On Friday 13 January 2006 07:51, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > - Identify important games that are not packaged yet and package them.
>
> cube
cube is non-free or even non-distributable
Best regards
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 169 (new: 5)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 96 (new: 3)
Total number of packages requeste
On 1/13/06, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> We've been recently talking about creating a group to maintain games in Debian
> in a collaborative way. As a starting point, I've created a mailing list in
> alioth for coordination, and also for create discussion threads about th
Please read my first couple of lines in the email - as quoted below
>>Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole -
>>thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded
>>view.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> OK. Since you selected my post to reply to -- are
Hi,
I'm going to be requesting removals for packages I no longer need or
have the hardware to test (and was also upstream for); speak up within
the next week if you want them.
ddrmat-source: I believe this driver was merged into the kernel early in
the 2.6 series; it's also for pretty obsolete ha
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:47:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote :
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:48:38PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > But if you read this bug (#307833), you'd see that the maintainer doesn't
> > > consider it a bug, and has documented why in the README file.
> > It is a bug as the pac
Dear Gurus,
Since I got no response in -mentors I decided to bother the higher
authorities. I am sorry if I have produced an excess of noise.
I am a sponsored maintainer of mozilla-imagezoom package. I just
upgraded it to the most recent upstream version so I could have it
working with the recen
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:11:58PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the
> > threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that,
> > I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packag
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:15:25PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On the other hand I can not really
> believe that it is impossible to touch glibc and dpkg bugs with some
> kind of status ("I'm working on it", "Help would be welcome in this
> particular task", ...).
I don't think it's impossible,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:08:52PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> We can't decide how they need to "give us something MORE back" and
> it's their problem?
Whoever said they need to do that? They just need to stop bragging
about shit they don't do. There's at least two ways to accomplish this.
If
Chao, Toi muon dat 1 ve khu hoi di tu HN-TPHCM va nguoc lai tu ngay 18/01 va chieu nguoc lai khoang ngay 07 hoac 08/02 Cho hoi gia ve la bao nhieu?co khuyen mai ko? So dt cua toi:0918208490. chao than ai.
Yahoo! Photos
Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:17:48PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Yes, 'm68k' and 'future' in one sentence. Amazing, isn't it? Surely we
> must be joking?
Hey, I haven't seen any activity wrt m68k archive (re)qualificiation.
Given m68k's dropped back below the 95% cutoff (and has spent about
1/3
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:05:31PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think that the RC bug metric is overated and doesn't consider these
> kinds of effects that end up pulling down the overall usability of
> Debian.
Yeah, the RC bug metric is meant to just be for the trivial bugs that
we get rid of imme
Hi, Toi muon mua 1 ve khu hoi tu HN ve TPHCM trong dip tet nay. cho hoi gia ve la bao nhieu va co khuyen mai ko?.toi di ngay 18/01 va ve ngay 06 hoac 07/02. Xin hoi dai ly lam viec toi may gio?. dt:0918208490 chao than ai.
Yahoo! Photos Showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
Photo B
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:48:38PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > But if you read this bug (#307833), you'd see that the maintainer doesn't
> > consider it a bug, and has documented why in the README file.
> It is a bug as the package is not usable without curl or wget installed.
> Though, I give him
On 1/12/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Qui, 2006-01-12 às 18:08 -0200, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> > - Scott's url with patches isn't part of the "give something back"
> > approach that we want. We need to be well informed about patches, but
> > we don't know exactly how;
>
> Don't
Hi,
> > Another difference I noticed is that fl-cow takes a list of
> > directories to protect in FL_COW, and seems to copy files
> > unconditionally on 'open'.
> >
> > cowdancer caches a list of i-nodes so that it won't try to break
> > hardlinks more than once. (cow-shell does this much work).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: easychem
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Francois-Xavier Coudert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://easychem.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : Draw high-quality molecules and chemical 2D formula
Hi,
I've dug out some information from IRC logs:
saens was overloaded around 5 Jan 2006, with load average of 140 or
something, and eventually apache stopped. Since saens is one of
ftp.debian.org, it had a large impact, and packages.debian.org is
disabled temporarily as a workaround.
If anyone
Hi,
We've been recently talking about creating a group to maintain games in Debian
in a collaborative way. As a starting point, I've created a mailing list in
alioth for coordination, and also for create discussion threads about the main
problems related to game development and games packages in D
Thanks, I have already fixed my debian system - it was unconfigured
loopback network device problem. Adding auto lo to
/etc/network/interfaces helped. I am providing this information just for
somone who accidently hit this thread, searching solution for similiar
problem.
