Bug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- clamassassin is a simple virus filter wrapper for camav for use in procmail filters and similar applications.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: clamassassin Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Author : James Lick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://drivel.com/clamassassin/ * License : http://drivel.com/clamassassin/clamassassi

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

Karl Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing something that involves building every Debian package, > and I'm finding (usually minor) discrepancies between what I build > from source packages, and the binary packages uploaded by > maintainers. I'm building each package in its own chr

Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments)

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:24:49AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22:08, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > (...) > > > AFAIK we don't have a good "What you can do to help us" documentation > > > (please

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:46:17AM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > Scribit Bas Zoetekouw dies 15/03/2005 hora 10:37: > > I find it a bit hard to believe that Debian isn't able to support 11 > > architectures while for example FreeBSD and NetBSD seem to manage > > fine. > > - FreeBSD: 6 ports, 12646

Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments)

* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050322 22:25]: > > AFAIK we don't have a good "What you can do to help us" documentation > > (please correct me, if I am wrong). > How about http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ ? > Which is linked from the main debian.org page (bottom left: "Help Debian") I think it

Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments)

HI, * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 11:10]: > < cc-ing to -doc, since most part of the mail is more relevant there > > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050318 18:59]: > > > [...] > > > I've been thinking of contributing to Debian for a long time since I > > > started > > >

Re: HOWTO Help (was: Debian DPL Debate Comments)

Hello Javier, * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-23 11:11]: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: [...] > > How about http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ ? > > Which is linked from the main debian.org page (bottom left: "Help Debian") > > That is p

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?

Steve Langasek wrote: >Hi Gunnar, > >On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:06:47PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > >>And I am sure we can find more examples like these - I have not really >>checked, but I would be surprised if architectures as popular as >>Sparc, Alpha or ARM wouldn't have an emulator (although p

Re: Bug#300996: ITP: clamassassin -- simple wrapper for clamav

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Nick Price wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: clamassassin > Version : 1.2.2 > Upstream Author : James Lick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://drivel.com/clamassassin/ > *

Re: Documentation is/is not software [was: NEW ...]

Matthew Palmer wrote: >On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:32:30PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:06:19AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote: >> >>>And I believe that the Vancouver proposal, if implemented as intended >>>up to now, will not only affect what Debian really *is*, but in s

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Scribit Bas Zoetekouw dies 15/03/2005 hora 10:37: > > I find it a bit hard to believe that Debian isn't able to support 11 > > architectures while for example FreeBSD and NetBSD seem to manage > > fine. > > - FreeBSD: 6 ports, 12646 packages > - Debian: 11 por

Found an http SourceForge archive mirror

Hi, For who cares.. I've noticed that my old sf ftp mirror [0] is down/broken/unmaintained. After googling a bit I found a new one: http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/ Thus a debian/watch like: version=2 http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/a/al/alsamodular/ams-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 debian uupdate is working for my

Re: Found an http SourceForge archive mirror

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:24:21AM +0100, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > For who cares.. > > I've noticed that my old sf ftp mirror [0] is down/broken/unmaintained. > > After googling a bit I found a new one: > > http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/ > > Thus a debian/watch like: > > version=2 > http://sf.gds.

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?

Hi, On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 08:06:47PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > safe - Yes, I know we cannot run Debian on a regular UAE because of > the lack of a MMU in the official package, but we _can_ run it inside > Basilisk2. I was wondering how you are supposed to run Debian inside official BasiliskII

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

Pierre THIERRY wrote: - Debian: 11 ports, 9157 packages (sarge) [17593 in sid] Hrm, where are those numbers from? I get: Unique binary packages in woody/i386: 8974 Unique binary packages in woody/*: 9133 Unique binary packages in sarge/i386: 15243 Unique binary packages in sarge/*:15540 Un

Bug#301041: apt-cache: dependency graph for build dependencies

Package: apt Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: wishlist "dotty" command of apt-cache is really useful, but works only for binary packages. I had the need of generating graphs of build dependencies in order to decide the proper order of uploading packages to avoid autobuilder fails for unmet build depend

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:46:17AM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote: > - Debian: 11 ports, 9157 packages (sarge) [17593 in sid] > - NetBSD: 55 ports, 5300 packages It should be noted that the definition of 'port' isn't necessarily the same if you compare NetBSD against Debian; for instance, NetBSD/mac6

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:24:41PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > The Vancouver meeting summary upset me, not because of the proposals > to drop architectures, but because it contained a reminder of the > Social Contract changes. The project is moving to what I believe to > be a ridiculously extre

Re: querying available package versions over the net

On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 18:04:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Why not create your own apt/lists and apt/cache directory, run apt-get > update and then apt-cache on the same? The debget package description > says it "doesn't require a local copy of the Packages files", may

Re: Bug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Composer engine

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: nvu > Version : 0.90 > Upstream Author : Linspire, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : htt

Re: Bug#300993: ITP: nvu -- Nvu is a complete Web Authoring System based on the Mozilla Composer engine

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:26:53PM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:09:48PM -0600, Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Nick Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > * Package name: nvu > > Versio

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:58:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Gunnar, > > I quite agree with Anthony that if we have to emulate the machine, there's > not much sense in supporting it. I disagree: porters should be free to use whatever tools they want to do the job. What is important is whe

Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: mutt-ng Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description : Mutt n

Bug#301083: ITP: libevolution-ruby -- revolution, ruby binding for the evolution mail client

