The wiki page of D-I team meetings
(http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings) now links the full
log of the April 2006 meeting that took place yesterday from 16:00UTC
to 17:30 UTC.
http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/irc-meeting-20060429/log
The meeting minutes will be published as soon
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Apr 2006, Marc Haber stated:
>> Agreed. An accepted way to do this is to ship a shell script with the
>> Debian source package which operates on an pristine upstream tarball
>> obtained from upstream and delivers the Debian .orig.tar.gz for
>> c
On 29 Apr 2006, Marc Haber stated:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:20:32 +0200, "Bernhard R. Link"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For me a changed .orig.tar.gz means I no longer can easily verify
>> what exactly is changed. So I have to not only to download the
>> original upstream version and unpack it
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> I'm surprised that there would be a need for a lintian check for it, but
> I guess it's better than letting such bugs go unnoticed.
I can add one; it's not a lot of overhead given t
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:16:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
> >> As a result, I must now have two versions of pyth
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
>> The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
>
>> As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
>> a bug.
>
>> alsa-utils should depend on "python |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
> As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
> a bug.
> alsa-utils should depend on "python | python-minimal", or perhaps the
> python packages sho
The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
a bug.
alsa-utils should depend on "python | python-minimal", or perhaps the
python packages should Provide python-minimal.
Does this seem right?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 12:13:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Sa den 29. Apr 2006 um 12:08 schrieb Andrew Donnellan:
> > >That whould be a catastrope. As 2.6 is miles from stable a 2.6 kernel is
> > >no kernel for stable servers. (Well, my s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haxe
Version : 0.b5
Upstream Author : Nicolas Cannasse
* URL or Web page : http://haxe.org
* License : GPL
Description : Web programming languge generating Flash SWF
haXe is a programming language similar to JavaScript
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
apt-build really lacks of support right now.
It works pretty well, but currently it is not capable to deal with
every particular case that it might encounter.
Many improvements could be done, mainly by using libapt-pkg-perl and
enhancing it (like adding new bind
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:54:47PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: libkwiki-plugins-perl
> Version : 0.01
> Upstream Author : Various. Compiled by Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> This morning I reported two bugs (using reportbug), which have not been
> acknowledged by BTS. Now I've just received an update on a bug which was
> CC:'ed to my personal email. I've answered, but http//bugs.debian.org
> has not been updated and the u
On 4/29/06, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sa den 29. Apr 2006 um 12:08 schrieb Andrew Donnellan:
> >That whould be a catastrope. As 2.6 is miles from stable a 2.6 kernel is
> >no kernel for stable servers. (Well, my system with sid is no
gustavo halperin wrote:
> Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
>>gustavo halperin dijo [Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0300]:
>>
>>
>I think that we have a problem when the common library between XFree and
>/usr/lib are update in /usr/lib.
>I currently have XFree 4.5, when the library libfontcon
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
gustavo halperin dijo [Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0300]:
I think that we have a problem when the common library between XFree and
/usr/lib are update in /usr/lib.
I currently have XFree 4.5, when the library libfontconfig1 was update
to v
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:56:06AM -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:43:47AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > That's because sometimes it takes that long to find out whether the
> > failure is really the maintainer's problem rather than the buildd
> > admin's.
>
> Ok,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 05:26:38PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, with all that said, do you still believe it is normal that a perfectly
> > running daily build was rejected in maybe a few minutes/hours after i sent
> > that email,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> So, with all that said, do you still believe it is normal that a perfectly
> running daily build was rejected in maybe a few minutes/hours after i sent
> that email, while i had offered to continue running it until a proper
> replacemen
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:58:17AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:28:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Notice also that both you and Colin Watson, where donated pegasos machines,
> > (and guess who arranged that), so the unavailability of a decent build
> > machine
> > is
This morning I reported two bugs (using reportbug), which have not been
acknowledged by BTS. Now I've just received an update on a bug which was
CC:'ed to my personal email. I've answered, but http//bugs.debian.org
has not been updated and the update wasn't ack'ed either.
Is there a maintenance ru
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:22:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> I use sid and Gnome ; I upgraded my box (after 3 weeks in which I did
> not have time to) ; now I have serious problems with fonts.
>
> Symptoms: some programs fail to find and use the fonts ,and are then
> almost unusable ; including '
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:51:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >- So the answer is right, why would you want to use XFree now?
> I guess, he has unsupported hardware, ugly proprietary drivers, etc.
I don't know of any hardware supported by XFree86 4.5 th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: kalign
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Timo Lassmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://msa.cgb.ki.se/downloads/kalign-1.04.tgz
License : GPL
Description : Globa
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:28:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Notice also that both you and Colin Watson, where donated pegasos machines,
> (and guess who arranged that), so the unavailability of a decent build machine
> is no excuse.
I can't speak for the other guys, but I have a Pegasos machine
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
> > Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
> >
> > Examples are:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sa den 29. Apr 2006 um 12:08 schrieb Andrew Donnellan:
> >That whould be a catastrope. As 2.6 is miles from stable a 2.6 kernel is
> >no kernel for stable servers. (Well, my system with sid is not in this
>
> Not stable?!?! It's been around for sev
On 4/29/06, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
Am Fr den 28. Apr 2006 um 23:28 schrieb Brian M. Carlson:
> Don't ask here. Ask on debian-user (or debian-user-german, if it
> exists), as this is where the question belongs. The people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
Am Fr den 28. Apr 2006 um 23:28 schrieb Brian M. Carlson:
> Don't ask here. Ask on debian-user (or debian-user-german, if it
> exists), as this is where the question belongs. The people there can
> help you with some tricks to determine wh
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:20:32 +0200, "Bernhard R. Link"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For me a changed .orig.tar.gz means I no longer can easily verify what
>exactly is changed. So I have to not only to download the original
>upstream version and unpack it and make sure the files do not differ,
>I hav
There is a very long-standing wishlist bug against lintian (#47776) asking
that lintian check to be sure shared libraries are built with
-D_REENTRANT. Policy 10.2 indeed says:
You must specify the gcc option -D_REENTRANT when building a library
(either static or shared) to make the librar
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:14:12AM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
>So I would be more curious what could be the standard way to resolve
>this issue asap.
Please read http://keyring.debian.org/replacing_keys.html
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
all replies tries to tell me that I'm intend to crack the GPG. Believe
me, If I could do it, I would not use it anymore since it's not safe
enough.
Anyway, at least, I resolved the upgrade from 1024 to more bits, but I
loose my signatures unfortunately. :(
So I would be more curious what could b
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:21:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > The maintainer is held respon
34 matches
Mail list logo