My object was not to solve
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 08:42 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > This is an update on using userland COW method with pbuilder.
> > >
> > > cowdancer is a tool that allows you to "cp -al" (hardlink) a tree, and
> > > break the hardlink when a write-open to a file is performed. The
> > > adve
Hi,
> > This is an update on using userland COW method with pbuilder.
> >
> > cowdancer is a tool that allows you to "cp -al" (hardlink) a tree, and
> > break the hardlink when a write-open to a file is performed. The
> > adventurous part of cowdancer COW implementation is that it's trying
> > to
Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 21:18 -0500, Joey Hess escreveu:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > I agree with "similar things being said" but i'm yet to hear about the
> > lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
> > don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:41:28PM +0100, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:25, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Jens Peter Secher [Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:50:26 +0100]:
> > > I need to test that a package can be built with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 on
> > > HPPA, Arm, or M68k. Is there a DD
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 07:27 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an update on using userland COW method with pbuilder.
>
> cowdancer is a tool that allows you to "cp -al" (hardlink) a tree, and
> break the hardlink when a write-open to a file is performed. The
> adventurous part of cowd
> What does aptitude give as the breakdown between unused packages being
> automatically removed, and packages being removed that you actually
> requested installed?
Well I did not install any packages through aptitude.
The numbers of packages below the lines
The following packages will be automa
Hi,
This is an update on using userland COW method with pbuilder.
cowdancer is a tool that allows you to "cp -al" (hardlink) a tree, and
break the hardlink when a write-open to a file is performed. The
adventurous part of cowdancer COW implementation is that it's trying
to do this from within use
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:26:50AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> /me...who expects tons of Ubuntu/Debian discussions at Solutions Linux
> in Paris (Jan 31-Feb 2) with both fellow French developers,
> users...and Ubuntu users as well. No chance that people from Canonical
> show up over there? I
* Joerg Platte wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. November 2005 17:48 schrieb Norbert Tretkowski:
> > I'll add initramfs-tools soon, the reason why there's only yaird
> > is that it's easier to backport than initramfs-tools.
>
> Great news :-) I'm using initramfs-tools for sid for some time now
> with some en
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that's current practice, but nobody is stopping anyone to give a
> little bit more care into QA packages...
The hardest problem, speaking as someone who wanted to do that and who
still wants to do that as soon as I can find time, is that m
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> that distinction isn't made clear: it's only if people think about it
> that they will realise that they are supposed to report debian-specific
> packaging bugs to the debian bugs database and package-specific bugs to
> whatever upstre
Em Qui, 2006-01-12 às 18:08 -0200, Gustavo Franco escreveu:
> - Scott's url with patches isn't part of the "give something back"
> approach that we want. We need to be well informed about patches, but
> we don't know exactly how;
Don't we?
Debian is Ubuntu's upstream, right?
When you modify some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Sempione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mpc123
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Fernando Vezzosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mpc123.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Command-line Mu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: mailtextbody
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Toastfreeware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/
* Licen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: fullquottel
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Author : Toastfreeware ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/
* Licens
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Moratti Claudio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: knmap
Version : 1.99-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/knmap
* License : GPL
Description : Kde interface
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:52:13PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 21:47]:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > However, on the other hand feel free to create a "common maintained
> > > packages team" that adopts such pac
* David Nusinow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 21:47]:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > However, on the other hand feel free to create a "common maintained
> > packages team" that adopts such packages :)
> Isn't that pretty much what the qa team does?
Not really.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:35:18PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> However, on the other hand feel free to create a "common maintained
> packages team" that adopts such packages :)
Isn't that pretty much what the qa team does?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:25, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jens Peter Secher [Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:50:26 +0100]:
> > I need to test that a package can be built with g++ >= 4:4.0.2-2 on
> > HPPA, Arm, or M68k. Is there a DD accessible machine that has a current
> > version of g++ installed?
>
>
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.01.12.2135 +0100]:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 19:36]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
> > >> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > * Christoph Berg
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 19:36]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
> >> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > * Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
> >> >> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Suffield wrote:
Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the
threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that,
I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packages
(I've tried two or three times to invent one).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joachim Breitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xara
* URL : http://www.xaraxtreme.org/
* License : to be released as GPL
Description : a vector drawing program
The makers of the long-around Windows XaraX vector drawing p
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Well it's nice in theory. The problem is that you have to set the
> threshold high enough to exempt glibc and dpkg, and when you do that,
> I have not yet found a metric that complains about any other packages
> (I've tried two or three times to invent one).
