On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:19:14PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Many people consider all of options a), b), and c) to be
Steve inappropriate, and will instead encrypt each of the uid
Steve signatures individually and mail them to
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The excuses pages are showing that my vncsnapshot package is being held
back for two reasons. First, it is only 4 of 10 days old, which is
acceptable. Second, because it depends on gcc-4.0, which has RC bugs.
However, I haven't specificed such a
On 6/18/05, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Practically speaking, the differences in compatibility between Ubuntu and
Debian is of as much concern as those between Debian stable and Debian
unstable. New interfaces are added in unstable constantly, and software is
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:33:06PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Except unstable is capable of running packages built on stable
Trivial packages which only link against libc, yes. In general, no. And
many packages from unstable won't build correctly (or at all) on stable
during most of the release
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
think it were critical that i do so...
http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
say it isn't so!
It isn't so. It's true that the design of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin-Eric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: gaim-irchelper
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Richard Laager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 00:34 +0200, Marco d'Itri a crit :
Just to make clear: this requirement of yours is one you have
invented.
Me and a large part of the Internet.
(Hint: RFCs are not the word of $GOD, but something which sites agree
about to help interoperability.)
How about all
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:22:35PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 6/18/05, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Practically speaking, the differences in compatibility between Ubuntu and
Debian is of as much concern as those between Debian stable and Debian
On 6/19/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of 596 lib packages in woody (loosely identified), 325 are still
present in sarge. That's after three years of more or less constant
development. Where did you come up with this absurd idea that all binary
packages of any great complexity
Hi,
Frank Lichtenheld and others have brought up the idea of automatically
testing installation, upgrading, and removal of packages. It struck me
that it should be pretty simple to implement at least basic versions of
this. The result: http://liw.iki.fi/liw/download/piuparts-0.4.tar.gz
I
Quoting BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bug stamp-out list for Jun 17 06:06 (CST)
Package: netsaint-plugins (non-US/main)
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
305479 [ + ] netsaint-plugins: check_log plugin breaks system
I thought I requested for this package(s) to be
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 03:19:14PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this process correct? Or did something go seriously wrong
here? If it was correct, why was it correct? If it was wrong,
why was it wrong?
For anyone who didn't
su, 2005-06-19 kello 11:28 +0200, Turbo Fredriksson kirjoitti:
Package: roxen3 (debian/main)
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
298934 [] [X] roxen3: contains non-free fonts
In one of Debian's lists (have no idea which), I/we discussed this. It was
YEARS ago.
la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in turn,
upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then looks for
/usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that is were produced during the package's
install or upgrade and not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gifshuffle
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Matthew Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : Public domain
Description : GIF colourmap
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 11:28:17AM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
Quoting BugScan reporter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bug stamp-out list for Jun 17 06:06 (CST)
Package: netsaint-plugins (non-US/main)
Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
305479 [ + ] netsaint-plugins:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:17:43AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The excuses pages are showing that my vncsnapshot package is being held
back for two reasons. First, it is only 4 of 10 days old, which is
acceptable. Second, because it depends on
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:27PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Adam Majer dijo [Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:15:00PM -0500]:
- Change boot system, to one capable of handling dependencies and
parallell invocation, to speed up the boot process.
Err.. Why? The current slow bootup is
lars == Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
lars la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti:
I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in
turn, upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then
looks for /usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that
[Joey Hess]
I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in turn,
upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then looks for
/usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that is were produced during the
package's install or upgrade and not removed.
I made a script to test upgrades from
[Adam Majer]
That could save a grand total of about a second. Also, during
startup the bottleneck is the hard drive in many cases so starting
concurrently might not speed up your boot process significantly.
Do you have any good references document this fact? I've seen
articles documenting a
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:16:28PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adam Majer]
That could save a grand total of about a second. Also, during
startup the bottleneck is the hard drive in many cases so starting
concurrently might not speed up your boot process significantly.
Do you have
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
No, Debian packages just work, if dpkg allows you to install them on
your system.
Unless, now, they happen to be built by someone running the other
distribution.
I can think of several ways that this could happen, but I haven't
actually seen any of them
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
I disagree, but again, I don't see your point
I think this sums up your entire response nicely, which is why I won't
reply to it point-by-point. You're not interested in trying to
understand these concerns, but you dismiss them out of hand. Fine.
