Dark Age of Camelot Support Autoresponse

2005-05-15 Thread Dark Age of Camelot Support Autoresponse
This is an auto-reply from Dark Age of Camelot support. Please do not reply to this e-mail. Your account transfer e-mail must have a valid account ID as the subject. DAoC Customer Support -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Re: Auslaenderpolitik

2005-05-15 Thread Dark Age of Camelot Customer Support
Thank you for contacting Dark Age of Camelot Support. Your email has been received and you should expect a response from the Technical Team within 72 hours. Please be sure to have any e-mail spam filters properly configured to allow [EMAIL PROTECTED] through (so that further responses are no

Re: new cogito package, OpenSSL license issue resolved

2005-05-15 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:19:38AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > > > This is the last issue I know of keeping this package out of the Debian > > > archives. Yay! There's still the manpage issue, but I expect it will > > > be resolved upstream in the next few days. > > > > Any chance you ca

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:07:36AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2005 12:30:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Completely MIA maintainers are one part of the problem. > > > > But then there's the class of maintainers who manage to upload a new > > upstream version and perhaps fix some

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > > Steve Langasek schrieb: > > >>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel, why > > >>not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other b

Bug#309241: ITP: dguitar -- Guitar Pro 3/4 tabs viewer and player

2005-05-15 Thread Grzegorz Bizon
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Grzegorz Bizon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: dguitar Version : 0.4.2 Upstream Author : Mauricio Gracia Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://dguitar.sourceforge.net/ * Li

Bug#309237: ITP: libkbanking -- KDE bindings for AqBanking

2005-05-15 Thread Mark Purcell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libkbanking Version : 0.9.9 Upstream Author : Martin Preuss<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/aqbanking/ * License : GPL Description : KDE bi

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-15 Thread Brian May
> "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> It does, if you use the authorization checks in PAM. If Steve> you only use the authentication checks, then PAM is only Steve> going to authenticate the user -- not check whether they're Steve> allowed access. Whe

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-15 Thread Brian May
> "Bernd" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bernd> I think it is a good idea. Even if we dont move to a web Bernd> based system there is no harm to support us web browser Bernd> users a bit :) Bernd> And consider especially the end-user. Also consider forwarding

Re: adduser: what is the difference between --disabled-password and--disabled-login

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve> It does, if you use the authorization checks in PAM. If > Steve> you only use the authentication checks, then PAM is only > Steve> going to authenticate th

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:49:10PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:10:10AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > > > Steve Langasek schrieb: > > > >>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel,

need help on #271678 (sizefo struct?)

2005-05-15 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote: > The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it. > (X25 Compiled problem). It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I think this is correct, since it compiles with recent GCC.

Re: Against which package should this go?

2005-05-15 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Brian May wrote: >>"Bernd" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Bernd> I think it is a good idea. Even if we dont move to a web > Bernd> based system there is no harm to support us web browser > Bernd> users a bit :) > > Bernd> And consider especially the end-

Re: need help on #271678 (sizefo struct?)

2005-05-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 06:36:21PM +0200, Cesare Tensi wrote: >> The bugs #271678 (also #302181) is fixed in -10, so you can close it. >> (X25 Compiled problem). > It is not fixed, the code still reads sizeof(struct x25_address) and I > thin

Re: ***SPAM*** Tuerkei in die EU - 1B9665EBA451

2005-05-15 Thread orders
This is an automated response. Thank you for contacting RedEnvelope Customer Service. We will respond to your inquiry within one business day. If you have an urgent Customer Service issue, please call us toll-free at 1-877-733-3683. We look forward to responding to your email. Regards, RedE

Re: Bug#302181: need help on #271678 (sizefo struct?)

2005-05-15 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello Russ, thanks for your help!!! Ok, I could inline the definition and be happy or go with the sarge version. In the past i tried to do nasty ifdef tricks to be portable, but I found out that inlining those declarations is easier and more robust. In case of networking the layout cant change,