I think the pr
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +,
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
> Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
> serious enough to impact the packages' releaseworthyness. This is by
> definition. Even if there are many of those bugs, they
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:49:14AM -0600, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:34:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I cannot point you exactly why _this_ circular dependency is going to
> > > be a problem, no.
> > > However I can point you to bug #310490 which show a woody system th
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > Let's take this one apart and s
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>
> >While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
> >Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
> >serious enough to impact the pack
On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so
> > > much.
> >
> > I don't inte
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so
> > much.
>
> I don't intend to participate in this type of email argument with you; I've
>
Dear Mr(s),
I visited your site (debian.org) today, and I really like it. I am very
interested in exchanging links. I've gone ahead and posted a link to
your site, on this page:
www.budapestnetapartments.hu/travel-links/europe-finland-helsinki.htm
Your website details:
Url: debian.org
Descript
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > * Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
>> >> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > Really, how about just automatically[1] r
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:57:46PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
> > also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
> > debian, when it
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Frank Küster wrote:
>>>
Baishampayan Ghose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
>>>
>>>ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:23:31 +0100, "Thomas Viehmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, thanks for taking the initiative I think the matter is too
> important to be left alone just for avoiding to step on anyones toes.
>
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Random ideas for negative conseq
[note: sent to d-d only]
I demand that Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton may or may not have written...
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 02:04:45PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
>> * Matthew Garrett [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:50:56 +]:
[snip]
>>> It's the job of either the bug submitter or (more usually) the De
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:34:27PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I cannot point you exactly why _this_ circular dependency is going to
> > be a problem, no.
> > However I can point you to bug #310490 which show a woody system that
> > could not be upgraded to sarge without removing most of KDE.
>
>
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>>Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
>>also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
>>debian, when it suggests to use a broken tool while another
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:12:27PM +0400, Stepan Golosunov wrote:
> > Looking at them, I fail to see why debconf-i18n has to depend on
> > debconf.
>
> Because /usr/share/doc/debconf-i18n is a symlink?
perhaps the link should be the other way round. for example the most
common package split would
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:30:56AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 09 janvier 2006 à 22:15 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Here the lists of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by
> > > maintainers.
> >
> > > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 18:11]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
> >> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
> >> > without maintain
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
>> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
>> > without maintained rdepends from testing?
>>
>> Seconded.
>
> well, just make
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I see, i would like to see the utnubu patch list[0] integrated in PTS
> (scott's already is[1]), with that everyone subscribed to the package
The patch list from utnubu is the same than the one from Scott, so there's
no point to add a pointer to the utn
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The greatest strength of having Canonical on our side, from my POV, is that
> it's a company full of people like Daniel, who are fundamentally Debian
> people, and who are willing to work with you on this kind of personal
> level. I don't really buy in to
* Thomas Viehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 15:56]:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > I very much agree that we should strive to make packages as good as
> > possible, but if users depend on a package and there are no real
> > showstoppers in it, we might do our users a better service with shipping
>
On Thu, January 12, 2006 16:02, Frank Küster wrote:
> But if a rather new package in active development has many non-RC bugs,
> some of them crippling upstream features, and one of them "New version
> N.m.o available" (retitled three times meanwhile), then our users are
> probably better served by
* Christoph Berg [Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:05:52 +0100]:
> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
> > without maintained rdepends from testing?
> Seconded.
Me too.
(jftr, http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/06/msg00176
* Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-12 16:05]:
> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
> > without maintained rdepends from testing?
>
> Seconded.
I don't think it's such a great idea (at least not done by itsel
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:03:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Of course, this is trivial, but fixing this bug (251 days old) is
> also trivial. Then why complain ? I feel that it gives a bad image of
> debian, when it suggests to use a broken tool while another one is being
> repaired.
But if
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> I agree with "similar things being said" but i'm yet to hear about the
>> lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
>> don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
>> that anaconda "p
* Christoph Berg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060112 16:28]:
> Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
> > without maintained rdepends from testing?
>
> Seconded.
well, just make a list that I can just copy into my hint file.