--
see shy jo
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:35 -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
Debian packages just work has been a truism for *years*, and it's been
one of our key technical selling points. I don't want to see that fall
by the wayside. This thread is a perfect example of what will happen
if we don't worry about this
Adam Majer writes:
The biggest problem is debugging. Sure, you can fork and start all of the
processes concurrently, but what about if the start fails?
Then you restart with --serial.
You also want to have some processes started before others so you need
asynchronous instead of synchronous
Scott James Remnant wrote:
Walking up to a man on the street, if anything, you'll find Debian has
a far worse reputation than RPM and RedHat-derived distributions. The
general feeling is that third-party RPMs will almost always install on
any system, while third-party .debs are practically
Hi,
Frans Pop wrote:
I think blocking mails based on an address being dynamic/static sucks.
Indeed, but the only systems that send out email from dynamic IP
addresses are spam zombies (90%[1]) and people who run their own MTA,
which again are divided into clueless idiots running an open relay
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is simply no point in running a mail server on a dynamic IP. It
will not be able to accept mail in a reliable way, even with dyndns, so
you need some other host to accept and forward your mail to you anyway,
so you can as well route it through a
On Sunday 19 June 2005 17:48, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Frans Pop wrote:
I think blocking mails based on an address being dynamic/static
sucks.
Indeed, but the only systems that send out email from dynamic IP
addresses are spam zombies (90%[1]) and people who run their own MTA,
You are
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 11:42 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Scott James Remnant wrote:
Walking up to a man on the street, if anything, you'll find Debian has
a far worse reputation than RPM and RedHat-derived distributions. The
general feeling is that third-party RPMs will almost always install
Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers:
- toolchain transition
- xorg
- sorting out docs-in-main vs. the DFSG
- SCC; amd64 as an official arch
So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer |
Le Dim 19 Juin 2005 18:14, Frans Pop a crit :
On Sunday 19 June 2005 17:48, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Frans Pop wrote:
I think blocking mails based on an address being dynamic/static
sucks.
Indeed, but the only systems that send out email from dynamic IP
addresses are spam
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:27]:
Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers:
- toolchain transition
- xorg
- sorting out docs-in-main vs. the DFSG
- SCC; amd64 as an official arch
So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
I hope you remember well that SCC=ports.d.o
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:32]:
aurelien == Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aurelien Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers: - toolchain transition - xorg - sorting out
docs-in-main vs. the DFSG - SCC; amd64 as an official arch
aurelien
aurelien == Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
aurelien Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers: - toolchain transition - xorg - sorting out
docs-in-main vs. the DFSG - SCC; amd64 as an official arch
aurelien So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
I think
prison
http://pcypcvyferfwa.ghjwatch.com/b3
Mildred
Hi,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
There is simply no point in running a mail server on a dynamic IP.
Would you define dynamic IP for me, just so I can be sure I know
what you're talking about?
It sounds here as if you mean an IP address which changes with some
frequency. Is that right?
Yes,
On 6/19/05, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's use a popular example... I make a package that
requires /usr/bin/bzgrep.
In Debian, I would have to read the debian/changelog for bzip2 and
discover that this wasn't introduced until 1.0.1-3, and thus
Depends: bzip2 (=
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 18:39 +0200, Simon Richter a crit :
OTOH, I think greylisting can help here, by applying it to hosts that
are listed as being dynamic. If the technology your ISP uses to connect
you to the internet is so strikingly similar to the technology used by
people who don't
On Sunday 19 June 2005 18:39, Simon Richter wrote:
Hrm, that would indeed be a reason to accept mail from some IPs inside
such dynamic blocks. Your IP does not seem to be listed as being
dynamic, though. :-)
Try mine: 195.240.184.66
And yes, it is static and not dynamic but unlikely to change
Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 19:11 +0200, Frans Pop a crit :
If I am blocked by something like SORBS when answering installation
reports or something like that, I will sometimes resend a mail through my
ISP, sometimes I just say @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ you, if you don't want to
receive my
mail,
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 11:35 -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
Debian packages just work has been a truism for *years*, and it's
been one of our key technical selling points. I don't want to see that
fall by the wayside. This thread is a perfect example of
andreas == Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
andreas * Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 18:32]:
aurelien == Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
aurelien Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers: - toolchain transition - xorg - sorting
out
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The main problem they had was that they created the debs for potato, and
they were perfectly installable on that. But Debian changed things
hugely in unstable, so they weren't installable there -- and then
introduced testing, making three
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Over the last week or so, after wanting features that dchroot didn't
provide, I've written a replacement: schroot. This is mostly
command-line compatible with dchroot, but provides additional
functionality, such as su/sudo-like behaviour:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
I can think of several ways that this could happen, but I haven't
actually seen any of them yet. Would you mind adducing some examples?
