On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:57:54AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 09:52]:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 04:34]:
> > > > I also think volatile is precisely the wrong place
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:28:19PM +0100, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> I'm trying to upload auctex 11.82-1 since a few days, but I keep getting
> the following answer from katie.
> The .changes file look fine to me, it is signed by my GnuPG key, as
> usual.
> Does anyone know why katie does not f
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the freetype package.
Due to a new job I haven't had any time to work on FreeType in the last
few months. As such I would like someone to adopt it. A team would
probably be best, there's lots of difficult issues with this package
and it requ
Hi Daniel,
On Monday, 06 Feb 2006, you wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:30:01PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > But that doesn't mean that we can issue an update to a stable package.
> >
> > Currently they are mainly done for security purposes -- but stable updates
> > should not be confined t
Scripsit Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ian: I add my voice to what you already perceive: these tests would be
> welcome, and I'd probably accept them to my few packages. A very short
> (one screenfull or so) HOWTO/README about how the whole system works linked
> from the bug would be
Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously any patch that is automatically generated in this way is a
> work based on A. The license of A permits to use "patch files" for
> the purpose of modifying the sources of A at build time. However the
> license of A doesn't explicitly permit us
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are willing to help, you can find all needed files on
> people:~salve/pub/apt/.
s/pub/public_html/
I didn't find the culprit, unfortunately.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Bioch
Hello there,
I noticed that your site points to an executive career site.
You can generate an additional stream of income for you just by linking
to another executive career site.
ExecutiveTrumpet is a resume distribution service exclusively for
($75k+) executives and it provides around $37.
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload auctex 11.82-1 since a few days, but I keep getting
the following answer from katie.
The .changes file look fine to me, it is signed by my GnuPG key, as
usual.
Does anyone know why katie does not find the signature? Am I doing
something stupid?
If you are willing t
* Ian Jackson wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout writes:
> > The requirements for getting into a stable release update are not
> > black magic, they're quite well known:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.1r1/
>
> 2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data loss,
> data corrup
Martijn van Oosterhout writes ("Re: timezone data packaged separately and in
volatile?"):
> The requirements for getting into a stable release update are not
> black magic, they're quite well known:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.1r1/
2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead int
Hi,
I'm no longer using python-xml[1] for my daily development, and as a
consequence, I feel I'm not doing as good a job as I should on the
python-xml package. I'm therefore considering passing maintenance to
someone else, or co-maintaining the package.
The packaging itself is pretty straightfor
* Martijn van Oosterhout ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 14:09]:
> ISTM the d-volatile is the right place for this. However, in the mean
> time I think someone should send a message to debian-announce that
> anyone running a debian machine with an Australian (or other affected)
> timezone needs to get
2006/2/7, Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It's not us, but the stable maintainer, that you'd have to talk to;
> > he has traditionally not been interested in these sorts of updates to
> > stable as far as I know.
>
> Well, perhaps a first start is creating the package for stable-updates;
> wo
Adrian von Bidder writes ("Re: Automatic testing of .deb's"):
> On Monday 06 February 2006 19:53, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > On 2/6/06, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ filing automatic package tests to the Debian bts ]
>
> > The Ubuntu maintainer should always open bugs with the test rel
David N. Welton writes ("Tcl in Debian - volunteers needed"):
> Apparently some of the packages I maintain were removed from Debian's
> testing distribution this evening: rivet, tcldom, tclxml and tclsoap,
> because of open bugs against them that I haven't found the time to
> close. "My bad", as t
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:51:29AM +0100, Philipp Meier wrote:
> Could any of the admins please have a look on this or point my to the
> right address?
Why do you think alioth admins read this list, or that your question had
anything to do with Debian development?
The frontpage at http://alioth.d
Hi all,
the debian java maintainers migrated their CVS repository on alioth to a
SVN repository. I used to have access to CVS for my account
"llucifer-guest" with ssh and public key auth on alioth. Since the SVN
migration I did not manage to get access to the SVN repository. SVN
itself works out f
Hi Neil!
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006, Neil Roeth wrote:
> This web page: http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ has a link to the
> "Latest XML Policy Draft" which has info on where files should go. Have you
> seen that?
No, thanks for the link.
I have still a question concerning the placement in s
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:52:15PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 04:34]:
> > > I also think volatile is precisely the wrong place to put this kind of
> > > data -- it isn't part of the defa
* Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 09:52]:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 04:34]:
> > > I also think volatile is precisely the wrong place to put this kind of
> > > data -- it isn't part of the default apt.sou
[ debian-volatile dropped ]
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:41:26PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:30:01PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> > But that doesn't mean that we can issue an update to a stable package.
> >
> > Currently they are mainly done for security
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:13:07AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 04:34]:
> > I also think volatile is precisely the wrong place to put this kind of
> > data -- it isn't part of the default apt.sources for one thing; and it
> > places an extra burden on t
* Anand Kumria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060207 04:34]:
> I also think volatile is precisely the wrong place to put this kind of
> data -- it isn't part of the default apt.sources for one thing; and it
> places an extra burden on the maintainer(s) (who know have to track
> three different upgrade path
24 matches
Mail list logo
