This is an auto-reply from Dark Age of Camelot support. Please do not reply to
this e-mail.
Your account transfer e-mail must have a valid account ID as the subject.
DAoC Customer Support
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Thank you for contacting Dark Age of Camelot Support. Your email has been
received and
you should expect a response from the Technical Team within 72 hours. Please
be sure to
have any e-mail spam filters properly configured to allow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
through (so that further responses are no
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:19:38AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > > This is the last issue I know of keeping this package out of the Debian
> > > archives. Yay! There's still the manpage issue, but I expect it will
> > > be resolved upstream in the next few days.
> >
> > Any chance you ca
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:07:36AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:30:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Completely MIA maintainers are one part of the problem.
> >
> > But then there's the class of maintainers who manage to upload a new
> > upstream version and perhaps fix some
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > >>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel, why
> > >>not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Grzegorz Bizon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: dguitar
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Mauricio Gracia Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dguitar.sourceforge.net/
* Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libkbanking
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Martin Preuss<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/aqbanking/
* License : GPL
Description : KDE bi
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> It does, if you use the authorization checks in PAM. If
Steve> you only use the authentication checks, then PAM is only
Steve> going to authenticate the user -- not check whether they're
Steve> allowed access.
Whe
> "Bernd" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> I think it is a good idea. Even if we dont move to a web
Bernd> based system there is no harm to support us web browser
Bernd> users a bit :)
Bernd> And consider especially the end-user.
Also consider forwarding
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve> It does, if you use the authorization checks in PAM. If
> Steve> you only use the authentication checks, then PAM is only
> Steve> going to authenticate th
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:49:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > > >>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel,
Hello,
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote:
> The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it.
> (X25 Compiled problem).
It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I
think this is correct, since it compiles with recent GCC.
Brian May wrote:
>>"Bernd" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Bernd> I think it is a good idea. Even if we dont move to a web
> Bernd> based system there is no harm to support us web browser
> Bernd> users a bit :)
>
> Bernd> And consider especially the end-
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote:
>> The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it.
>> (X25 Compiled problem).
> It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I
> thin
This is an automated response.
Thank you for contacting RedEnvelope Customer Service. We will respond
to your inquiry within one business day. If you have an urgent Customer
Service issue, please call us toll-free at 1-877-733-3683.
We look forward to responding to your email.
Regards,
RedE
Hello Russ,
thanks for your help!!!
Ok, I could inline the definition and be happy or go with the sarge version.
In the past i tried to do nasty ifdef tricks to be portable, but I found
out that inlining those declarations is easier and more robust. In case of
networking the layout cant change,
16 matches
Mail list logo