On Saturday 11 March 2006 03:27, Kevin Mark wrote:
[DPL as mediator]
The DPL already could do that. The DPL probably in the past *did* step in
in some cases behind the scenese. There's no reason for the technical
overhead of a mediator@ email alias - there's leader, and people who trust
the D
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:14:01AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:47:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Could these mails be required to have a valid GPG signature (either
> > for a key in a public keyserver or a DD key)? This would eliminate the
> > spam problem (almost
Hi,
David Mosberger-Tang, le Fri 10 Mar 2006 19:47:10 -0700, a écrit :
> Its purposes is not to "grep for warnings" but instead to
> look for pairs of warnings that are *guaranteed* to cause crashes on
> 64-bit machines.
I did understand that. And my abs() example shows that gcc-4.0 doesn't
comp
Samuel,
You're missing the point of the check-implicit-pointer-functions
script. Its purposes is not to "grep for warnings" but instead to
look for pairs of warnings that are *guaranteed* to cause crashes on
64-bit machines. gcc -Wall normally spits out tons of spurious
warnings for 64-bit dirty
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:43:22PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> It's sad, yes, but I think it's just the way people work. Debian is a city
> now, not a village anymore - lots of people know lots of other people not
> very well or not at all. This probably includes people in important
> fu
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 11 Mar 2006 01:43:34 +0100, a écrit :
> > $ gcc-3.3 -c -g -O -Wall t.c
> > t.c: In function `foo':
> > t.c:4: warning: implicit declaration of function `strdup'
> > t.c:4: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
>
> Because strdup() here gets an implicit
>
David Mosberger-Tang, le Fri 10 Mar 2006 17:06:22 -0700, a écrit :
> I'm inclined to treat this as a gcc-4 bug.
It is not.
> $ cat t.c
> char *
> foo (char *str)
> {
> return strdup(str);
> }
> $ gcc-3.3 -c -g -O -Wall t.c
> t.c: In function `foo':
> t.c:4: warning: implicit declaration of func
I'm inclined to treat this as a gcc-4 bug. To witness:
$ cat t.c
char *
foo (char *str)
{
return strdup(str);
}
$ gcc-3.3 -c -g -O -Wall t.c
t.c: In function `foo':
t.c:4: warning: implicit declaration of function `strdup'
t.c:4: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast
gcc-4.0
pe, 2006-03-10 kello 20:31 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > pe, 2006-03-10 kello 21:49 +0100, Adrian von Bidder kirjoitti:
> > > /me is trying to imagine the Debian project's members trying to agree on
> > > an
> > > enemy...
> >
> >
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> pe, 2006-03-10 kello 21:49 +0100, Adrian von Bidder kirjoitti:
> > /me is trying to imagine the Debian project's members trying to agree on an
> > enemy...
>
> Open RC bugs. Go to http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php, pick one,
> hate it to death. Sle
dann frazier, le Fri 10 Mar 2006 15:46:58 -0700, a écrit :
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ah, good. But your script misses some warnings:
> >
> > oss.c:83: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
> > 'strdu
> >
> > because o
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Are there any more hints what might stop the computer from doing
> cleeen halt / reboot than apm/acpi or sysvinit. I just tried
Yes, check for changes in /sbin/halt.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, Peter Kourzanov wrote:
> For most of the packages, what is so different in cross-compilation in
> comparison to native?
On my limited cross-compiling knowledge (and nearly zero experience), you
have three classes of packages:
1. Those that just compile, link and ship -- thes
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ah, good. But your script misses some warnings:
>
> oss.c:83: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
> 'strdu
>
> because of "incompatible" and "built-in". Please fix ;)
Thanks Samuel,
Can you poin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: listen
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Mehdi Abaakouk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://listengnome.free.fr/
* License : GPL
Description : a music management and
pe, 2006-03-10 kello 21:49 +0100, Adrian von Bidder kirjoitti:
> /me is trying to imagine the Debian project's members trying to agree on an
> enemy...
Open RC bugs. Go to http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php, pick one,
hate it to death. Sleep well.
--
C is the *wrong* language for your applic
On Thursday 09 March 2006 18:41, Amaya wrote:
> ... focus on attacking Ubuntu
Ah, yes, we need an enemy so we can unite against it. Old-fashioned
tactics, proved to work.
-- vbi
/me is trying to imagine the Debian project's members trying to agree on an
enemy...