I haven't bothered to find them, but given what I'm hearing about
grimm
http://gvozclisgcz.ghjwatch.com/b3
Rosanne
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, even if said frequency is very low. If my ISP does not give me a
guarantee that when I reconnect I will get the same address again, and
that noone else is going to use that address, I consider it a dynamic IP.
If so, lots of ISPs (mine, for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: dklibs
Version : 1.7.5
Upstream Author : Dirk Krause
* URL : http://dklibs.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Description : dirk krause's libraries
The following
Hello,
Thank you for expressing interest in Rolex Replica watches.
This opportunity to offer you our fine selection
of Italian/Swiss crafted Rolex Timepieces.
You can view our large selection of Rolexes
(including Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier etc)
You are guaranteed of lowest prices and
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:20:49 -0500, Adam Majer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That could save a grand total of about a second.
It will save time in case of error when the bootup process stalls for
timeouts like DNS and NTP.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy
(also see http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianInstallerMeetings)
The fourth Debian Installer team meeting was held from 14:00UTC to 15:37UTC
on Saturday June 18th.
This was the first D-I team meeting since we had a pre-release meeting
at the end of July 2004, before releasing sarge Debian Installer
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 03:13:27PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Choosing not to use greylisting because it causes mail to become
non-realtime is *not* a valid complaint. Which is the point I was
trying to make in a roundabout fashion.
Hi,
Thanks to prompt action by the ftp-masters, the recently released slang2
is now in the archive. This mail is a request for maintainers of
packages that use slang1 to recompile and test their packages against
slang2; I intend to file patches against such packages over the next few
days,
cigar
http://whywaitlonger.com/cams3.php?SEVY
Helene
* Marc Haber:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:20:49 -0500, Adam Majer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That could save a grand total of about a second.
It will save time in case of error when the bootup process stalls for
timeouts like DNS and NTP.
You should set the clock using NTP *before* starting any
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Barth a crit :
release blockers:
- toolchain transition
- xorg
- sorting out docs-in-main vs. the DFSG
- SCC; amd64 as an official arch
So SCC is now a fact, not a proposal anymore?
SCC as in forcing primary mirrors to carry only selective
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:04:24PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:16:28PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adam Majer]
That could save a grand total of about a second. Also, during
startup the bottleneck is the hard drive in many cases so starting
concurrently
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld and others have brought up the idea of automatically
testing installation, upgrading, and removal of packages. It struck me
that it should be pretty simple to implement at least basic versions of
this. The result:
Having problems in bed? We can help!
http://presenting.powerinfoonline.info/?tightenxtvuypistolszsvsmokers
He that boasts of his own knowledge proclaims his ignorance
Hell, there are no rules here-- we're trying to accomplish something.
Spring makes everything look filthy.
Change
* Michael K. Edwards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 6/17/05, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Exactly. If Debian doesn't need such an arrangement, neither do our
users.
And if our users don't need such an arrangement, our accepting it does
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Using lvm is the fastest way to do this. Alternatives are to copy or
untar a clean chroot for every test. But that needs more time.
You can also use a loopback file and make a copy of it. Or use UML.
Gruss
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:41:47AM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
On 6/19/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of 596 lib packages in woody (loosely identified), 325 are still
present in sarge. That's after three years of more or less constant
development. Where did you come up
On Jun 19, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The amount of needed effort depends however whether the sarge installer
is stuck with the 2.6.8 kernel or not. Strict application of the
current stable release management rules mandate this, but there's a
general feeling among the team
Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 19/06/05, Ivo Timmermans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm orphaning these packages:
dvorak7min (bug #314844)
I have interest in this, I really liked using this program
Please do. I always wanted to use this excessively for a while and
finaly
* Marc Haber [Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:13:45 +0200]:
as we all know, Planet Debian generates RSS feeds that Akregator
doesn't grok, and both packages point at the other one for being at
fault.
Mako fixed this today. Thanks!
--
Adeodato Sim
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
On 6/19/05, Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Michael K. Edwards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I wouldn't say accept it, I would say acknowledge the safety zone
offered unilaterally by the Mozilla Foundation, and as a courtesy to
them make some effort to stay comfortably within it while
On 6/19/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 01:41:47AM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
The examples that come to mind immediately are those with substantial
components in both native code and an interpreted or bytecode
language, such as Perl XSUBs and Python
CC'ing this to correct bug number.