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libevolution-ruby Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Tom Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://revolution.rubyforge.org/ * License : BSD Description : revolu

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

> On 2005-03-23 01:17 PST, Frank KÃster writes: fant> What do you do to look at the differences? I'm just doing a diff between the list of files produced (the thing I'm doing changes compiled output files anyway) - so timestamps shouldn't affect anything. Some of them just produce differ

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

> On 2005-03-22 20:13 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: Jeroen> I think it'd be good to ship sarge without such Jeroen> situations, but again, this needs to be looked into on Jeroen> a case-by-case basis, and I certainly dare not say Jeroen> that every such case must be a bug

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:24:34AM -0800, Karl Chen wrote: > > On 2005-03-23 01:17 PST, Frank K??ster writes: > > fant> What do you do to look at the differences? > > I'm just doing a diff between the list of files produced (the > thing I'm doing changes compiled output files anyway) - so

Bug#301061: ITP: apt-rpm -- tools to create APT RPM repository

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: apt-rpm Version : 0.5.15cnc6 Upstream Author : Gustavo Niemeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfredo K. Kojima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> based on work by the Debian

Re: debian development diagram: major rework!

Le dimanche 20 mars 2005 Ã 08:48 -0500, Kevin Mark a Ãcrit : > Hi all you folks who have exercised your fingers and eyes because of > 'vancouvor', > In my quest to see how things work, I have made some major revision to > my diagram. > http://debian.home.pipeline.com/ > the new diagram is newdebian

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:30:51AM -0800, Karl Chen wrote: > > On 2005-03-22 20:13 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > Jeroen> I think it'd be good to ship sarge without such > Jeroen> situations, but again, this needs to be looked into on > Jeroen> a case-by-case basis, and I c

NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

Hello. Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days I can say it's not true anymore. So could someone explain what are the criterions now? regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[E

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

On 10237 March 1977, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. > After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days > I can say it's not true anymore. > So could someone explain what are the criterions now?

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some package. > > After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing lists last days > > I can say it's not true anymore. > > > So could someone explain what are th

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

Elimar Riesebieter: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: mutt-ng Also note that Norbert Tretkowski has already created a mutt-ng package, although he doesn't intend to upload it (yet). It is available at

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:35:35PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Version : x.y.z > Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.example.org/ > * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Didn't feel the need to fill those in? -- Petri Latva

Re: *** SPAM *** Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels (Was: Re: NEW handling ...)

On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being > supported by Debian assets, such that the FSF documentation were no > longer available, I'd probably end up agreeing with you and probably > would do wh

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:29:35AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being > > supported by Debian assets, such that the FSF documentation were no > > longer avai

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:26:43PM -0800, Karl Chen wrote: > > On 2005-03-23 11:44 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: > > Jeroen> I assume you use 'debdiff' that actually does those > Jeroen> list you the differences in file lists? And also > Jeroen> differences in dependencies, if

Bug#301142: ITP: libgraphviz-perl -- Perl interface to the GraphViz graphing tool

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libgraphviz-perl Version : 2.02 Upstream Author : Leon Brocard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/ * License : Dual GPL/Artistic Descri

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

> On 2005-03-23 16:33 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: >> I didn't know about debdiff - that would have saved me from >> basically re-implementing it. Jeroen> Common problem unfortunately in the open source/Debian Jeroen> world... not that $what_you_want doesn't exist, but

Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master

On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:33 pm, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some > > > package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing > > > lists last days

Re: Bug#299783: ITP: python-enchant -- A spellchecking library forPython

Hi All, I stumbled across this in the debian list archives and through I should clarify, as the author of the software in question. On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:50:18 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 22:05 +0900, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owne

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

> On 2005-03-23 11:44 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: Jeroen> I assume you use 'debdiff' that actually does those Jeroen> list you the differences in file lists? And also Jeroen> differences in dependencies, if a recompile introduces Jeroen> another dependency, it is worth f

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > Elimar Riesebieter: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: mutt-ng > Also note that Norbert Tretkowski has already created a mutt-ng > package, although he d

Re: Vancouver meeting - clarifications

Scribit Anthony Towns dies 23/03/2005 hora 21:52: > Pierre THIERRY wrote: > >- Debian: 11 ports, 9157 packages (sarge) [17593 in sid] > Hrm, where are those numbers from? wc -l (modulo the first lines) of the allpackages.txt file on the website Quickly, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0

Debian-Installer rc3 released

The Debian Installer team is proud to announce the third release candidate of the Debian Installer for Debian GNU/Linux Sarge. We love doing this so much that we couldn't resist updating the installer one more time before the official release of Debian 3.1. The most significant change in this rele

wxWidgets 2.5 [Was Re: NEW-queue handling after extending group of ftp-master]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:43:17PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote: > > Believe me I'm trying to investigate and fix #295131. Btw any ideas/help > > are welcome. Second RC bug for scorched3d is fixed both in upstream and > > on my box, but without fixing first one there's no need to upload. > > Once aga

Re: Debian-Installer rc3 released

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:53:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > The Debian Installer team is proud to announce the third release candidate > of the Debian Installer for Debian GNU/Linux Sarge. We love doing this so > much that we couldn't resist updating the installer one more time before > the offici

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool > (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (vanilla) Mutt can use it > fine. Same problem here. Reported to Nor

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:13:05 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:29:35AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: >> On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being >> > s