Che
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:47:53AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 1/11/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course people can do this, but this is so very much not the point. The
> > point is that publishing source packages on a website that people have to
> > poll is not "givin
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:26:26AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 ? 01:49 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a ?crit :
> > > At the very least, I think they should be treated like pre-depends, with
> > > a request on this list being mandatory before adding a circular
> > > depe
On 1/12/06, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if you read my other mail, but I do find it hard to
> cooperate with Ubuntu for my own package, because each time it has
> been uploaded to Ubuntu it was done my a different person, so I don't
> know who I should be cooperating /wit
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:21:03PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote :
> > ...
> > If a maintainer would not manage to respond to an RC bug for three months
> > the package is obviousely not maintained and should be taken over by
> > somebody else, IMHO.
>
> I wish something like that applied to all
On 1/12/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Use of the ECW SDK with Unlimited Decompressing and Unlimited Compression
> > for
> > applications licensed under a GNU General Public style license ("GPL") is
> > governed by the "ECW SDK PUBLIC USE LICENSE AGREEMENT".
>
> Not su
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:36:06 +, Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole -
> thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded
> view.
> Basically - I dont think the brand should be put on ubuntu as a
> whole
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58, Frank Küster wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Baishampayan Ghose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
> >
> > ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans
Re: Thomas Viehmann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Really, how about just automatically[1] removing orphaned packages
> without maintained rdepends from testing?
Seconded.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Frank Küster wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>>>Baishampayan Ghose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
>>
>>ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
>
>
> That
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:17:55 -0200, Gustavo Franco
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I disagree with a pile of patches and as i said it would be better a
> revision control system and good log (and debian/changelog) entries.
How is a revision control system (BTW, all of my packages are
in a
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:22 -0200, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 16:48 +0100, martin f krafft escreveu:
>> > What would you like to see?
>>
>> I think submitting bugs and patches to the BTS would already b
"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, January 12, 2006 14:23, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>>> Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
>>> orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
>> Maybe this should not only be limited to packages with RC
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
While the package might not be of the quality we strive to achieve within
Debian; if a bug is not release critical we consider the bug not to be
serious enough to impact the packages' releaseworthyness. This is by
definition. Even if there are many of
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I very much agree that we should strive to make packages as good as
> possible, but if users depend on a package and there are no real
> showstoppers in it, we might do our users a better service with shipping
> than with not shipping the package.
No. Shipping unsupported p
The submitter of #344758 wrote:
> The script should create /var/run/dirmngr to allow users to map their
> /var/run to a temporary filesystem like tmpfs. Thanks.
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> What do you think about this request? It seems reasonable, but I think if
> this should be supported, there o
On Thu, January 12, 2006 14:23, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>> Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
>> orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
> Maybe this should not only be limited to packages with RC bugs... For a
> lot of packages with inactive maint
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Baishampayan Ghose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How did you manage to download the sources from there? I get:
>
> ftp://ftp%40aczoom%2Ecom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/itrans/53/itrans53.zip
That's exactly what I tried - it doesn't ma
On 1/12/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > I agree with "similar things being said" but i'm yet to hear about the
> > lack of collaboration and give Debian something back. For example: I
> > don't remember too much people caring about PGI (Progeny) and after
> > th
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's license (
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346 ) can be considered
> free enough to be in main:
FYI, the right place to ask this is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving it over there. Full-quoting because of this.
Summary: I don't believe this is
On 1/11/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:48:22PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On 1/11/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 16:48 +0100, martin f krafft escreveu:
> > > > What would you like to see?
>
> > > I think subm
On 1/11/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 19:54 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> > Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
> > > Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensu
On 1/11/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:25:01PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> (...)
> > Are you saying that they're spending more money with PR than really
> > contributing back ?
>
> I don't know about money, but I'm pretty sure their claims exceed
> th
Hi,
first of all, thanks for taking the initiative I think the matter is too
important to be left alone just for avoiding to step on anyones toes.
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
> orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal o
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
If RC bugs go unanswered for 3 months, I agree that something should be
done; I just don't think that saying someone else should take it over is
necessarily enough. I believe we need clearer methods for handling packages
in the case that *no one* is ha
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> This seems like a nice idea. File a whishlist bug against reportbug ;)
>
If you really want to do this, look at
/usr/share/doc/reportbug/README.developers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/12/06, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > [Florian Weimer]
> >> What about: stop threatening your fellow developers?
> >
> > Why is specifying the consequences of doing a bad job with maintaining
> > ones debian packages threatening
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