--
One picture is worth 128K
ObIntro: I add my thanks to all the others'
On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:38, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a "no Martin,
> can we revert it?", it seems that the default reply is "ok Martin, see
> you, thanks.".
>
> It's volunteer work, he's free to d
On 3/10/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:38:51AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > What's wrong with us ? I just read some messages with a "no Martin,
> > can we revert it?", it seems that the default reply is "ok Martin, see
> > you, thanks.".
>
> > It's vo
On Thursday 02 March 2006 04:46, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Package: libacme-brainfck-perl
> Provides: libacme-brainfuck-perl
Ah, and back to the time when some words where magic and caused burn marks
on the paper around the ink.
I never have and probably never will see why some people find 'f*ck'
If you don't want to read the rant, skip to the bottom where I volunteer
to help
Anthony Towns wrote:
>In the mail to the DPL I mentioned above, James outlined three fairly
>significant technical changes that could be implemented to make the
>job easier, and could be done by anyone, without r
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Until last month, dpkg "forgot" about conffiles which were removed or
>> moved on package upgrade. As a consequence, maintainers had to
>> remember to purge these conffiles "by hand" in the package postrm
>> script.
>
> I just want t
Roger Leigh wrote:
> Until last month, dpkg "forgot" about conffiles which were removed or
> moved on package upgrade. As a consequence, maintainers had to
> remember to purge these conffiles "by hand" in the package postrm
> script.
I just want to highlight the word "these" above in order to re
On Friday, 10 March 2006 15:41, Lars Roland wrote:
> You could subscribe to debian-mentors and start crafting a package.
> Even though Debian has a impressiv amount of packages there are still
> some major ones left (mpich2, pvfs2, trac...).
trac is in
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://
Hi,
> Jump in and start doing something for Debian. Whether that is finding
> fixes for open bugs in our BTS that do not have patches yet, writing
> documentation, translating stuff that needs to be translated, or
> packaging software that needs to be packaged (or help package software
> where the
Hi, Mark...
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:27, Mark Walter wrote:
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
Great to hear that.
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
>
> Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer
> :-
Until last month, dpkg "forgot" about conffiles which were removed or
moved on package upgrade. As a consequence, maintainers had to
remember to purge these conffiles "by hand" in the package postrm
script.
1) sarge -> etch upgrades
-
In order to handle upgrades from sarg
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote:
> Hi all,
Hello.
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
That's rather question for debian-mentors mailing list.
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
>
> Two of them are not
On 3/10/06, Mark Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my question:
>
> Can anybody help to me to satisfy the demand for the two point's as I'am
> interested to be a debian developer ?
Ahh the the cool factor of having a Debian email address (not that i have one).
>
> What can I do to arriv
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to step in to be a debian developer.
>
> While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
> boxes to apply.
>
> Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-(
>
> H
Hi all,
I want to step in to be a debian developer.
While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked
boxes to apply.
Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-(
Here are the two point's:
***
If you intend to package software, do you have a De
Hello list,
Any of you know about the sitebar package? The upstream version has evolved and
the
debian package seems to be stalled since a year ago. I tried contacting the
maintainer. Does anybody know him?
Thanks,
Josep SERRANO.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
[Ways to improve keyring maintenance]
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 23:25 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The second was to get rt setup to, uh, track requests -- it's waiting
> on the first thing (since rt sends auto-replies, and auto-replies to
> spam is bad, mmmkay), and possibly also lacks a debian.org
Let's move this to elsewhere than -vote for technical discussion, d-ppc and
d-ppc64 are good places for this.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:21:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:03:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Are bruckner and voltaire overloaded or do they lack se
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Andreas Tille wrote:
Thanks fo the foreward but I'm afraid we might be on the
wrong track. I downgraded sysvinit on one of the machines
(by chance the apm based) to
apt-cache policy sysvinit
sysvinit:
Installed: 2.86.ds1-4
Candidate: 2.86.ds1-12
Version table:
2.86
sarge's default kernel can't use my SB16!
I have used my SB16 ever since kernel 2.0, 2.2, and
2.4 in woody. They all work. But with sarge's kernel
2.4, it can't work. When I modprobe sb, it complains
no such device.
Does sarge's kernel 2.4 support non-PNP ISA card?
Why does sarge always try to u
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 23:51 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> Yeah yeah, the project sucks. Whatever. Say, Josselin, why aren't you a
> DPL candidate?
Given the list of known candidates, I considered being a candidate
myself, just like Bill, but I don't have the time to assume such a
position.
37 matches
Mail list logo
