's essentially "all rights reserved"; there's no
> > permission to modify or redistribu
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:07:16PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 01:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 ? 01:17 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a ?crit :
> > > TinyWM is a ridiculously tiny window manager implemented in nearly as
> > > few lines of C as pos
(not sure if i can post to this list, but what the hey)
> That's not a free license. In fact, it's about as non-free as you can
> get, since it's essentially "all rights reserved"; there's no
> permission to modify or redistribute at all. We can't distribute this,
> even in non-free.
>
> Here's th
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 00:48:21 +0100
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> We have plans to add support in popularity-contest to send the
> report through http POST. Both the server part an the client part have
> been developed. The last issue is to actually use it in th
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 01:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 à 01:17 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> > TinyWM is a ridiculously tiny window manager implemented in nearly as
> > few lines of C as possible, without being obfuscated or entirely
> > useless. It allows y
Henning Makholm wrote on 05/03/2005 12:17:
Scripsit Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just wondering if Debian should switch to LSB recommendation
LSB recommends:
0 halt
1 single user mode
2 multiuser with no network services exported
3 normal/full multiu
On Saturday 05 March 2005 06:48 pm, Bill Allombert wrote:
> For that purpose, I have made an experimental popularity-contest package
> that use both smtp and http. Please find it here:
Have you considered uploading it to experimental?
Daniel
--
/--- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PR
Hi,
At Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:59:27 +0100,
Frank Küster wrote:
> > Is this documented in the sbuild package, or somewhere else? For a
> > starter, I looked at Andreas Barth's cheat sheet, but there he only
> > mentions manual building of packages, no local queue.
>
> While I only read it back then,
Le dimanche 06 mars 2005 à 01:17 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> TinyWM is a ridiculously tiny window manager implemented in nearly as
> few lines of C as possible, without being obfuscated or entirely
> useless. It allows you to move, resize, focus (sloppy), and raise
> windows.
Describi
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 00:48 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> We have plans to add support in popularity-contest to send the
> report through http POST. Both the server part an the client part have
> been developed. The last issue is to actually use it in the cron job
> and see
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:17:50AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: tinywm
> Version : 1.2.0
> Upstream Author : Nick Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://inc
Hello developers,
We have plans to add support in popularity-contest to send the
report through http POST. Both the server part an the client part have
been developed. The last issue is to actually use it in the cron job
and see what issues
For that purpose, I have made an experimental populari
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:01:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 00:44 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > Exactly. I don't have alsa-base installed on any of my 2.6.x systems
> > and some of them have sound and some don't. None of them have
> > problems.
> > A de
Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Sunday 27 February 2005 à 10:08:02, Julien Danjou a écrit:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: wmail
> > Version : 2.0
> > Upstream Author : Sven Geisenhainer <[EMAIL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
URL: http://hacks.dlux.hu/maildirsync/
License: GPL/Artistic
Package: maildirsync
Description: Simple and efficient Maildir synchronisation utility
maildirsync is a utility for synchronising Maildir folders. It uses
its own custom protocol for efficient communic
also sprach Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1901 +0100]:
> Actually I don't really know, but maybe the environment-variable
> DISTCC_SSH could be helpful.
... it was really too early in the day. Sorry to all.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
Le Sunday 27 February 2005 à 10:08:02, Julien Danjou a écrit:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: wmail
> Version : 2.0
> Upstream Author : Sven Geisenhainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://dockapps.or
Hi,
a while ago I wrote:
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> in order to test whether packages that build-depend on tetex can still
>>> be built with the upcoming version 3.0, I would like to automatically
>>> build as many of these packages. I know where I can read a
* martin f. krafft:
> Has anyone else run into this problem? How could I work around it?
"unset LD_PRELOAD" and a wrapper script works with current fakeroot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1840 +0100]:
ssh -i usualy helps.
not if you cannot influence how SSH is called.
Actually I don't really know, but maybe the environment-variable
DISTCC_SSH could be helpful.
Regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1840 +0100]:
> ssh -i usualy helps.
not if you cannot influence how SSH is called.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian develope
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to use distcc to compile Debian packages and kernels,
> and am failing. The reason is that I need to use distcc-over-SSH,
> but the Debian compile process is run as (fake)root. Thus, it tries
> to use /root/.ssh for configuratio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tinywm
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Nick Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://incise.org/
* License : fair license
Description : Ridiculously tiny wind
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's rumours on debian-devel that NEW processing is actual on hold
> (by decision rather than by default) but that wasn't communicated. Of
> course it may be false
It is false.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/03/msg00019.html
Steve Halasz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've sent a few emails over the last month to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting that grass be removed from
> packages-arch-specific. But my pleas have fallen on deaf ears, or
> perhaps overzealous spam filters. Are you guys out there? Is there
> any
Hi,
I've sent a few emails over the last month to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting that grass be removed from
packages-arch-specific. But my pleas have fallen on deaf ears, or
perhaps overzealous spam filters. Are you guys out there? Is there
anyone else who can make this change
also sprach Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1225 +0100]:
> > I am trying to use distcc to compile Debian packages and kernels,
> > and am failing. The reason is that I need to use distcc-over-SSH,
> > but the Debian compile process is run as (fake)root.
>
> Why isn't it enough
Scripsit Benjamin Mesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just wondering if Debian should switch to LSB recommendation
> LSB recommends:
> 0 halt
> 1 single user mode
> 2 multiuser with no network services exported
> 3 normal/full multiuser
> 4 reserved for local use,
[martin f krafft]
> I am trying to use distcc to compile Debian packages and kernels,
> and am failing. The reason is that I need to use distcc-over-SSH,
> but the Debian compile process is run as (fake)root.
Why isn't it enough to do 'make install' as root? Is there something
in the build proces
Hi all,
I am trying to use distcc to compile Debian packages and kernels,
and am failing. The reason is that I need to use distcc-over-SSH,
but the Debian compile process is run as (fake)root. Thus, it tries
to use /root/.ssh for configuration and node verification, which is
not accessible to the
Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 00:44 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Exactly. I don't have alsa-base installed on any of my 2.6.x systems
> and some of them have sound and some don't. None of them have
> problems.
>
> A depends would be too strong. A recommends/suggests should be there.
I'm onl
==
(BVIRUS GUARD and CHECK SERVICE for E-Mail Powerd by SYMANTEC Scan Engine.
(B
$B$"$J$?$,Aw$C$?%a!<%k$K%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B8!CN$5$l$?%&[EMAIL PROTECTED];_$N0Y!"%a!<%k$r:o=|CW$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B%a!<%k$rAw?.$7$h$&[
39 matches
Mail list logo