Ivo (from offlist email), yeah, if you read my update to that bug # i
said i posted it to the wrong one. (i actually reposted to
314844-quiet). I'm also going to have a big think about that other
package too.
On 20/06/05, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Eric Dorland writes:
If we don't need the arrangement, why exactly would we accept it
anyway?
Because they want it and it costs us nothing to give it to them. They are
our friends. Let's accommodate them where we can.
We may be their friends,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 23:22:01 +0200, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
* Marc Haber:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:20:49 -0500, Adam Majer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That could save a grand total of about a second.
It will save time in case of error when the bootup process stalls for
timeouts
Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
So my IP address, which my ISP promises will always be the same, and
is initialized by DHCP, is static. But most of the IP addresses in
the block are handed out dynamically. How will you be able to tell?
Not reliably,
Hi,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
So my IP address, which my ISP promises will always be the same, and
is initialized by DHCP, is static. But most of the IP addresses in
the block are handed out dynamically. How will you be able to tell?
Not reliably, that is sure, but the DUL has been pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:03:22 +0200
Source: libapreq2
Binary: libapache2-request-perl libapreq2-doc libapreq2 libapreq2-dev
Architecture: all i386 source
Version: 2.05-dev-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steinar H.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:45:07 +0100
Source: xfce-mcs-plugins
Binary: xfce4-mcs-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:14:22 +0200
Source: slrn
Binary: slrn slrnpull
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.8.1pl1-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Norbert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:41:08 +0200
Source: devmapper
Binary: dmsetup libdevmapper-dev libdevmapper1.01-udeb dmsetup-udeb
libdevmapper1.01
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:1.01.03-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:20:12 +0200
Source: python2.3
Binary: python2.3-doc idle-python2.3 python2.3-dev python2.3-examples
python2.3-mpz python2.3 python2.3-gdbm python2.3-tk python2.3-dbg
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.3.5-6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:48:26 +0100
Source: klogic
Binary: klogic
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.62-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:38:17 +
Source: dropbear
Binary: dropbear
Architecture: source ia64
Version: 0.45-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:18:03 +0100
Source: ikvm
Binary: ikvm libikvm-native
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.14.0.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dave Beckett [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:05:37 +0300
Source: qemu
Binary: qemu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QEMU Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2005 14:34:36 +1200
Source: html2ps
Binary: html2ps
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0b4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:25:48 +0200
Source: libgstreamer-perl
Binary: libgstreamer-perl
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.02-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 17:51:30 +0200
Source: xfce4-netload-plugin
Binary: xfce4-netload-plugin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:38:25 +0200
Source: zaptel
Binary: libtonezone1 zaptel-source zaptel libtonezone-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:1.0.7-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 11:44:30 +
Source: libapache-gallery-perl
Binary: libapache-gallery-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.99-svn050524-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:11:35 +0300
Source: ulogd
Binary: ulogd-pgsql ulogd-mysql ulogd ulogd-sqlite3 ulogd-pcap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.23-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Achilleas Kotsis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:24:08 +0200
Source: java-gcj-compat
Binary: java-gcj-compat
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.28-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:01:06 +0200
Source: xtla
Binary: xtla
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:31:37 -0700
Source: svn-arch-mirror
Binary: svn-arch-mirror
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Eric Wong [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:04:53 -0400
Source: gimp-help
Binary: gimp-help-zh-cn gimp-help-nl gimp-help-fr gimp-help-de gimp-help-it
gimp-help-common gimp-help-sv gimp-help-cs gimp-help-en
Architecture: source all
Version: 2+0.8-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:53:26 +0100
Source: libccscript
Binary: libccscript-dev libccscript2-0.5-3
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.5.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:09:09 +0100
Source: crack-attack
Binary: crack-attack
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.14-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Boyle [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:03:46 +0100
Source: libccaudio
Binary: libccaudio-dev libccaudio1-1.1-0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Purcell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Mark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:06:42 -0300
Source: trac
Binary: trac
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: critical
Maintainer: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:11:52 +0100
Source: xmms-arts
Binary: xmms-arts
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chris Boyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:25:12 -0400
Source: stl-manual
Binary: stl-manual
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.30-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francois Marier [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:21:30 +1200
Source: razor
Binary: razor
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.710-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Corrin Lakeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Corrin Lakeland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
